Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00324-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Measurement of city tree cover can aid in urban vegetation planning, management, and research by revealing characteristics of vegetation across a city. Urban tree cover in the United States ranges from 0.4% in Lancaster, California, to 55% in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Two important factors that affect the amount of urban tree cover are the natural environment and land use. Urban tree cover is highest in cities that developed in naturally forested areas (31%), followed by grassland cities (19%) and desert cities (10%), but showed wide variation based on individual city characteristics. Tree cover ranged from 15 to 55% for cities in forested areas, 5 to 39% for those in grassland areas, and 0.4 to 26% for cities developed in desert regions. Park and residential lands along with vacant lands in forested areas generally have the highest tree cover among different land uses. Methods of measuring urban tree cover are presented as are planning and management implications of tree-cover data.

References (34)

  • R.A. Rowntree

    Forest canopy cover and land use in four Eastern United States cities

    Urban Ecol.

    (1984)
  • R.A. Sanders

    Some determinants of urban forest structure

    Urban Ecol.

    (1984)
  • C.A. Blanche et al.

    The Baton Rouge urban forest: a structural analysis

    J. Arboric.

    (1992)
  • R.H. Canfield

    Application of the line intercept method in sampling range vegetation

    J. For.

    (1941)
  • J.F. Dwyer et al.

    Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest

    J. Arboric.

    (1992)
  • R.T. Forman et al.

    Landscape Ecology

    (1986)
  • P. Greig-Smith

    Studies in Ecology

  • H.G. Halverson

    Urban forest cover and aggregation from high-altitude aerial photographs

  • A.J. Hansen et al.

    Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows

    (1992)
  • F. Haque

    Urban forestry: 13 city profile

    Unasylva

    (1987)
  • C.E. Holscher

    City forests of Europe

    Nat. Hist.

    (1973)
  • Y.J. Huang et al.

    The wind-shielding and shading effects of trees on residential heating and cooling requirements

    ASHRAE Trans.

    (1990)
  • C.Y. Jim

    The distribution and configuration of tree cover in urban Hong Kong

    GeoJoumal

    (1989)
  • E. Kerkmann

    Tree Canopy Cover and Planting Opportunities in San Jose, California

    (1995)
  • A.W. Küchler

    Vegetation Mapping

    (1967)
  • A.W. Küchler

    Potential natural vegetation

  • Cited by (291)

    • The disparity in tree cover and ecosystem service values among redlining classes in the United States

      2022, Landscape and Urban Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the United States and Canada, 2/3 of the existing urban forest comes from natural regeneration, with natural regeneration decreasing in more managed land uses (e.g. residential lands) and in dryer regions (Nowak, 2012). Land use patterns and associated land management, including redlining practices, are the second most dominant factors affecting tree cover (behind the surrounding natural environment) as they determine the space available for trees and management activities that facilitate or limit tree cover (Nowak et al., 1996). A dominant factor of land use that affects tree cover is percent of the area occupied by impervious surfaces.

    • Climatic factors dominate the spatial patterns of urban green space coverage in the contiguous United States

      2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text