Abstract
There is emerging agreement that sustainability challenges require new ways of knowledge production and decision-making. One key aspect of sustainability science, therefore, is the involvement of actors from outside academia into the research process in order to integrate the best available knowledge, reconcile values and preferences, as well as create ownership for problems and solution options. Transdisciplinary, community-based, interactive, or participatory research approaches are often suggested as appropriate means to meet both the requirements posed by real-world problems as well as the goals of sustainability science as a transformational scientific field. Dispersed literature on these approaches and a variety of empirical projects applying them make it difficult for interested researchers and practitioners to review and become familiar with key components and design principles of how to do transdisciplinary sustainability research. Starting from a conceptual model of an ideal–typical transdisciplinary research process, this article synthesizes and structures such a set of principles from various strands of the literature and empirical experiences. We then elaborate on them, looking at challenges and some coping strategies as experienced in transdisciplinary sustainability projects in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The article concludes with future research needed in order to further enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Adapted from Matthias Bergmann’s presentation at the launching conference of the International Network for Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity (INIT) in Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 2011.
Not all of the projects we draw from used the term “transdisciplinary” nor did all of the projects meet all design principles; however, the basic intention of all projects was (explicit or not) to comply with the requirements of the above definition of transdisciplinary research.
See: http://www.cces.ethz.ch/projects/sulu/MOUNTLAND. See also Wiek et al. (2012).
Personal observations; project documentation available at: http://www.sdinet.org/country/malawi/.
References
Baumgärtner S, Becker C, Frank K, Müller B, Quaas M (2008) Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: the role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecol Econ 67:384–393
Becker E (2006) Problem transformations in transdisciplinary research. In: Hirsch Hadorn G (ed) Unity of knowledge in transdisciplinary research for sustainability. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) Publishers, Oxford, UK. Available online at: http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C04/E6-49-02-01.pdf
Bergmann M, Jahn T (2008) CITY:mobil: a model for integration in sustainability research. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 89–102
Bergmann M, Brohmann B, Hoffmann E, Loibl MC, Rehaag R, Schramm E, Voß J-P (2005) Quality criteria of transdisciplinary research. A guide for the formative evaluation of research projects. ISOE-Studientexte, No 13, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Bergmann M, Jahn T, Knobloch T, Krohn W, Pohl C, Schramm E (2010) Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ein Überblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Berkhout FGH (2006) Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 18:299–311
Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ, Horsey BL (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60:726–742
Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov Higher Education 36:107–124
Bunders JFG, Broerse JEW, Keil F, Pohl Ch, Scholz RW, Zweekhorst BM (2010) How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: in't Veld RJ (ed) Knowledge democracy-consequences for science, politics and media. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 125–152
Cape Higher Education Consortium (CHEC) et al (2011) Cape Town Central City Provincial Government Regeneration Initiative. Cape Higher Education Consortium, Cape Town. Available online at: http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.net/newsdocs/documents/cat_view/23-research-a-project-outputs
Carew AL, Wickson F (2010) The TD wheel: a heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:1146–1155. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.02
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Gurston DH et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061
Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, Dickson NM et al (2011) Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108
Cloos L, Trutnevyte E, Bening C, Hendrichs H, Wallquist L, Stauffacher M et al (2010) Energiestrategien kleiner Gemeinden und kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Der Fall Urnäsch im Kanton Appenzell Ausserrhoden. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2009. TdLab, Zürich
Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás SV (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15(4):38
Defila R, Di Giulio A, Scheuermann M (2006) Forschungsverbundmanagement. Handbuch für die Gestaltung inter- und transdisziplinärer Projekte. vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Dunn CE, Le Mare A, Makungu C (2011) Malaria risk behaviours, socio-cultural practices and rural livelihoods in southern Tanzania: implications for bednet usage. Soc Sci Med 72(3):408–417
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123
Fraser MW, Richman JM, Galinsky MJ, Day SH (2009) Intervention research: developing social programs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755
Gatzweiler FW (2005) Institutionalising biodiversity conservation—the case of Ethiopian coffee forests. Conserv Soc 3(1):201–223
Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402(6761 Suppl):C81–C84
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London, UK
Gray B (2008) Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. Am J Prev Med 35:S124–S132
Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128
Hyman K (2011) Economic development, decoupling and urban infrastructure: the role of innovation for an urban transition in Cape Town. Masters Thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Available online at: http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/79
Jahn T (2008) Transdisciplinarity in the practice of research. In: Bergmann M, Schramm E (eds) Transdisziplinäre Forschung: Integrative Forschungsprozesse verstehen und bewerten. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, pp 21–37
Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E et al (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82
Kasemir B, Jäger J, Jaeger CC, Gardner MT (2003) Public participation in sustainability science: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Kates RW, Parris TM (2003) Long-term trends and a sustainability transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8062–8067
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 291:641–642
Keil F (2009) Reflexive transdisciplinarity. Producing knowledge for sustainable development. Presentation at the International Conference “Towards a Knowledge Democracy”, Leiden, the Netherlands, 25–27 August 2009
Keller A (2012) Conceptualising an alternative energy trajectory for in situ informal settlement upgrading: the case of Enkanini. School of Public Leadership, thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of Mphil in sustainable development planning and management, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Available online at: http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/79
Kim J, Oki T (2011) Visioneering: an essential framework in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(2):247–251
Klein JT (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med 35:S116–S123
Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6
Krütli P, Flüeler T, Stauffacher M, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2010a) Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland). J Integr Environ Sci 7(3):229–244
Krütli P, Stauffacher M, Flüeler T, Scholz RW (2010b) Functional–dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. J Risk Res 13(7):861–875
Laws D, Scholz RW, Shiroyama H, Susskind L, Suzuki T, Weber O (2004) Expert views on sustainability and technology implementation. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 11(3):247–261
Maasen S, Lieven O (2006) Transdisciplinarity: a new mode of governing science? Sci Public Policy 33(6):399–410
Martens P (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2:1–5
Ng’ang’a PN, Jayasinghe G, Kimani V, Shililu J, Kabutha C, Kabuage L et al (2009) Bed net use and associated factors in a rice farming community in Central Kenya. Malar J 8:64. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-64
Parodi O, Preiser K, Schweizer-Ries P, Wendl M (1998) When night falls on Balde de Leyes—the success story of an integrated approach in PV rural electrification. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion, Vienna, Austria, 6–10 July 1998
Pohl C (2011) What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures 43(6):618–626
Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. oekom, Munich, Germany
Pregernig M (2007) Impact assessment of transdisciplinary research: in need of a more distanced view. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16(1):46–51
Raven RPJM, Mourik RM, Feenstra CFJ, Heiskanen E (2009) Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: towards a toolkit methodology for project managers. Energy 34:564–574
Regeer BJ, Hoes A-C, van Amstel-van Saane M, Caron-Flinterman FF, Bunders JFG (2009) Six guiding principles for evaluating mode-2 strategies for sustainable development. Am J Eval 30:515–537
Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackmann H, Lee YT, Mokhele K et al (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330(6006):916–917
Robinson J (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839–856
Robinson J, Tansey J (2006) Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project. Sci Public Policy 33:151–160
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475
Rotmans J, Van Asselt M (1996) Integrated assessment: a growing child on its way to maturity. Clim Change 34:327–336
Russell AW, Wickson F, Carew AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40(5):460–472
Savan B, Sider D (2003) Contrasting approaches to community-based research and a case study of community sustainability in Toronto, Canada. Local Environ 8:303–316
Schmitt CB, Senbeta F, Denich M, Preisinger H, Boehmer HJ (2010) Wild coffee management and plant diversity in the montane rainforest of southwestern Ethiopia. Afr J Ecol 48:78–86
Schneidewind U, Ernst A, Lang DJ (2011) Institutions for transformative research. The formation of the NaWis alliance. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 20:133–135 (editorial material)
Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society. From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Scholz RW, Stauffacher M (2007) Managing transition in clusters: area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss prealpine region. Environ Plann A 39:2518–2539
Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 7:226–251
Scholz RW, Spörri A, Lang DJ (2009) Problem structuring for transitions: the case of Swiss waste management. Futures 41:171–181
Siebenhüner B (2004) Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? Int J Sustain Dev 7:146–163
Skagen Ekeli K (2006) The principle of liberty and legal representation of posterity. Res Publica 12:385-409
Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38:275–287
Spoerri A, Lang DJ, Binder CR, Scholz RW (2009) Expert-based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning—C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Resour Conserv Recycling 53:592–600
Stauffacher M (2010) Beyond neocorporatism?! Transdisciplinary case studies as a means for collaborative learning in sustainable development. In: Gross M, Heinrichs H (eds) Environmental sociology. European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp 201–216
Stauffacher M, Flüeler T, Krütli P, Scholz RW (2008) Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. System Pract Action Res 21:409–422
Stokols D, Hall KL, Moser RP, Feng A, Misra S, Taylor BK (2010) Evaluating cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: conceptual, methodological, and translational perspectives. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C (eds) Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 471–493
Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Change 14:137–146
Talwar S, Wiek A, Robinson J (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38:379–390
Tavener-Smith L (2012) Informal settlements in Stellenbosch. In: Sebitosi B, Swilling M (eds) Stellenbosch 2030. Sun Media, Stellenbosch, South Africa (in press)
Thompson Klein J (2010) A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman R, Thompson Klein J, Mitcham C (eds) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 15–30
Trutnevyte E, Stauffacher M, Scholz RW (2011) Supporting energy initiatives in small communities by linking visions with energy scenarios and multi-criteria assessment. Energy Policy 39:7884–7895
van den Hove S (2006) Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy 23:10–17
van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:445–477
van Zeijl-Rozema A, Martens P (2011) Integrated monitoring of sustainable development. Sustain J Rec 4(4):199–202
Walter AI, Helgenberger S, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2007) Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. Eval Program Plann 30:325–338
Walz A, Braendle J, Lang DJ, Brand F, Briner S, Elkin CH Experience from customising IPCC scenarios to specific national-level focus scenarios for ecosystem service management. Technol Forecast Soc Change (submitted)
Weaver PM, Rotmans J (2006) Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1:284–303
Wiek A (2007) Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation—experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16:52–57
Wiek A (2009) Analyzing, evaluating, and designing participatory research in sustainability science. Working paper, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Wiek A, Walter A (2009) A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. Eur J Oper Res 197(1):360–370
Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2011) Creating and crafting sustainability visions. Working paper, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Wiek A, Binder C, Scholz RW (2006) Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures 38:740–766
Wiek A, Scheringer M, Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G, Valsangiacomo A (2007) Joint problem identification and structuring in environmental research. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 16:72–74
Wiek A, Ries R, Thabrew L, Brundiers K, Wickramasinghe A (2010) Challenges of sustainable recovery processes in tsunami affected communities. Disaster Prev Manage 19:423–437
Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6:203–218
Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl). doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y
Zajíkovà Z, Martens P (2007) A participatory approach in regional sustainable development of the Slovak Republic: a case study of the Spiš region. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 6:310–322
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this article. Furthermore, we want to thank Christopher Lüderitz and Rob Cutter for their helpful assistance. We acknowledge the feedback from the participants in the session on “Solution-oriented transdisciplinary research for sustainable development” at the 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Science (ICSS 2010), Sapienza University Rome, Italy, June 23–25, 2010, on critical issues discussed in this article. Arnim Wiek acknowledges support through the Swiss National Science Foundation grant PA0011-115315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Francesca Farioli, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M. et al. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7 (Suppl 1), 25–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x