Table 2.

A comparison of advantages and disadvantages of three utility arboreta models.

Type of utility line arboretumAdvantagesDisadvantages
City street with existing overhead lines
  • No pole and line installation required.

  • High visibility for public, commercial, and municipal education.

  • Cooperation with numerous city entities may be necessary.

  • Trees serve multiple functions (aesthetics, cooling, erosion control, noise abatement, glare reduction, stormwater retention, etc.).

  • Tree and maintenance costs may be a city responsibility.

  • No control over line location.

  • Space may be more restrictive relative to species selection.

  • Cooperation with numerous city entities may be necessary.

  • Public may be displeased with removal of hazard trees.

  • May lose control of tree pruning to the utility company.

  • Volunteer activities may be more constrained or regulated.

Demonstration site with existing overhead lines
  • No pole or line installation required.

  • More flexibility regarding additional uses of site.

  • Species selection may be more flexible.

  • May lose control of tree pruning to the utility company.

  • No control over line location.

  • Generally all tree purchase, installation, and maintenance costs are the site’s responsibility.

  • Visibility for public, commercial, and municipal education may be limited.

Demonstration site without existing overhead lines
  • Control over line location, site development, and tree pruning.

  • Lines installed are not energized.

  • More flexibility regarding additional uses of site.

  • Greatest flexibility relative to species.

  • Total control over tree pruning.

  • Requires pole and line installation.

  • Generally all tree purchase, installation, and maintenance costs are the site’s responsibility.

  • Visibility for public, commercial, and municipal education may be limited.