Table 2.

Efficacy of foliar insecticides applied at label rate for scale insects (see text) against settled calico scale crawlers on leaves of individually sprayed shoots.

Trial and treatmentCrawlers per shootzPercent mortalityyAdjusted percent mortalityx
Trial 1, treated 23 June 2001, on sugar maple
Control544 ± 12627.7 ± 4.50.0 ± 0.0
Insecticidal soap482 ± 8750.0 ±7.8*32.6 ± 7.5
Horticultural oil515 ±8054.5 ± 7.9*37.7 ± 9.7
Bifenthrin478 ± 9996.8 ± 1.9*94.4 ± 2.8
Acephate638 ±161100.0 ± 0.0*100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 2, treated 22 July 2002, on hackberry
Control1375 ±19210.2 ± 2.50.0 ± 0.0
Insecticidal soap1230 ±1517.7 ± 1.80.7 ± 0.7
Pyriproxyfen1388 ±3038.7 ± 1.62.8 ± 0.4
Horticultural oil1930 ± 84354.5 ± 13.4*50.2 ± 14.0
Bifenthrin1139 ±20890.2 ± 3.2*89.0 ± 3.7
Acephate1328 ±36199.2 ± 0.3*99.1 ± 0.3
Carbaryl855 ±132100.0 ±0.0*100.0 ±0.0
Trial 3, treated 23 June 2003, on hackberry
Control1609 ± 2304.8 ± 1.20.0 ± 0.0
Pyriproxyfen982 ± 13588.6 ± 3.9*87.8 ± 4.3
Cyfluthrin1291 ±36899.4 ± 0.4*99.4 ± 0.4
  • z Mean total crawlers does not differ significantly among treatments in any trial (two-way ANOVA, P > 0.32).

  • y ANOVA results: trial 1: F = 79.3; df = 4,35; P < 0.001; trial 2: F = 91.4; df = 6,40; P < 0.001; trial 3: F = 385.3; df = 2,14; P < 0.0001.

  • x Abbott’s (1925) formula used to adjust for mortality in untreated controls.

  • Data are means (± standard error); efficacy was evaluated 18, 13, and 38 days after treatment in trials 1–3, respectively. Within trials and columns, means followed by an asterisk (*) differ significantly from the untreated control (Dunnett’s test, α = 0.05).