Table 1.

Liters of herbicide applied/hectare (ha) in 2012, native flowering plant species richness, and number of trees/ha (< 0.3 m in height) in wire zones of 14 treatment sections on State Game Lands 33 Rights-of-Way Research and Demonstration Area, Centre County, PA, USA in 2016. Dominant (> 50% of area) cover type (forb, grass, or shrub) for wire zone is also presented.

Liters of herbicide applied/ha (2012 treatment cycle)Number of stems of trees/haaNative species richness of compatible flowering plant speciesbIntegrated vegetation management herbicide (H) versus mechanical (M) treatmentHerbicide application (selective [backpack spray] or nonselective [broadcast spray])Cover type
014827M (Mowing)N/AShrub
027189M (Mowing)N/AForb
011,61311M (Hand cutting)N/AShrub
0345925M (Hand cutting)N/AShrub
0.754948H (Glyphosate, Imazapyr)cSelectiveGrass
0.757418H (Glyphosate, Imazapyr)SelectiveForb
0.754946H (Glyphosate, Imazapyr)SelectiveForb
6.272477H (Aminopyralid, Imazapyr, Triclopyr)dSelectiveForb
29.93172915H (Aminopyralid, Imazapyr, Triclopyr)BroadcastForb
31.9974110H (Aminopyralid, Imazapyr, Triclopyr)BroadcastShrub
168.37019H (Aminopyralid, Imazapyr)eBroadcastForb
241.3349410H (Aminopyralid, Imazapyr)SelectiveShrub
436.822005H (Aminopyralid, Glyphosate, Imazapyr, Picloram, Triclopyr)fBroadcastGrass
436.821007H (Aminopyralid, Glyphosate, Imazapyr, Picloram, Triclopyr)BroadcastForb
  • aMechanical treatments versus herbicide treatments differed significantly (t = 3.10, df = 1, p = 0.009); mechanical treatments versus glyphosate herbicide treatments differed slightly (t = 2.18, df = 1, p = 0.06); mechanical treatments versus non-glyphosate herbicide treatments differed slightly (t = 2.03, df =1, p = 0.08); glyphosate versus non-glyphosate herbicide treatments did not differ (t = −0.74, df =1, p = 0.481).

  • bMechanical treatments versus herbicide treatments did not differ (t = 1.06, df = 1, p = 0.31); mechanical treatments versus glyphosate herbicide treatments differed slightly (t = 1.81, df = 1, p = 0.09); mechanical treatments versus non-glyphosate treatments did not differ (t = 0.19, df = 1, p = 0.86); glyphosate versus non-glyphosate herbicide treatments differed significantly (t = −2.44, df = 1, p = 0.04).

  • cAccord concentrate (glyphosate) 7% + Arsenal (imazapyr) 1%

  • dGarlon 3A (triclopyr) 5 pints/100 gal (2 L/380 L) + Milestone (aminopyralid) 7 oz/100 gal (210 mL/380 L) + Arsenal (imazapyr) 1%

  • eMilestone (aminopyralid) 5 oz/100 gal (150 mL/380 L) + Arsenal (imazapyr) 4 oz/100 gal (120 mL/380 L)

  • fMilestone (aminopyralid) 7 oz/100 gal (210 mL/380 L) + Rodeo (glyphosate) 1% + Arsenal (imazapyr) 1% + Tordon K (picloram) 4% + Garlon 3A (triclopyr) 5 pints/100 gal (2 L/380 L)