Table 3.

Aiternaria blight disease severity in lilacs over a 4-year period in middle Tennessee.

Syringa spp.CultivarMean disease severity (0–5 scale)zOverall disease reactiony
19961997199820022- to 4-year mean
S. meyeriPalibin0.3 k1.2 i-k0.0 m1.0 j-k0.6R
S. meyeriDwarf Korean0.7 j-k0.8 j-k0.0 m1.7 h-k0.8R
S. vulgarisMme. Antoine Buchner1.0 i-k1.2 i-k0.6 j-m1.3 i-k1.0R
S. vulgarisSilver King1.7 h-j1.2 i-k1.0 h-m1.0 j-k1.2MR
S. reticulataIvory Silk2.0 g-i1.6 f-j0.6 j-m1.0 j-k1.3MR
S. reticulataSummer Snow1.7 h-j1.7 e-j————1.7MR
S. hyacinthifloraPocahontas2.0 g-i1.8 e-j1.8 d-j2.0 g-j1.9MR
S. vulgarisLeon Gambetta——1.7 e-j——2.3 f-i2.0MR
S. vulgarisHenry Robert2.3 c-f1.5 f-j————1.9MR
S. vulgarisSensation2.5 b-f1.2 h-k————1.9MR
S. microphyllaSuperba——0.0 k2.0 c-i2.7 e-h1.6MS
S. vulgarisMichael Buchner2.7 e-h1.8 j-k1.0 h-m2.3 f-i1.9MS
S. vulgarisFirmament2.7 e-h2.0 d-j0.2 l-m2.7 e-h1.9MS
S. vulgarisPaul Thirion2.7 e-h1.7 e-j1.2 g-m2.0 g-j1.9MS
S. vulgarisCharm2.7 e-h2.7 b-g1.2 g-m——2.0MS
S. hyacinthifloraExcel2.7 e-h1.8 e-j0.4 k-m3.0 d-g2.0MS
S. vulgarisYankee Doodle2.7 a-b1.8 e-j1.2 g-m2.7 e-h2.1MS
S. josiflexaRoyalty2.9 d-g2.6 c-h1.2 g-m2.0 g-j2.2MS
S. vulgarisLudwig Spaeth2.7 a-b2.0 d-j————2.3S
S. hyacinthifloraSister Justena2.9 d-g1.7 e-j————2.3S
S. vulgarisRuhm Von Horstenstein2.3 f-h1.2 h-k2.8 a-e2.7 e-h2.3S
S. vulgarisMacrostachys3.0 d-g2.7 b-g2.2 b-h1.7 h-k2.4S
S. vulgarisBelle de Nancy3.7 b-e2.2 c-i0.8 i-m2.7 e-h2.3S
S. vulgarisAlbert F. Holden4.3 a-c1.8 e-j0.8 i-m3.0 d-g2.3S
S. prestoniaeDonald Wyman3.3 c-f2.2 c-i1.4 f-l——2.3S
S. vulgarisMiss Ellen Wilmott3.0 d-g1.8 e-j1.2 g-m3.3 c-f2.3S
S. chinensisRothomagensis3.0 d-g3.2 a-d0.0 m3.7 b-e2.5S
S. vulgarisAlphonse Lavallée3.7 b-e1.8 e-j2.6 a-f3.3 c-f2.6S
S. vulgarisKrasavitska Moskvy2.7 e-h1.8 e-j3.2 a-c3.0 d-g2.7S
S. vulgarisEdmund Boisier4.0 a-d2.0 d-j1.2 g-m3.3 c-f2.6S
S. vulgarisPresident Grevy2.7 e-h2.4 c-i1.6 e-k4.0 a-d2.7S
S. vulgarisAdelaide Dunbar4.0 a-d2.2 c-i1.4 f-l3.3 c-f2.8S
S. vulgarisCharles Joly4.3 a-c3.2 a-d1.2 g-m2.7 e-h2.9S
S. vulgarisPresident Poincare3.7 a-b2.8 b-f2.6 a-f2.3 f-i2.9S
S. prestoniaeMinuet4.7 a-b1.2 i-k3.0 a-d——3.0S
S. vulgarisMontaigne4.3 a-c2.2 c-i1.8 d-j3.7 b-e3.0S
S. vulgarisVictor Lemoine3.0 d-g3.0 a-e————3.0S
S. vulgarisMme. F Morel3.7 b-e1.6 f-j2.2 b-h4.3 a-c3.0S
S. vulgarisCharles Tenth4.7 a-b1.6 f-j2.2 b-h3.3 c-f3.0S
S. vulgarisMrs. W.E. Marshall4.3 a-c1.7 e-j——3.3 c-f3.1S
S. vulgarisA.M. Brand4.7 a-b2.0 d-ij3.4 a-b2.3 f-i3.1S
S. vulgarisMonge4.7 a-b2.6 c-h1.8 d-j3.3 c-f3.1S
S. vulgarisVestale4.7 a-b3.4 a-c2.4 b2.3 f-i3.2S
S. vulgarisEdith Cavell5.0 a3.00 a-e2.6 a-f2.3 f-i3.2S
S. henryiWhite Summers4.3 a-c2.2 c-i3.4 a-b3.7 b-e3.4S
S. prestoniaeIsabella4.7 a-b3.0 a-e2.1 c-i4.0 a-d3.4S
S. josiflexaAnna Amhof3.0 d-g2.4 c-i3.0 a-d5.0 a3.4S
S. patulaMiss Kim4.3 a-c2.6 c-h3.2 a-c3.7 b-e3.5S
S. vulgarisAvalanche5.0 a2.2 c-i2.6 a-f4.0 a-d3.5S
S. vulgarisArch McKean5.0 a1.5 f-j3.2 a-c4.7 a-b3.6S
S. vulgarisPresident Lincoln5.0 a2.6 c-h————3.8S
S. vulgarisKatherine Havemeyer5.0 a2.6 c-h3.4 a-b4.0 a-d3.8S
S. prestoniaeJames McFarlane5.0 a3.2 a-d3.4 a-b——3.9S
S. vulgarisMrs. Harry Bickle4.7 a-b3.0 a-e——4.7 a-b4.1S
S. vulgarisMarie Finon5.0 a4.0 a-b————4.5S
S. vulgarisMarie Legraye5.0 a4.2 a————4.6S
LSD1.21.30.91.3
  • z Disease readings of 0 = no symptoms, 1 = 10%, 2 = 11% to 25%, 3 = 26% to 50%, 4 = 51% to 75%, and 5 = 76% to 100% of the foliage showing disease symptoms.

  • y Disease reactions categorized as resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), moderately susceptible (MS), or susceptible (S) were based on the mean disease readings obtained during the growing season in which R = 0 to 1.0, MR = 1.1 to 2.0, MS = 2.1 to 2.9, and S = 3.0 to 5.0. Disease readings greater than 2.0 during any growing season disqualified a cultivar from being considered resistant even if the 4-year mean disease reading was less than 2.0; any disease reading of 2.5 to 3.0 during any growing season was an indication of moderate susceptibility, and any reading of greater than 3.0 during a growing season was regarded as fully susceptible.