Research paperSpatial configuration of anthropogenic land cover impacts on urban warming
Introduction
Urbanization is a process of altering natural surface materials with manmade features. The anthropogenic alterations of natural surfaces significantly change the energy balance in cities and affect the urban thermal environment (Hart & Sailor, 2009). As a result, urbanization leads to urban heat island effect (UHI)—a phenomenon of higher temperatures in urban areas relative to surrounding rural areas. The UHI impacts human comfort and health, energy consumption, and water use (Brazel et al., 2007). Several studies reported that heat-related deaths were projected to increase due to a warming climate, population growth, and aging (Hajat et al., 2014, Li et al., 2013, Sheridan et al., 2012). As The United Nations (2013) reported, an additional two billion population will reside in urban areas by 2050, so building sustainable cities plays an important role in achieving global sustainability targets. Thus, UHI mitigation strategies should be incorporated into future city design and planning to minimize negative effects caused by the UHI.
A significant number of studies have investigated relationships between land surface temperature (LST) and the proportion of land cover features (Li et al., 2011, Liu and Weng, 2008, Myint et al., 2013, Weng et al., 2004, Yuan and Bauer, 2007). It is well understood that green vegetation provides cooling effects in cities (Weng et al., 2004, Yuan and Bauer, 2007), and that impervious surface area (ISA) increases surface temperatures (Essa et al., 2013, Mallick et al., 2013, Yuan and Bauer, 2007). The urban ISA is any nonporous land cover that prevents water from infiltrating into sub-surface layers, including buildings, roads, parking lots, sidewalks, driveways, and other built surfaces (Yang, Huang, Homer, Wylie, & Coan, 2003). Although early studies reported that percent distribution of ISA has a strong positive relationship with LST, individual effects of buildings and paved surfaces on LST was not well-investigated because these studies rely on medium spatial resolution images, such as Landsat and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Chen et al., 2006, Lazzarini et al., 2013, Yuan and Bauer, 2007), which do not have the capability to capture detailed land cover features (e.g., trees, individual buildings) in highly heterogeneous city environments. In contrast, the availability of very high resolution images, such as Quickbird and IKONOS, permits identification of more detailed land cover classes (e.g., trees, grass, buildings, and paved surfaces), and examination of their individual effects upon LST at finer spatial scales. For example, Myint et al. (2013) used a Quickbird image to discriminate detailed urban land use classes, and discovered that buildings do not contribute to the UHI effect in Phoenix — a desert city, but paved surfaces increase both daytime and nighttime LST. The study by Myint et al. (2013) demonstrated the potential of using very high spatial resolution imagery to reveal relationships between specific types of land cover and LST.
Very high resolution imagery also opens the possibility to investigate impacts of landscape configuration/structure upon the UHI (Cao et al., 2010, Connors et al., 2013Li et al., 2011, Liu and Weng, 2008Maimaitiyiming et al., 2014, Zhou et al., 2011). Landscape configuration/structure measures the spatial characteristics or arrangement of land cover parcels. These studies found that sizes, shapes, and segmentation of land cover parcels have influences on LST using landscape metrics derived from the FRAGSTATS software (Connors et al., 2013, Hart and Sailor, 2009Li et al., 2011, Liu and Weng, 2008). However, these landscape metrics cannot fully represent the clustered and dispersed patterns of each land cover category, because they are calculated based upon discrete land cover parcels and ignore all other variation (Fan and Myint, 2014, McGarigal and Cushman, 2005). For example, patch density, one of the most popular FRAGSTATS metrics, is widely used to represent a number of patches per unit area. However, it cannot provide any information about the sizes and spatial distribution of patches. Thus, alternative methodologies that have the ability to depict and analyze both locational and attribute information of land cover features are required to effectively measure landscape configuration. Spatial autocorrelation indices, e.g., local Moran's I and Getis-Ord Gi, can simultaneously deal with differences in location and attribute values (Goodchild, 1986). The Getis-Ord Gi has been recently utilized to examine the role of spatial patterns of green vegetation on air temperature (Myint, 2012). Zhou et al. (2011) highlighted the importance of controlling for effects of land cover composition when evaluating effects of configuration of land cover features on LST. Although Zhou et al. (2011) adjusted the effects of land cover composition on LST using multiple linear regressions when they examined the relationships between configuration variables and LST, the quantitative relationships between configuration variables and LST under controlled environments with similar compositions of land cover types has not yet been studied.
Given the above background, this study aims to: examine effects of composition and spatial pattern (cluster or disperse) of anthropogenic land cover features (i.e., buildings and paved surfaces) on LST, and quantify effects of spatial pattern of anthropogenic land cover features on LST by minimizing effects of land cover composition on LST. Anthropogenic land cover is any land cover that is caused by human land use. In this context, anthropogenic land cover features are those typically referred to as buildings and paved surfaces. Results of this study will provide better understanding of the impacts of spatial patterns of anthropogenic land cover types on LST and provide insights for UHI mitigation.
Section snippets
Study area
The city of Phoenix is the capital of the state of Arizona with an estimated population of approximately 1.5 million (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012), ranking as the sixth most populous city in the United States. Our study area is located in central Phoenix, encompassing 178 km2 areas (Fig. 1). The city has a subtropical desert climate with extremely hot summers and mild winters. Mean high temperature exceeds 38 °C throughout summer, making Phoenix the hottest city in the United States. The city has an
Land cover and land surface temperature data
Urban land cover classes were derived from a Quickbird image acquired on May 24, 2007 using an object-oriented classification approach (Myint, Gober, Brazel, Grossman-Clarke, & Weng, 2011). The Quickbird image has a spatial resolution of 2.4 m. Land cover categories include trees, grass, buildings, unmanaged soil, swimming pools, lakes and ponds, and paved surfaces (i.e., roads, parking lots, and sidewalks) (Fig. 1). The Quickbird image was first segmented into objects using Definients Developer
Effects of the composition of anthropogenic land cover features on LST
Relationships between LST and the compositions of the building or paved surface were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). However, building fraction has a very weak influence on both daytime (r2 = 0.03) and nighttime LST (r2 = 0.003) (Fig. 3). Paved surface fraction has much stronger relationships with LST compared to the building fraction (r2 = 0.15 for daytime and r2 = 0.32 for nighttime) (Fig. 3). A higher percent cover of paved surface leads to higher LST, and its positive effects on LST
Conclusions
This study investigated the impacts of the composition and spatial pattern of anthropogenic land cover features (i.e., building and paved surface) upon LST. We used a spatial autocorrelation index – local Moran's I – to quantify dispersed or clustered patterns of buildings and paved surfaces. The percent and spatial patterns of building have weak relationships with both daytime and nighttime LST, suggesting that buildings have minimal influences on the UHI effects in our study area. The percent
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number BCS-1026865, Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER), and under and by NSF under award numbers SES-0951366 and SES-0345945, Decision Center for a Desert City (DCDC).
References (33)
- et al.
Quantifying the cool island intensity of urban parks using ASTER and IKONOS data
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2010) - et al.
Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2006) - et al.
Downscaling of thermal images over urban areas using the land surface temperature-impervious percentage relationship
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
(2013) - et al.
A comparison of spatial autocorrelation indices and landscape metrics in measuring urban landscape fragmentation
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2014) - et al.
Temperature–land cover interactions: The inversion of urban heat island phenomenon in desert city areas
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2013) - et al.
Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2011) - et al.
Effects of green space spatial pattern on land surface temperature: Implications for sustainable urban planning and climate change adaptation
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
(2014) - et al.
Modeling urban heat islands in heterogeneous land surface and its correlation with impervious surface area by using night-time ASTER satellite data in highly urbanizing city, Delhi—India
Advances in Space Research
(2013) - et al.
Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2011) - et al.
Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2004)
Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery
Remote Sensing of Environment
Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes
Landscape and Urban Planning
Cash for grass—A cost effective method to conserve landscape water?
Active management area climate
Local indicators of spatial association—LISA
Geographical Analysis
Determinants of changes in the regional urban heat island in metropolitan Phoenix (Arizona, USA) between 1990 and 2004
Climate Research
Cited by (131)
Contributions to a global understanding of socioenvironmental justice related to urban forest: Trends from Brazilian cities in the southeastern Paraná State
2024, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningThe effects of 2-D and 3-D urban landscape metrics on mean radiant temperature in hot-arid Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona, USA
2024, Sustainable Cities and SocietyModeling the impact of urban land cover features and changes on the land surface temperature (LST): The case of Jordan
2024, Ain Shams Engineering JournalConfiguration characteristics of green-blue spaces for efficient cooling in urban environments
2024, Sustainable Cities and SocietySoil texture mediates the surface cooling effect of urban and peri-urban green spaces during a drought period in the city area of Hamburg (Germany)
2023, Science of the Total Environment