Table 3.

Soil pH and nutrient concentrations beneath red maple (Acer rubrum) trees at four urban sites in the eastern United States in spring 2007. Within a site and column, means following by different letters are significantly different (SAS PROC GLIMMIX, Fisher’s LSD P < 0.05). For treatment descriptions, see Materials and Methods.

SiteTreatmentpHNO3
(ppm)
P
(kg/ha)
K
(kg/ha)
Ca
(t/ha)
Mg
(kg/ha)
Zn
(kg/ha)
Mn
(kg/ha)
Cu
(kg/ha)
B
(kg/ha)
AndersonC6.1bc1.3a7.3b182.2c1.2b132.8c2.6b45.7a2.4b0.7b
AFM6.7a1.2a22.4a306.4a1.9ab355.5a6.8a60.0a4.9a1.3ab
A6.2bc0.7a6.9b212.1bc1.3b141.5bc2.5b45.7a2.9ab0.6b
F6.0c1.0a9.2b204.1b1.2b171.6bc2.6b54.7a2.7b0.6b
M6.5ab1.2a5.0b233.3bc2.2a180.0b4.0b56.2a2.0b1.6a
BostonC5.7b2.8ab96.7b126.4b2.0cd206.5c10.0bc44.6b6.3a0.6b
AFM6.6a3.3ab268.0a167.1a5.6a364.7a25.6a66.1a3.2b1.0a
A5.8b4.2a100.7b121.7b1.9d188.6c7.8c36.8b6.2a0.4c
F6.0b4.1a118.7b124.1b2.4bc215.3bc10.9bc44.9b6.3a0.6b
M5.8b1.9b94.0b115.2b2.5b239.6b12.7b57.1a3.8b0.6b
Myrtle BeachC7.2ab1.9a61.8ab83.2a5.2a101.8b3.6b15.8b0.7b0.6a
AFM6.4b0.9a53.2ab103.4a6.8a205.0a5.3b31.8a0.8ab0.7a
A7.3ab1.6a48.0b84.7a6.6a134.0ab4.8b17.8b0.8ab0.6a
F6.2ab1.2a75.4a102.9a6.0a132.7ab9.0a40.3a1.6a0.7a
M7.6a1.3a71.9ab113.9a6.3a150.5ab5.9b17.4b1.0ab0.8a
PittsburghC6.1b4.8a97.6b350.8ab4.3a409.7a11.9a77.4bc1.8b1.2bc
AFM5.9b2.0c134.8a383.9ab5.2a406.3a11.9a111.2b2.0b1.7ab
A6.3b3.9ab117.9ab320.5b4.4a467.2a7.7b67.8c1.8b1.1c
F4.8c2.0c88.7b243.9c4.8a281.1b10.5ab168.9a6.2a0.6d
M6.8a2.7bc107.5ab400.0a5.7a502.2a8.0b80.9bc1.2b1.8a