Appendix Table 1.

Urban tree mortality rates for planting cohort monitoring studies.

Time period t is years since planting. Rates were reported directly in the studies, except those with †, which were calculated using data provided in the study. When a range of mortality and time periods were reported, the maximum and minimum values were used in calculations. Cohort studies that provided a range for time since planting are considered multi-year cohorts.

CitationLocation (City and state)Sample type(s) and sample size (no)Time t (yrs)Annual mortality qannual (%) [cumulative survivorship lt (%)]Study notes
Impens and Delcarte (1979)Brussels, BelgiumStreet trees
   1974 (2300)
   1975(3710)
   1976 (3148)
   1977 (2463)
16.5 [93.5]
10.3 [89.7]
19.7 [80.3]
8.7 [91.4]
Mix of species. Newly planted and inventoried one year after stated planting year.
Rhoads et al. (1981)Philadelphia, PAStreet trees (unk.)141.2 [85]
Nowak et al. (1990)Oakland/Berkeley, CAStreet trees
(480)
219 [66]Paper also provides mortality rates by species.
Miller and Miller (1991)WI
Milwaukee, redeveloped
Milwaukee, not redeveloped
Stevens Point
Waukesha
Street trees
(311)
(692)
(368)
(677)
4-6
4-6
4-9
4
10.4-15.8
[51.8]
7.7-11.3 [62]
3.2-7.0 [74.9]
6.5 [76.5]
Struve et al. (1995)Multiple communities, OHCurb lawn and lawn trees2-37.2-10.6 [80]Paper also provides mortality rates by species and city.
Ip (1996)Northwest Region, CanadaMixed
1 yr. old
2 yrs. old
3 yrs. old
1
2
3
10 [90]
6.7 [87]
2.7 [92]
Includes urban, rural, and agricultural trees.
Sullivan (2004)San Francisco, CAStreet trees
   (1987)
   (1869)
5
10
2.9 [86.5]
3.8 [67. 9]
Thompson et al. (2004)IA, 21 communitiesTrees in streets, parks, schoolyards (932)2-66 [91]Average annual mortality rate reported by source was 6%.
Gates and Lubar (2007)Philadelphia, PATrees in parks and streets, all species (1326)1-23.9-7.7 [92.3]
Boyce (2010)New York City, NYStreet trees in pits
   With stewardship
   Without
   stewardship
≤ 41.25
4.17
Lu et al. (2010)New York City, NYStreet trees
   Total (13,405)
   3-6 yrs. cohort (2417)
   6-8 yrs. cohort (2417)
   8-9 yrs. cohort (5935)
3-9
3-6
6-8
8-9
3.2-9.4 [74.3]
4.0-7.9 [78.2]
3.9-5.1 [73]
3.3-3.7 [73.8]
Roman and Scatena (2011)Philadelphia, PAStreet trees (151)2-102.4-11.2 [78.8]Paper also provides survivorship for different planting years, each being its own cohort.
Koeser et al. (2013)Milwaukee, WIStreet trees,
   0-10 yrs. (793)
   No construction (391)
   Construction (402)
  11-25 yrs. (895)
   No construction (686)
   Construction (219)
10

16
1.8 [83.6]
2.5 [77.9]
1.3 [81.1]
1.2 [82.6]
Koeser et al. (2014)FL, various citiesTrees in parking lots, highways, streets, lawns, parks (2354)2-51.3-3.3 [93.6]Paper also provides survivorship by species.
McPherson (2014)Los Angeles, CAstreet trees (84)
park trees (225)
yard trees (70)
4-5
3.1 [90.7]
4.6 [77.1]
4.4 [79.8]
Roman et al. (2014b)Sacramento, CASingle-family residential yard trees (370)56.6 [70.9]
Ko et al. (2015a)Sacramento, CALawn trees (317)223.8 [42.4]22-year post-plantin survivorship was 42.4%, taken from survival curve.
Proportion of trees surviving out of those actually delivered was 35.3%.
Roman et al. (2015)East Palo Alto, CA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Street trees
(568)
(150)
(94)
5.92
6.25
6.58
0.6 [96.3]
1.6 [90.7]
4.6 [73.4]
Vogt et al. (2015)Indianapolis, INCommunity planted street trees (1345)2-61.9-5.5 [89.4]
Widney et al. (2016)Detroit, MI
Indianapolis, IN
Philadelphia, PA
Street trees (4059)3-57 [79]
7 [80]
13 [59]
Authors used half-years to designate the difference between fall and spring plantings.
Yang and McBride (2003)Beijing, ChinaStreet trees11 wks.68.5 [75]Severely pruned prior to transplanting.