Analysis
The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00092-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Until recently, the majority of commercial forestry in the UK has comprised blanket planting of non-native coniferous species which typically do not offer a high level of biodiversity. However, the UK government, and consequently the UK Forestry Commission, are committed under various international agreements to conserve and enhance biodiversity in British forests. The study reported in this paper estimates that substantial non-use values would be generated if the Forestry Commission were to continue in its current efforts to develop management practices that promote an increase in biodiversity across a large area of its commercial holdings in remote parts of the country which are seldom visited. Rather than adopting a referendum-type contingent valuation method, a discrete-choice contingent ranking approach is used to estimate the general public's willingness to pay to increase the area of these forests managed under each of three forest management standards designed to offer increasing levels of biodiversity at the expense of commercial timber production. This permits relative preferences for different forest management standards to be measured at the same time as willingness to pay to enhance biodiversity.

References (23)

  • S. Beggs et al.

    Assessing the potential demand for electric cars

    J. Econometrics

    (1981)
  • P. Maille et al.

    Valuing ecotourism in Madagascar

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (1993)
  • C.A. Montgomery et al.

    The marginal cost of species preservation: the Northern Spotted Owl

    J. Environ. Econ. Manage.

    (1994)
  • K. Arrow et al.

    Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation

    Fed. Regist.

    (1993)
  • W. Dean

    With Broadaxe and Firebrand

    (1995)
  • W.H. Desvouges et al.

    A comparison of alternative approaches for estimating recreation and related benefits of water quality improvements

  • W.M. Greene

    LIMDEP Version 5.1

    (1989)
  • D.N. Gujarati

    Basic Econometrics

    (1995)
  • J. Gurland et al.

    Polychotomous quantal response in biological assay

    Biometrics

    (1960)
  • R.A. Krueger

    Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research

    (1994)
  • T.J. Lareau et al.

    Valuing WTP for diesel odor reductions: an application of contingent ranking technique

    S. Econ. J.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text