Table 6.

Mean annual height growth, leaf area, and dry weight measurements for interactions between year by species and for species by soil treatment.

Biomass measure
Height growth (cm·y−1)Leaf area (cm2)Leaf dw (g)
Year by specieszy
2002 (n = 21)
    ‘Armstrong’27.0 ± 3.8 a (a)1167.4 ± 85.2 b (a)9.2 ± 0.6 b (a)
    ‘Brandywine’30.1 ± 4.2 a [a]2150.9 ± 137.1 a [a]13.5 ± 0.9 a [a]
2003 (n = 15)
    ‘Armstrong’27.3 ± 4.4 a (a)1429.2 ± 231.4 a (a)10.3 ± 1.5 a (a)
    ‘Brandywine’11.6 ± 2.5 b [b]1411.1 ± 105.9 a [b]9.0 ± 0.7 a [b]
2004 (n = 6)
    ‘Armstrong’27.8 ± 5.7 a (a)1041.1 ± 88.3 a (a)8.0 ± 0.6 a (a)
    ‘Brandywine’6.1 ± 4.2 b [b]860.3 ± 50.6 a [c]6.5 ± 0.4 a [c]
Species by soil treatmentx
    ‘Armstrong’
    MODERATE-density (n = 14)40.1 ± 4.3 a (a)1577.0 ± 241.0 a (a)11.8 ± 1.5 a (a)
    HIGH-density (n = 28)20.8 ± 2.4 b [a]1075.8 ± 61.9 b [b]8.2 ± 0.4 b [b]
    ‘Brandywine’
    MODERATE-density (n = 14)21.8 ± 4.7 a (b)1972.0 ± 224.2 a (a)12.3 ± 1.5 a (a)
    HIGH-density (n = 28)19.2 ± 3.5 a [a]1567.5 ± 113.1 a [a]10.2 ± 0.6 a [a]
  • zYear study period was 2002, 2003, and 2004.

  • ySpecies were Acer × freemanii ‘Armstrong’, Armstrong Freeman maple, and Acer rubrum ‘Brandywine’, Brandywine red maple; means ± mean standard error followed by different letters indicate a significant difference between treatments, at P ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, HSD); values in parentheses indicate differences within a single species but between year or soil treatment, and means in brackets indicate differences within either a single year and between species, or a single species between soil treatments.

  • xMODERATE = mean bulk density of 1.64 g·cm−3 (n = 24), HIGH = mean bulk density of 1.77 g·cm−3 (n = 48) averaged across the three-year study.