Elsevier

Geoderma

Volume 130, Issues 3–4, February 2006, Pages 272-283
Geoderma

A new approach to calculate the particle density of soils considering properties of the soil organic matter and the mineral matrix

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.024Get rights and content

Abstract

The particle density of soil (ρS) represents one of the soil's basic physical properties and it depends on the composition of both the mineral and the organic soil components. It therefore varies for different soils, e.g. within the group of mineral soils, and ranges from 2.4–2.9 g cm−3. Hence, awareness of this variability is important for properties estimated by a calculation involving particle density. Because ρS depends on both the soil's solid mineral particles and soil organic matter composition, we derived a function based on the mixture ratio of these two soil components. This approach represents a further development of earlier investigations dealing with the influence of organic carbon (Corg) on ρS. To parameterise this function, two data sets were used: (1) data from soils with Corg contents between 0% and 54.88% and corresponding values of ρS between 1.49 and 2.72 g cm−3; and (2) data from soils of 17 German long-term experiments contrasting in soil texture and in soil mineral inventory. Data set 1 was used to quantify the influence of soil organic matter on ρS, and data set 2 was used to calculate the influence of mineral matrix on ρS. The soil organic matter has two major influences on ρS: (1) via a mass effect (expressed as a mixture ratio between organic and mineral soil components); and (2) via a quality effect (expressed as calculated changes in particle density of organic soil components). Here, we calculated that with increasing content of soil organic matter (0–100%), the particle density of organic soil components rose from about 1.10 to 1.50 g cm−3, and present possible reasons for this phenomenon. Additionally, we demonstrate that the mineral matrix of the soil affects ρS especially via variations in the mineral inventory, but conclude that differences in particle size distribution of soils were to a lesser extent suitable for describing the influence of the mineral matrix on ρS. Overall, using our approach should generate more realistic values of ρS, and consequently of all calculated parameters which are sensitive to ρS.

Introduction

The particle density of soil (ρS) represents one of the soil's basic physical properties and is defined as mass per volume unit of solid soil components, i.e. excluding voids and water. The standard value of ρS that is frequently given to represent all mineral soils is 2.65 g cm−3 (Skopp, 2000), and is identical to the mean density of quartz. However, typical values for mineral soils range from 2.4–2.9 g cm−3. Therefore, awareness of this variability is important for properties estimated by a calculation involving particle density (Ball et al., 2000). This was especially so, before pedotransfer functions became a ‘white-hot’ topic for soil science and environmental research (McBratney et al., 2002). By using accurate particle density data (as calculated by our approach presented here), a soil's physical processes can be partially monitored. Moreover, because the specific heat of mineral and organic soil particles is very different, it is essential to know the mixture ratio, in order to describe the heat dynamics of soils accurately (Kuntze et al., 1994). Furthermore, the value of ρS enters into calculations of more useful soil properties like the pore volume, which can be calculated from the quotient of ρS and bulk density (Danielson and Sutherland, 1986, Riek et al., 1995); this can be used in combination with the pore size distribution to calculate transport processes in soil.

The particle density of soil depends on the composition of both the mineral and the organic soil components. In clay and heavy minerals, the particle density varies between 2.2 and 2.9 g cm−3 and 2.9 and 4.0 g cm−3, respectively (Schachtschabel et al., 1992). These values are directly affected by the mineral type, e.g. gypsum, biotite and hematite have values of 2.32, 2.80–3.20 and 4.80–5.30 g cm−3, respectively (Skopp, 2000). Hence, the particle density of mineral soil components of any given soil is an average for the distribution of the soil minerals present. For organic soil components, the particle density depends on the degree of decomposition, and ranges between 1.0 and 1.5 g cm−3 (Young and Spycher, 1979, Leuschner et al., 1981, Golchin et al., 1994, Golchin et al., 1995, Hassink, 1995, Ladd et al., 1995, Skopp, 2000, Ellies et al., 2003).

Here, our aims were (1) to calculate ρS based on the ratio between organic and mineral soil components, and (2) to quantify the influence of the composition of both the organic as well as the mineral soil components on ρS.

Section snippets

Deviation of the regression function to calculate particle density of soils

The particle density of soil ρS is defined as mass per volume unit of solid soil components (Eq. (1)):ρS=MSVSwhere: MS = mass of solid soil components [g], VS = volume of solid soil components [cm3].

The solid soil components were divided into organic matter (OM) and mineral substance (MS). Therefore, the mass of solid soil components (MS) corresponds to the sum of OM and MS masses (Eq. (2)):MS=MOM+MMSwhere: MOM = mass of OM [g], MMS = mass of MS [g].

Because ρS is estimated based on the ratio between

Parameterisation of the particle density of the mineral and organic soils components

To estimate the influence of soil organic matter on ρS, data of soils with a high variation of the Corg content were used (Table 1). Parameters employed to fit ρS(c) to ρS(m) were ρMS and ρOM (Eq. (9)), and the used value of COM was 55%. The result of the fit is shown in Fig. 1.

The calculated values for ρMS and ρOM for the sites listed in Table 1 were significant at a p level < 10−6 and amounted to 2.646 g cm−3 and 1.350 g cm−3, respectively. Because of the pattern of residuals between measured

Discussion and conclusions

Our approach to calculate the particle density of soils based on the mixture ratio between organic and mineral soil components represents a further development of earlier investigations dealing with the influence of Corg on ρS (Körschens and Greilich, 1981, Pfefferkorn and Körschens, 1991, Kahle et al., 1993, Körschens and Waldschmidt, 1995, Körschens, 1997, Körschens, 1999). Soil organic matter is a mixture of diverse components, and changes in the soil organic matter quality may be caused by

Acknowledgements

We thank Joachim Luckert (Landesamt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Brandenburg) for implementing the X-ray diffraction analyses and interpretation of its results, and Ruth Willmott (BioScript) for editing the manuscript. This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation DFG (Priority program “Soils as source and sink for CO2—mechanisms and regulation of organic matter stabilization in soils”, SPP 1090).

References (43)

  • B.C. Ball et al.

    Soil compactibility in relation to physical and organic properties at 156 sites in UK

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2000)
  • A.B. McBratney et al.

    From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems

    Geoderma

    (2002)
  • V.B. Asio

    Characteristics, weathering, formation and degradation of soils from volcanic rocks in Leyte, Philippines

    Hohenh. Bodenkundl. Hefte

    (1996)
  • J.A. Baldock et al.

    Soil organic matter

  • L. Beyer et al.

    Properties and composition of soil organic matter in forest and arable soils of Schleswig-Holstein: 1. Comparison of morphology and results of wet chemistry, CPMAS-13C-NMR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-field ionozation mass spectrometry

    Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd.

    (1992)
  • H.-P. Blume et al.

    Bestimmung von organischem Kohlenstoff und Gesamtkohlenstoff nach trockener Verbrennung (Elementaranalyse) (ISO 10694:1995).

  • H.P. Blume et al.

    Böden des Lübecker Beckens und der Hansestadt Lübeck

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1993)
  • W. Boenigk

    Schwerminerale

  • S. Borowiec et al.

    Guidebook of excursions in Poland

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1997)
  • E. Coburger et al.

    Exkursionsführer zur Tagung des AK Stadtböden am 7./8. März 1997 in Rostock

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1997)
  • R.E. Danielson et al.

    Porosity

  • A. Ellies et al.

    Organische Bodensubstanz und Benetzbarkeit von Bodenproben-eine interpretation

    J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.

    (2003)
  • O. Fränzle et al.

    Landschaften und Böden des Landesteiles Schleswig

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1993)
  • A. Golchin et al.

    Soil structure and carbon cycling

    Aust. J. Soil Res.

    (1994)
  • A. Golchin et al.

    Structural and dynamic properties of soil organic matter as reflected by 13C natural abundance, pyrolysis mass spectrometry and solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy in density fractions of an oxisol under forest and pasture

    Aust. J. Soil Res.

    (1995)
  • J. Hassink

    Decomposition rate constants of size and density fractions of soil organic matter

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1995)
  • R. Horn et al.

    Versuchsgut Hohenschulen–Bodenkundliche Untersuchungen im Rahmen des Sonderforschungsbereiches 192

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1993)
  • P. Kahle et al.

    Beeinflussung ausgewählter Bodeneigenschaften durch hohe C-Gehalte in einem Parzellenversuch auf Löß-Schwarzerde

    Z. f. Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung

    (1993)
  • R. Kiem et al.

    Strukturchemische Charakterisierung der refraktären organischen Substanz in ackerbaulichen Dauerversuchsflächen

    Mitt. Dtsch. Bodenkdl. Ges.

    (1999)
  • H. Kirchmann et al.

    Properties and classification of soils of the Swedish long-term fertility experiments: II. Sites at Örja and Orup

    Acta Agric. Scand., Sec. B. Soil Plant. Sci.

    (1993)
  • M. Kleber

    Carbon exchange in humid grassland soils

    Hohenh Bodenkundl. Hefte. Heft

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text