Table 1.

The Economic and Energy Tradeoffs Associated with Three Alternatives for Utilizing Urban Wood Waste

AlternativeCost (Dollars/day)Energy Cost (mm Btu/day)
I. Haul to Remote Landfill
    1. Fuel, labor & equipment to concentration point$12,064.0015.386a
    2. Fee, labor, handling and transport to the landfill411.216.208b
Total Cost$12,475.2121.576
II. Chip and haul to power plant
    1. Fuel, labor, and equipment to concentration yard$12,064.0015.386a
    2. Labor, handling, chipper operation275.0020.507c
    3. Chipper depreciation151.00d 
    4. Energy gained from the waste-2,265.000e-904.000
Total Cost$10,225.00868.107
III. Sell to outside firm
    1. Fuel, labor, and equipment to concentration yard$12,064.0015.386
    2. Labor, handling, and chipper operation275.0020.507
    3. Chipper depreciation151.00 
    4. Revenue to firm for chips sold at $1.25/ton-152.00
Total Cost$12,348.0035.893
  • a Breakdown for this energy cost into its elements are (1) transportation, 69,450 Btu/ton, (2) chipping, 51.250 Btu/ton, (3) equipment, 15,800 Btu/ton, and (4) 113 tons processed per day for a 265-day year.

  • b Breakdown is as follows: (1) transport, 4.618 mm Btu/day and (2) handling, 1.590 mm Btu/day.

  • c Breakdown is as follows: (1) transport, 6.2 mm Btu/day, (2) chipping, 2.904 mm Btu/day, and (3) handling, 11.385 mm Btu/day

  • d Initial cost of chipper was $200,000. It is assumed that its value will decrease (straight line) to zero in five years.

  • e Energy value was calculated as follows: oil cost=$20/bbl, oil firing efficiency=82.5%, wood firing efficiency=62%, and oil energy content=6 mm Btu/bbl.