Table 4.

Frequencies in the contingency analysis between species-specific tree growth patterns and studied urban zones.

SpeciesGrowth rateUrban zonesz
12345
Norway mapleSlow69%14%11%5%1%
Fair14%34%12%25%15%
Fast1%19%12%41%27%
HackberrySlow30%50%2%9%9%
Fair8%35%0%35%22%
Fast8%37%0%12%43%
Fastest0%3%0%16%81%
Green ashSlow20%80%0%0%0%
Fair23%55%3%2%17%
Fast3%56%0%0%41%
Fastest1%28%0%15%56%
HoneylocustSlow23%68%-2%7%
Fair6%80%-8%6%
Fast9%74%-3%14%
Fastest2%33%-11%54%
Littleleaf lindenSlow--72%3%25%
Fair--52%3%45%
Fast--4%17%79%
Siberian elmSlow-93%7%--
Fair-53%47%--
Fast-39%61%--
Fastest-39%61%--
All species matrixSlow26%56%8%2%8%
Fair13%53%17%9%8%
Fast4%23%18%13%42%
Fastest2%28%6%11%53%
  • z Urban zones: 1) Commercial intensive, 2) Commercial, 3) Institutional, 4) Residential intensive, 5) Residential.