Abstract
We examined the ability of yellow poplar ( Liriodendron tulipifera ) tissue cultures and plantlets to express modified mercuric reductase ( merA ) gene constructs. Mercury-resistant bacteria express merA to convert highly toxic, ionic mercury, Hg(ll), to much less toxic, elemental mercury, Hg(O). Expression of merA in transgenic plants might provide an ecologically compatible approach for the remediation of mercury pollution. Because the alteration of the bacterial merA gene sequence is necessary for high-level expression in Arabidopsis thaliana , yellow poplar proembryogenic masses (PEMs) were transformed with three modified merA constructs via microprojectile bombardment. Each construct was synthesized to have altered flanking regions with increasing amounts of modified coding sequence. All merA constructs conferred resistance to toxic, ionic mercury in independently transformed PEM colonies. Stability of merA transgene expression increased in parallel with the extent of gene coding sequence modification. Regenerated plantlets containing the most modified merA gene ( merA18 ) germinated and grew vigorously in media containing normally toxic levels of ionic mercury. The merA18 plantlets released elemental mercury at approximately 10 times the rate of untransformed plantlets. These results indicate that plants expressing modified merA constructs may provide a means for the phytoremediation of mercury pollution.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schnoor, J., Light, L.A., McCuteheon, S.C., Wolfe, N.L., and Carreira, L.H. 1995. Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environmental Science and Technology 7: 318–323.
Baker, A.J.M. and Brooks, R.R. 1989. Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccu-mulate metallic elements-a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochem-istry. Biorecovery 1: 81–126.
Baker, A.J.M., McGrath, S.P., Sidoli, C.M.D., and Reeves, R.D. 1994. The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 11: 41–49.
Salt, D.E., Prince, R.C., Pickering, I.J., and Raskin, I. 1995. Mechanisms of cadmium mobility and accumulation in indian mustard. Plant Physiol. 109: 1427–1433.
Dittmer, H.J. 1937. A quantitative study of the roots and root hairs of a winter rye plant (Secale cereale). American Journal of Botany 24: 417–420.
Gray, D.H. and Sotir, R.B. 1996. Biotechnical and soil bioengineering stabilization. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Allard, B. and Arsenie, I. 1991. Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances in aquatic systems: an important process for the mercury cycle. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 56: 457–464.
Nriagu, J.O. 1979. Production and uses of mercury, pp. 23–41, in: The biogeo-chemistry of mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O. (ed). Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York.
Jernelov, A. and Lann, H. 1971. Mercury accumulation in food chains. Oikos 22: 403–406.
Windom, H.L. and Kendall, D.R. 1979. Accumulation and biotransformation of mercury, pp. 303–323, in: The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment. Nriagu, J.O. (ed). Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York.
Mason, R.P., Reinfelder, J.R. and Morel, F.M.M. 1996. Uptake, toxicity, and trophic transfer of mercury in a coastal diatom. Environmental Science and Technology 30: 1835–1845.
Hudson, R.J.M., Gherini, S.A., Fitsgerald, W.F. and Portella, D.B. 1995 Anthropogenic influences on the global mercury cycle: a model-based analysis. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80: 265–272.
Suzuki, T., Furukawa, K. and Tonomura, K. 1968. Studies on the removal of inorganic mercurial compounds in waste by the cell-reused method of mercury-resistant bacterium. Journal of Fermentation Technology 12: 1048–1055.
Hansen, C.L., Zwolinski, G., Martin, D. and Williams, J.W. 1984. Bacterial removal of mercury from sewage sludge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 26: 1330–1333.
Summers, A.0. 1986. Organization, expression, and evolution of genes for mercury resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 40: 607–634.
Fox, B. and Walsh, C.T. 1982. Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 2498–2503.
Summers, A.O. and Lewis, E. 1973. Volatilization of mercuric chloride by mercury-resistant plasmid-bearing strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureas, and Psuedomonas aeroginosa. J. Bacteriol. 113: 1070–1072.
Hanson, P.J., Lindberg, S.E., Tabberer, T.A., Owens, J.G. and Kim, K.-H. 1995. Foliar exchange of mercury vapor: evidence for compensation point. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80: 373–382.
Rugh, C.L., Wilde, H.D., Stack, N.M., Thompson, D.M., Summers, A.O. and Meagher, R.B. 1996. Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in trangenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified merA gene. Proc. Nat Acad. Scl. USA 93: 3182–3187.
Barrineau, P., Gilbert, P., Jackson, W.J., Jones, C.S., Summers, A.O. and Wisdom, S. 1984. The DNA sequence of the mercury resistance operon of the IncFII plasmid NR1. Journal of Molecular and Applied Genetics 2: 601–619.
Murray, E.E., Lotzer, J. and Eberle, M. 1989. Codon usage in plant genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 477–498.
Matzke, M.A. and Matzke, A.J.M. 1995. How and why do plants inactivate homologous (trans)genes. Plant Physiol. 107: 679–685.
Ingelbrecht, I., Van Houdt, H., Van Montagu, M. and Depicker, A. 1995. Posttranslational silencing of reporter transgenes in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 10502–10506.
Wilde, H.D., Meagher, R.B. and Merkle, S.A. 1992. Expression of foreign genes in transgenic yellow-poplar plants. Plant Physiol. 98: 114–120.
Kornfeld, R. and Kornfeld, S. 1885. Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccha-rides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54: 631–664.
Suszcynsky, E.M. and Shann, J.R. 1995. Phytotoxicity and accumulation of mercury subjected to different exposure routes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14: 61–67.
Du, S.-H. and Feng, S.C. 1983. Catalase activity of C3 and C4 species and its relationship to mercury vapor uptake. Environmental and Experimental Botany 23: 347–353.
Ogata, M. and Aikoh, H. 1984. Mechanism of metallic mercury oxidation in vitro by catalase and peroxidase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 33: 490–493.
Pawlowski, W.P. and Somers, D.A. 1996. Transgene inheritance in plants genetically engineered by microprojectile bombardment. Mol. Biotechnol. 6: 17–30.
Malik, V.S. and Wahab, S.Z. 1993. Versatile vectors for expressing genes in plants. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2: 60–70.
Sotak, R.J., Sommer, H.E. and Merkle, S.A. 1991. Relation of the developmental stage of zygotic embryos of yellow-poplar to their somatic embryogenic potential. Plant Cell Reports 10: 175–178.
Klein, T.M., Kornstein, L., Sanford, J.C., and Fromm, M.E. 1989. Genetic transformation of maize cells by particle bombardment. Plant Physiol. 91: 440–444.
Klimyuk, F, Oakeley, E.J., and Jost, J.P 1997. Antibiotics induce genome-wide hypermethylation in cultured Nicotians tabacum plants. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 1534–1540.
Klimyuk, V.I., Carroll, B.J., Thomas, C.M., and Jones, J.D.G. 1993. Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant J 3: 493–494.
McLean, B.G., Huang, S., McKinney, E.C. and Meagher, R.B. 1990. Plants contain highly divergent actin isovariants. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 17: 276–290.
Merkle, S.A., Wiecko AT., Sotak, R.J., and Sommer,H.E. 1990. Maturation and conversion of Liriodendron tulipifera somatic embryos. In Vitro Developmental and Cellular Biology 26: 1086–1093.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rugh, C., Senecoff, J., Meagher, R. et al. Development of transgenic yellow poplar for mercury phytoremediation. Nat Biotechnol 16, 925–928 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1098-925
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1098-925
This article is cited by
-
Genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation: advances and challenges
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Behavior, risk, and bioremediation potential of heavy metals/metalloids in the soil system
Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali (2023)
-
Phytoremediation and sequestration of soil metals using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology to modify plants: a review
Environmental Chemistry Letters (2023)