Table 7.

Mean stem dry weight, root dry weight, root volume, and root:shoot ratio are indicated for each soil treatment, each maple cultivar, and each year.

Biomass measure
Stem dry wt (g)Root dry wt (g)Root volume (cm3)Root:shoot (ratio)
Soil treatmentz
MODERATE-density (n = 14)23.7 ± 2.4 a45.7 ± 6.4 a100.1 ± 15.2 a1.3 ± 0.13 b
HIGH-density (n = 28)15.2 ± 1.2 b36.7 ± 3.8 a78.6 ± 9.6 a1.5 ± 0.11 a
Speciesy
‘Armstrong’ Freeman maple (n = 21)15.3 ± 1.9 b32.7 ± 4.5 a64.5 ± 10.1 b1.3 ± 0.10 b
‘Brandywine’ red maple (n = 21)20.8 ± 1.4 a46.7 ± 4.5 a107.0 ± 11.2 a1.5 ± 0.14 a
Yearx
2002 (n = 12)13.6 ± 1.9 b18.4 ± 2.6 b67.9 ± 12.8 b0.72 ± 0.04 c
2003 (n = 18)19.0 ± 2.2 a43.5 ± 5.0 a108.3 ± 15.4 a1.49 ± 0.07 b
2004 (n = 12)20.9 ± 1.9 a55.3 ± 3.9 a142.7 ± 10.6 a1.98 ± 0.11 a
  • zMODERATE = mean bulk density of 1.64 g·cm−3 (n = 24), HIGH = mean bulk density for the three-year study of 1.77 g·cm−3 (n = 48).

  • ySpecies Acer × freemanii ‘Armstrong’, Armstrong Freeman maple, and Acer rubrum ‘Brandywine’, Brandywine red maple; means ± mean standard error followed by different letters indicate a significant difference between soil treatments, species, or year at P ≤ 0.05.

  • xYear study period was 2002, 2003, and 2004.