Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves

  • Environmental control of photosynthesis
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photosynthetic CO2-fixation rates, chlorophyll content, chloroplast ultrastructure and other leaf characteristics (e.g. variable fluorescence, stomata density, soluble carbohydrate content) were studied in a comparative way in sun and shade leaves of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and in high-light and low-light seedlings.

  1. 1.

    Sun leaves of the beech possess a smaller leaf area, higher dry weight, lower water content, higher stomata density, higher chlorophyll a/b ratios and are thicker than the shade leaves. Sun leaves on the average contain more chlorophyll in a leaf area unit; the shade leaf exhibits more chlorophyll on a dry weight basis. Sun leaves show higher rates for dark respiration and a higher light saturation of photosynthetic CO2-fixation. Above 2000 lux they are more efficient in photosynthetic quantum conversion than the shade leaves.

  2. 2.

    The development of HL-radish plants proceeds much faster than that of LL-plants. The cotyledons of HL-plants show a higher dry weight, lower water content, a higher ratio of chlorophyll a/b and a higher gross photosynthesis rate than the cotyledons of the LL-plants, which possess a higher chlorophyll content per dry weight basis. The large area of the HL-cotyledon on the one hand, as well as the higher stomata density and the higher respiration rate in the LL-cotyledon on the other hand, are not in agreement with the characteristics of sun and shade leaves respectively.

  3. 3.

    The development, growth and wilting of wheat leaves and the appearance of the following leaves (leaf succession) is much faster at high quanta fluence rates than in weak light. The chlorophyll content is higher in the HL-leaf per unit leaf area and in the LL-leaf per g dry weight. There are no differences in the stomata density and leaf area between the HL- and LL-leaf. There are fewer differences between HL- and LL-leaves than in beech or radish leaves.

  4. 4.

    The chloroplast ultrastructure of shade-type chloroplasts (shade leaves, LL-leaves) is not only characterized by a much higher number of thylakoids per granum and a higher stacking degree of thylakoids, but also by broader grana than in sun-type chloroplasts (sun leaves, HL-leaves). The chloroplasts of sun leaves and of HL-leaves exhibit large starch grains.

  5. 5.

    Shade leaves and LL-leaves exhibit a higher maximum chlorophyll fluorescence and it takes more time for the fluorescence to decline to the steady state than in sun and HL-leaves. The variable fluorescence VF (ratio of fluorescence decrease to steady state fluorescence) is always higher in the sun and HL-leaf of the same physiological stage (maximum chlorophyll content of the leaf) than in the shade and LL-leaf. The fluorescence emission spectra of sun and HL-leaves show a higher proportion of chlorophyli fluorescence in the second emission maximum F2 than shade and LL-leaves.

  6. 6.

    The level of soluble carbohydrates (reducing sugars) is significantly higher in sun and HL-leaves than in shade and LL-leaves and even reflects changes in the amounts of the daily incident light.

  7. 7.

    Some but not all characteristics of mature sun and shade leaves are found in HL- and LL-leaves of seedlings. Leaf thickness, dry weight, chlorophyll content, soluble carbohydrate level, photosynthetic CO2-fixation, height and width of grana stacks and starch content, are good parameters to describe the differences between LL- and HL-leaves; with some reservations concerning age and physiological stage of leaf, a/b ratios, chlorophyll content per leaf area unit and the variable fluorescence are also suitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a+b:

chlorophyll a+b

a/b:

ratio chlorophyll a/b

CPI:

P700 containing chlorophyll a-protein

dw:

drv weight

fw:

fresh weight

HL-plant:

high-light plant

LL-plant:

low-light plant

klux:

kilolux

HL-leaf:

leaf from a high-light plant

LL-leaf:

leaf from a low-light plant

References

  1. Abel, B (1956) Über die Beeinflussung der Chloroplastenstruktur durch Licht bei Antirrhinum majus (haploid). Naturwissenschaften 43: 136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abel, B (1962) Zur Relation Plastidengröße/Granazahl und zur Bestimmung des Wassergehaltes und der Lamellendicke an Chloroplasten von haploiden Antirrhium majus, Sippe. 50. Z Botanik 50: 60–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, JM, Goodchild, DJ and Boardman, NK (1973) Composition of the photosystems and chlorophyll structure in extreme shade plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 325: 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantine, JEM, Forde, BJ (1970) The effect of light intensity and temperature on plant growth and chloroplast ultrastructure in soybean. Am J Bot 57: 1150–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Björkman, O and Holmgren, P (1963) Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol Plant 16: 889–914.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Björkman, O (1968) Carboxydismutase activity in shade-adapted and sun-adapted species of higher plants. Physiol Plant 21: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Björkman, O (1979) Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis. In Marcelle, R, ed. Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis, pp 1–16. The Hague: Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Björkman, O, Boardman, NK, Anderson, JM, Thorne, SW, Goodchild, DJ and Pyliotis, NA (1972) Effect of light intensity during growth of Atriplex patula on the capacity of photosynthetic reactions, chloroplast components and structure. Carnegie Institution Year Book 71: 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boardman, NK, Björkman, O, Anderson, JM, Goodchild, DJ and Thorne, SW (1975) Photosynthetic adaptation of higher plants to light intensity: relationship between chloroplast structure, composition of the photosystems and photosynthetic rates. In Avron, M, ed. Proc 3rd Int Congr on Photosynthesis, Vol III, pp 1809–1827. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boardman, NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 28: 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruner, RL (1964) Determination of reducing value (3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method). In Whistler, R, ed. Method in carbohydrate chemistry 4, p 6771. New York. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Budde, H (1923) Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie des Biattes auf Grund volumetrischer Messungen. Bot Arch 4: 443–487.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burnside, CA and Böhning, RH (1957) The effect of prolonged shading on the light saturation curves of apparent photosynthesis in sun plants. Plant Physiol 32: 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buschmann, C, Meier, D, Kleudgen, HK and Liehtenthaler, HK (1978) Regulation of chloroplast development by red and blue light. Photochem Photobiol 27: 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buschmann, C and Lichtenthaler, HK (1979) The influence of phytohormones on prenyllipid composition and photosynthetic activity of thylakoids. In Appelqvist, LA and Liljenberg, C, eds. Advances in the biochemistry and physiology of plant lipids, pp 145–150. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, Biomedical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butler, Wl (1978) Energy distribution in the photochemical apparatus of photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29: 345–378.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Butterfass, T (1979) Patterns of chloroplast reproduction, pp 92–97, Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duysens, LMN and Sweers, HE (1963) Mechanism of two photochemical reactions in algae as studied by means of fluorescence. In Jap Soc of Plant Physiol, ed. Microalage and photosynthetic bacteria, pp 353–372. Tokyo: Univ of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Egle, K (1937) Zur Kenntnis des Lichtfeldes der Pflanzen und der Blattfarbstoffe. Planta 26: 546–583.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fedtke, C (1973) Effects of the herbicide methabenzthiazuron on the physiology of wheat plants. Pestic Sci 4: 653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fedtke, C, Deichgräber, G and Schnepf, E (1977) Herbicide induced changes in wheat chloroplast ultrastructure and chlorophyll a/b ratio. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 171: 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fedtke, C (1979) Plant physiological adaptations induced by low rates of photosynthesis. Z Naturforsch 34c: 932–935.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fedtke, C 1979). Physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max) plants to metribuzin. Weed Sci 27: 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fork, DC and Govindjee (1980) Chlorophyll a fluorescence transients of leaves from sun and shade plants. Naturwissenschaften 67: 510–511.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goryshina, TK (1980) Structural and functional features of the leaf assimilatory apparatus in plants of a forest-steppe oakwood. Acta Oecol 1: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grahl, H and Wild, A (1973) Lichtinduzierte Veränderungen im Photosynthese-Apparat von Sinapis alba. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 86: 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grahl, H and Wild, A (1975) Studies on the content of P-700 and cytochromes in Sinapis alba during growth under two different light intensities. In Marcelle, R, ed. Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis, pp 107–113. The Hague. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guillot-Salomon, T, Tuquet, C, Lubac, Mde, Hallais, M-F and Signol, M (1978) Analyse comparative de l'ultrastructure et de la composition lipidique des chloroplasts de plantes d'ombre et de soleil. Cytobiology 17: 442–452.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guillot-Salomon, T, Tuquet, C, Lubac, Mde, Hallais, M-F and Signol, M (1979) Ultrastructure and lipid composition of chloroplasts of shade and sun plants. In Appelqvist, LA and Liljenberg, C, eds. Advances in the biochemistry and physiology of plant lipids, pp 169–174. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kausch, W and Haas, W (1965) Chemische Unterschiede zwischen Sonnen- und Schattenblättern der Blutbuche (Fagus sylvatica L. cv. Atropunicea). Naturwissenschaften 52: 214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kautsky, H and Hirsch, A (1931) Neue Versuche zur Kohlensäureassimüation. Die Naturwissenschaften 19: 964.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kirk, JTO and Tilney-Bassett, RAE (1978) The plastids: their chemistry, structure, growth and inheritance, p 792. London: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lavorel, J and Etienne, A-L (1977) In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence. In: Barber, J, ed. Primary processes of photosynthesis, pp 203–268. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lichtenthaler, HK (1971) Die unterschiedliche Synthese der lipophilen Plastidenchinone in Sonnen- und Schattenblättern von Fagus sylvatica L. Z Naturforsch 26b: 832–842.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lichtenthaler HK and Straub V (1975) Die Bildung von Lipochinonen in Gewebekulturen. Planta Medica Suppl 198–213.

  36. Lichtenthaler, HK, Karunen, P and Grumbach, KH (1977) Determination of prenylquinones in green photosynthetic active moss and liver moss tissues. Physiol Plant 40: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lichtenthaler, HK and Buschmann, C (1978) Control of chloroplast development by red light, blue light and phytohormones. In Akoyunoglou, G et al., eds. Chloroplast development: developments in plant biology, Vol 2 pp 801–816. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lichtenthaler, HK (1979) Effect of biocides on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus of radish seedlings grown under strong and weak light conditions. Z Naturforsch 34c: 936–940.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lichtenthaler, HK (1979) Occurrence and function of prenyllipids in the photosynthetic membrane. In Appelqvist, LA and Liljenberg, C, eds. Advances in the biochemistry and physiology of plant lipids, pp 57–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lichtenthaler, HK (1980) Prenylquinones in plant leaves. In Mazliak, P et al. eds. Advances in the biogenesis and function of plant lipids, pp 299–310. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lichtenthaler, HK, Burkhard, G, Grumbach, KH, and Meier, D (1980) Physiological effects of photosystem-II-herbicides on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynthesis Res 1: 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lichtenthaler, HK, Buschmann, C and Rahmsdorf, U (1980) The Importance of blue light for the development of sun-type chloroplasts. In Senger, H, ed. The blue light syndrome, pp 485–494. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lichtenthaler HK (1981) Adaptation of leaves and chloroplasts to high quanta fluence rates. In Akoyunoglou G et al., eds. Proc 5th Int Congr on Photosynthesis, in press.

  44. Masarovicova, E and Minarcic, P (1979) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Fagus sylvatica L. leaves. I. Anatomical characteristic and photosynthetic activity. Biologia 34: 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Meier D and Lichtenthaler HK (1981) Differences in ultrastructure and composition of chloroplasts from radish seedlings grown in strong light, weak light and under the influence of bentazon. In Akoyunoglou G et al., eds. Proc 5th Int Congr on Photosynthesis, in press.

  46. Meier, D, Lichtenthaler, HK and Burkard, G (1980) Change of chloroplast ultrastructure in radish seedlings under the influence of the photosystem-II-herbicide bentazon. Z Naturforsch 35c: 656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nordhausen, M (1909) deÜber Sonnen- und Schattenblätter. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 21: 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Palade, GE (1952) A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med 95: 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Papageorgiou, G (1975) Chlorophyll fluorescence an intrinsic probe at photosynthesis. In Govindjee, ed. Bioenergetics of photosynthesis, pp 319–371. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Prenzel, U, Lichtenthaler, HK and Meier, D (1980) Level of chlorophyll b and of the light-harvesting-chlorophyll-protein complex in Raphanus seedlings grown at different light quanta fluence rates. In Mazliak, P et al., eds. Recent advances in the biogenesis and function of plant lipids, pp 369–372. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reynolds, ES (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 17: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schiff, JA, Zeldin, MH and Rubman, J (1967) Chlorophyll formation and photosynthetic competence in Euglena during light-induced chloroplast development in presence of 3,(3,4-dichlorophenyl) 1,1-dimethyl urea (DCMU). Plant Physiol 42: 1716–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schreiber, U, Fink, R and Vidaver, W (1977) Fluorescence induction in whole leaves. Differentiation between the two leaf side and adaptation to different light regimes. Planta 133: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schulze, ED (1970) Der CO2-Gaswechsel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Abhängigkeit von den Klimafaktoren im Freiland. Flora 159: 177–232.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Seybold, A and Egle, K (1937) Lichtfeld und Blattfarbstoffe I. Planta 26: 491–515.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Skene, DS (1974) Chloroplast structure in mature apple leaves grown under different levels of illumination and their response to changed illumination. Proc Roy Soc Lond 186: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Spurr, AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. I. Ultrastruct Res 26: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Strasser, RJ (1978) The grouping model of plant photosynthesis. In Akoyunoglou, A and Argyroudi-Akoyunoglou, JH, eds. Chloroplast development, pp 513–524. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Straub, V and Lichtenthaler, HK (1973) Die Wirkung von β-Indolessingsäure auf die Bildung der Chloroplastenpigmente, Plastidenchinone und Anthocyane in Raphanus-Keimlingen. Z Pflanzenphysiol 70: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Verbeek, L and Lichtenthaler, HK (1973) Der Einfluß von Stickstoffmangel auf die Lipochinon- und Isoprenoidsynthese der Chloroplasten von Hordeum vulgare L. Z Pflanzenphysiol 70: 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wild, A, Rühle, W and Grahl, H (1975) The effect of light intensity during growth of Sinapis alba on the electron transport and the noncyclic photophosphorylation. In Marcelle, R, ed. Environmental and biological control of photosynthesis, pp 115–121. The Hague: Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wild, A and Zerbe, R (1977) The effects of different light intensities on the nitrate reductase activity, the concentration of soluble proteins and soluble reducing sugars of Sinapis alba during growth from the germination to the flowering of the plants. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 171: 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wild, A (1979) Physiology of photosynthesis in higher plants. The adaptation of photosynthesis to light intensity and light quality in higher plants. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 92: 341–364.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wild, A and Wolf, G (1980) The effect of different light intensities on the frequency and size of stomata, the size of cells, the number, size and chlorophyll content of chloroplasts in the mesophyll and the guard cells during the ontogeny of primary leaves of Sinapis alba. Z Pflanzenphysiol 97: 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zerbe, R and Wild, A (1980) The effect of kinetin on the photosynthetic apparatus of Sinapis alba. Photosynthesis Res 1: 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ziegler, R and Egle, K (1965) Zur quantitativen Analyse der Chloroplastenpigmente, I: Kritische Überprüfung der spektralphotometrischen Chlorophyllbestimmung; Beitr Biol Pflanz 41: 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botanisches Institut der Universität, Kaiserstraße 12, D-7500, Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Germany

    H. K. Lichtenthaler, C. Buschmann, M. Döll, H.-J. Fietz, T. Bach, U. Kozel, D. Meier & U. Rahmsdorf

Authors
  1. H. K. Lichtenthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Buschmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Döll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H.-J. Fietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Bach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. U. Kozel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. U. Rahmsdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lichtenthaler, H.K., Buschmann, C., Döll, M. et al. Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves. Photosynth Res 2, 115–141 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028752

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028752

Key words

Search

Navigation