Skip to main content
Log in

The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This collaborative essay grows out of a debate about the relationship between aesthetics and ecology and the possibility of an “ecological aesthetic” that affects landscape planning, design, and management. We describe our common understandings and unresolved questions about this relationship, including the importance of aesthetics in understanding and affecting landscape change and the ways in which aesthetics and ecology may have either complementary or contradictory implications for a landscape. To help understand these issues, we first outline a conceptual model of the aesthetics–ecology relationship. We posit that:

1. While human and environmental phenomena occur at widely varying scales, humans engage with environmental phenomena at a particular scale: that of human experience of our landscape surroundings. That is the human “perceptible realm.”

2. Interactions within this realm give rise to aesthetic experiences, which can lead to changes affecting humans and the landscape, and thus ecosystems.

3. Context affects aesthetic experience of landscapes. Context includes both effects of different landscape types (wild, agricultural, cultural, and metropolitan landscapes) and effects of different personal–social situational activities or concerns. We argue that some contexts elicit aesthetic experiences that have traditionally been called “scenic beauty,” while other contexts elicit different aesthetic experiences, such as perceived care, attachment, and identity.

Last, we discuss how interventions through landscape planning, design, and management; or through enhanced knowledge might establish desirable relationships between aesthetics and ecology, and we examine the controversial characteristics of such ecological aesthetics. While these interventions may help sustain beneficial landscape patterns and practices, they are inherently normative, and we consider their ethical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected references for further reading

  1. Daniel TC (2001a) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plann 54:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel TC (2001b) Aesthetic preferences and ecological sustainability. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forests and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fry G, Sarlov-Herlin I (1997) The ecological and amenity functions of woodland edges in the agricultural landscape; a basis for design and management. Landsc Urban Plann 37:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gobster PH (1995) Aldo Leopold’s ecological esthetic: integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. J For 93:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gobster PH (1999) An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landsc J 18:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gobster PH (2001a) Foreword. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forests and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gobster PH (2001b) Visions of nature: conflict and compatibility in urban park restoration. Landscape Urban Plann 56:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC (2005) Landscape aesthetics: what’s ecology got to do with it? In: Lange E, Miller D (eds) Proceedings of our shared landscape: integrating ecological, socio-economic and aesthetic aspects in landscape planning and management. Ascona, Switzerland, May 2–May 6, 2005. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, pp 42–44

  9. Hill, D., Daniel, TC (in press) Foundations for an ecological aesthetic: can information alter landscape preferences? Soc Nat Res

  10. Nassauer JI (1992) The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landsc Ecol 6:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nassauer JI (1993) Ecological function and the perception of suburban residential landscapes. In: Gobster PH (ed) Managing urban and high use recreation settings, Gen Tech Rep NC-163, USDA Forest Service North Central For Exp Stn, St. Paul, pp 55–60

  12. Nassauer JI (1995a) Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landsc J 14:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nassauer JI (1995b) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 10:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nassauer JI (1997) Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In: Nassauer JI (ed) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 65–83

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ode ÅK, Fry G (2002) Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For Urban Greening 1:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palang H, Fry G (eds) (2003) Landscape interfaces: cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parsons R, Daniel TC (2002) Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landsc Urban Plann 60:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc Res 31:229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Eckart Lange and David Miller for providing a forum for us to first debate these issues at the Our Shared Landscape Conference they organized, Bärbel and Gunther Tress for encouraging us to publish our work, and Rob Ribe and Jim Palmer for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul H. Gobster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C. et al. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landscape Ecol 22, 959–972 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x

Keywords

Navigation