Table 5.

Problems with trees in cities, ranked by level of agreement with each statement, for urban residents who strongly agree that trees are important to their quality of life compared to those who do not strongly agree.

Problems with treesStrongly agree that trees are important to quality of life (n = 1,667)Don’t strongly agree that trees are important to to quality of life (n = 336)
RankzLevel of agreementyRankzLevel of agreementy
Trees are a problem in cities because they cause allergies11.58 ± 0.0411.91 ± 0.09
Trees should not be used in business districts because they block store signs21.52 ± 0.0421.83 ± 0.08
Trees should not be planted because their roots crack sidewalks31.44 ± 0.0431.75 ± 0.09
Trees should be removed from cities because they can fall across power lines41.39 ± 0.0441.69 ± 0.08
Trees should not be used in cities because they make it difficult to detect criminal behavior51.38 ± 0.0351.67 ± 0.08
Trees should not be planted along streets because they drip sap or sticky residue on parked cars61.37 ± 0.0361.65 ± 0.09
Trees should not be planted in cities because they are ugly when they are not maintained71.27 ± 0.0381.57 ± 0.08
Trees should not be planted in cities because they cost the city too much81.24 ± 0.0371.60 ± 0.08
  • zRanking based on the order of the means.

  • yMean ± margin of error, based on a 95% confidence interval. Means are based on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).