Table 3

Relative utility of selected methods for promoting the use of tree preservation in construction projects (mean scores, 5-point scale) by survey and group.

MethodSurveyGroupTotal n = 647
PA
n = 275
NADF
n = 372
F valueArborist
n = 268
Builder
n = 75
Designer
n = 204
F value
Education4.664.721.424.75 a4.65 a4.66 a1.494.69
Technical help4.374.472.404.57 a4.20 b4.38 b7.804.43
Local ordinances3.71*4.16*20.874.08 a2.89 b4.16 a34.463.97
Govt. incentives3.783.942.433.94 a3.67 a3.83 a1.503.87
State laws3.363.491.353.57 a2.49 b3.55 a19.643.44
  • Between surveys, an asterisk indicates means are significantly different at p < .05; d.f. = 1, 645.

    Among groups, means within a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p < .05; d.f, 2, 544.