Elsevier

Ultrasonics

Volume 36, Issue 7, May 1998, Pages 813-824
Ultrasonics

Dynamic elastic anisotropy and nonlinearity in wood and rock

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(98)00004-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Ultrasonic techniques are used to characterize the anisotropic and nonlinear elastic behavior of wood and rock and to interrogate the structural properties of these materials. For elastic anisotropy two types of experiments are performed, namely qP-wave velocity measurements on spherical samples in about 100 directions of propagation rather regularly sampled in space, together with S-wave birefringence measurements in a few directions on additional samples. For nonlinear elasticity, acoustoelastic experiments were conducted, consisting in P and S-wave velocity measurements under controlled confining pressure. The experimental results show that wood exhibits much larger elastic anisotropy, but much weaker elastic nonlinearity than rock. For instance, the deviations from isotropy in wood can reach 70%, whereas in rock, typically, it can hardly exceed 20%. In contrast, regarding nonlinearity the increase of P or S-wave moduli per unit confining pressure in wood is always smaller than 30, in the radial direction, or 10, in the longitudinal and transversal directions, whereas it can reach roughly one to a few hundreds in rock.

These contrasted behaviors can be simply explained by structural considerations. Thus, the exceptionally strong elastic anisotropy of wood is due to the strict structural alignment of its constituents, that is to say to the preferential orientation of the anatomical elements (tracheids, fibers, ray cells, vessels etc.) for ‘textural’ anisotropy, and to the cellular wall organisation for ‘microstructural’ anisotropy. In comparison, rock only exhibits a rough statistics of the orientation distribution function of its constituents, mainly the grain minerals, the pores and the cements. In contrast, the strinkingly strong nonlinear elastic response of rock, a wellestablished classical observation, is due to the presence of compliant mechanical defects (cracks, microfractures, grain-joints etc.). Such features are practically nonexistent in wood which explains its weak nonlinear response.

References (27)

  • K. Helbig

    Foundations of anisotropy for exploration seismics

  • D. Fengel et al.

    Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions

    (1989)
  • F.F. Krause et al.

    Multiscale anatomy of a reservoir: geologic characterization of Pembona—Cardium Pool

  • H.H. Haldorsen et al.

    Challenges in reservoir characterization

    Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol.

    (1993)
  • R.T. Arts

    A study of general anisotropic elasticity in rocks by wave propagation. Theoretical and experimental aspects

  • D. Noak et al.

    On the theory of elasticity of the orthotropic material wood

    Wood Sci. Technol.

    (1976)
  • S.G. Lekhnitskii

    Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Body

    (1981)
  • R.T. Arts et al.

    Complete inversion of the anisotropic elastic tensor in rocks

  • R.J. Arts et al.

    General anisotropic elastic tensor in rocks—approximation, invariants and particular directions

  • N. Lucet et al.

    Effects of heterogeneities and anisotropy on sonic and ultrasonic attenuation in rocks

    Geophysics

    (1992)
  • C. Truesdell

    Problems of Nonlinear Elasticity

    (1965)
  • R.E. Green

    Ultrasonic Investigation of Mechanical Properties

    (1973)
  • K. Brugger

    Pure mode for elastic waves in crystals

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1965)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Generation of transversal envelope soliton in polymeric and wooden rods

      2014, Ultrasonics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Usually it is not easy to identify the orthogonal directions and single spherical samples [40] have to be machined from the investigated cylindrical rod. Sometimes cubic samples [41–43] are used and still we are not sure that reference coordinates system relative to the axes of anisotropy was perpendicular on the faces of the cube. Usually an “eight” angular diagram describes the polar variations of the velocity in the plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation [40,44].

    • Wood elastic characterization from a single sample by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy

      2012, Ultrasonics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fast measurements can be obtained by using different techniques based on ultrasonic (or acoustic) wave propagations in direct contact [3,4] or in a coupling medium (e.g., water) with a protective coating if dry wood properties have to be measured [5,6]. These techniques allow the determination of the diagonal terms of the elastic tensor on a unique parallelepipedic sample [7] but, except in some cases with a polyhedral [8] or spherical samples [6,9], they usually require other samples, and/or coupling with other kind of measurements, for the determination of off-diagonal terms [10–14]. Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) could offer a good alternative because the determination of the entire specimen elastic constants can be obtained from only one sample thanks to non-contact measurements of its resonant frequencies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text