Table 1.

Leaf injury ratings for samples taken in June and August in Burlingame and San Mateo. Values are sample means for 5 trees per treatment. Leaf injury was scored from 1 to 5 based on the following scale: 1 =0% leaf area skeletonized, 2 = 25%, 3 = 50%, 4 = 75%, 5 = 100%.

Leaf injury ratings
TreatmentBurlingameSan Mateo
Year1985198619871988198919851986198719881989
MonthJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAugJuneAug
1) 2% carbaryl 1×2.03.21.42.41.31.61.21.81.41.91.83.31.42.01.21.31.21.41.21.7
2) 1% carbaryl 1×2.02.51.21.61.21.21.21.21.11.22.44.51.52.41.52.11.62.12.02.7
3) 2% carbaryl 2×1.62.21.11.51.01.01.01.21.01.12.43.91.62.31.41.91.42.21.52.4
4) 1 % carbaryl 2×1.52.31.11.61.01.11.21.31.11.12.64.51.52.11.52.31.41.91.92.7
5) CONTROL1.52.41.83.01.71.81.41.71.41.92.23.71.73.21.62.01.82.31.82.9
Foliar* (fluvalinate applied in June)1.31.51.11.21.11.21.31.3
  • * Foliar applications were not a formal treatment in this study. Values are presented to give a relative injury rating comparison with trunk banding. Applications were made in Woodside, California (Approximately 15 miles SW of San Mateo).