Table 3.

Alabama officials (mayor, council member, administrator) perceptions of benefits and problems of urban trees.

MayorCouncil memberAdministrator
N = 204N = 359N = 220
Benefits
Increase in property valuesz45%45%35%
Decrease in energy costs25%24%19%
Improvement in air quality31%29%33%
Reduction of noise levels18%13%11%
Decrease in soil erosionz23%34%25%
Improvement in water qualityz26%24%32%
Creation of wildlife habitat28%34%35%
Increase in community pride46%40%41%
Reduction in storm water runoff15%17%20%
Increase in recreational opportunities39%41%40%
Improvement in health and well-beingz9%4%3%
Positive impact on consumer behavior15%16%11%
Creation of buffer zonesz9%6%3%
Problems and Costs
Planting costsz44%27%22%
Pruning costsz22%21%13%
Irrigation costsz61%66%58%
Recycling pruned tree limbz24%29%32%
Removing hazardous trees31%30%28%
Insect and disease controlz57%47%55%
Root damage to sidewalks, curbs, and utility lines7%9%8%
Medical costs associated with allergies7%10%7%
Administering a local urban tree programz14%25%30%
Damage to property or personal safety29%35%37%
  • zA significant difference exists between at least two groups of the mayor, council member, and administrator.