Leaf injury ratings | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Burlingame | San Mateo | ||||||||||||||||||
Year | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | ||||||||||
Month | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug | June | Aug |
1) 2% carbaryl 1× | 2.0 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
2) 1% carbaryl 1× | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.7 |
3) 2% carbaryl 2× | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 2.4 |
4) 1 % carbaryl 2× | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.7 |
5) CONTROL | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 |
Foliar* (fluvalinate applied in June) | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
↵* Foliar applications were not a formal treatment in this study. Values are presented to give a relative injury rating comparison with trunk banding. Applications were made in Woodside, California (Approximately 15 miles SW of San Mateo).