Table 3.

Results for cut-tree treatments in 2001 tree-of-heaven trialz.

Means for sproutsv
Vigor mean over all treesy,xPercent of trees with sproutswVigorNumberHeight (m)
2002200320022003200220032002200320022003
CutGlyphosate2.5 b4.1 b33.5 b40.8 b7.59.93.92.91.02.5
    stumpImazapyr0.0 c0.6 c  3.1 c  9.8 c0.56.30.02.80.7
Triclopyr1.0 bc0.5 c21.0 bc  6.7 c4.37.51.81.50.40.6
Cut control8.3 a7.4 a85.7 a85.7 a9.78.77.36.01.12.4
StumpGlyphosate6.7 a6.6 ab85.7 a92.9 a8.07.15.54.20.81.7
    injectionImazapyr0.9 b1.5 c35.8 c32.1 c2.14.06.16.30.20.7
Triclopyr4.8 a5.0 b60.7 b62.5 b7.97.73.32.40.41.2
Cut control8.3 a7.4 a85.7 ab85.7 ab9.78.77.36.01.12.4
  • zAll evaluations made in August 2002 and 2003. Values are means over all application timings. Within each treatment group, values followed by the same letter are not different at α = 0.05. Cut control values were used for separate comparisons with cut stump and stump injection treatments.

  • yVigor is a visual evaluation scale where 0 = dead, 10 = healthy.

  • xDifferences determined by analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls test.

  • wDifferences determined by logistic regression.

  • vOnly for trees with resprouting.