Table 2.

Urban forest canopy cover comparison for Syracuse, New York.z

MethodImageryYearPercent canopy coverStandard error or accuracySourcey
Photograph interpretationPhotographic prints198424%A
Emerge 2 ft (60 cm) (digital)199925.7%SE: 2.5%F
NYS Orthos 1 ft (30 cm) (digital)200324.7%SE: 2.5%F
Supervised classificationEmerge 2 ft (60 cm)199926.6%Acc: 82%D
Subpixel–Cubist (specific)Landsat 30 mca. 200126.6%MAE: 11.7%F
NLCD subpixel (regional)Landsat 30 mca. 200112.7%E
USFS Forest DensityAVHRR 1.1 km199121.6%B
USFS RPA (water removed)AVHRR 1.1 km199123.0%C
UFORE ground sample199924.4%SE: 1.97%F
200123.1%SE: 1.82%F
200421.4%SE: 1.79%F
  • zResults in shaded rows were generated using digital classification techniques.

  • yA = Rowntree (1984); B = Zhu (1994); C = Dwyer et al. (2000); D = Myeong et al. (2001); E = USGS National Land Cover Database (2001); Homer et al. (2007); F = USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Syracuse, NY, unpublished data.

  • NLCD = National Land Cover Database; USFS RPA = U.S. Forest Service’s Resources Planning Act; UFORE = Urban Forest Effects; AVHRR = Advanced Very-High Resolution Radiometer; MAE = mean absolute error; SE = standard error.