Table 5.

Effect of retention time in three container sizes on elm, maple, and magnolia root architecture in 170 L containers.

Retention time (months) in containersPercent five largest roots circling at position of 11 or 57 L containerzPercent five largest roots descending at position of 11 or 57 L containeryPercent five largest roots straight at position of 11 or 57 L containerx
11 L57 L170 L
Elm
482012 awBv84 A4 cB
7101512 aB76 A12 aB
912118 bB84 A8 bB
121464 cB88 A8 bB
Maple
48202044 c36 a
710152040 c40 a
9121116 B84 aA0 cB
121462060 b20 b
Magnolia
48208 bB80 aA12 aB
7101520 aB68 bA12 aB
9121124 aB68 bA8 bB
121468 bB84 aA8 bB
  • z Percent of the five largest roots measured on cut root ball disc 12 cm below root ball top surface that circled at <45 degree angle relative to horizontal at either the 11 or 57 L container position.

  • y Percent of the five largest roots measured on cut root ball disc 12 cm below root ball top surface that descended relative to horizontal at >45 degree angle at either the 11 or 57 L container position.

  • x Percent of the five largest roots on cut root ball disc 12 cm below root ball top surface that grew without branching or deflecting at the 11 or 57 L container position, or if they branched the largest segment grew to the edge of the 170 L container without deflecting >45 degrees left or right.

  • w Means in a column within species with a different lower case letter are statistically different at P < 0.05; n = 5.

  • v Means in a row within species with a different upper case letter are statistically different at P < 0.05; n = 5 using one way ANOVA for each retention time independently.