Table 7.

Management & Institutions (M). Second-, third-, and fourth-tier variables relating to (M), one of the five core first-tier factors in the UFSES framework. Abbreviations in the “Other UF frameworks” column correspond to shorthand citation keys for frameworks described in Table 2. Notes for Table 3 through Table 9 appear in Appendix D. UFSES (urban forest social-ecological system); UF (urban forest); NLCD (National Land Cover Database).

NumberSecond-tier variableThird-a and fourth-tierb variable(s)Description and possible valuesOther UF frameworks
M1Operational level maintenance activitiesSpecifics of on-the-ground maintenance activities, including tree care activities as well as planting and site preparation.SUS, MAIN, MOS, VULN, NBS, PAT
M1-1Type of maintenanceaPlanting (including site preparation), pruning, watering, mulching, staking, soil and nutrient management (aeration, fertilizing), tree removal, pest treatment(s), other cultural management practices, etc.MAIN, SES1
M1-2Party performing the maintenanceaMunicipal crews (forestry staff, generalist public works staff), public utility (electric, gas) company, contracted arborists/landscapers, local nonprofit staff, homeowners, volunteers (including who manages the volunteers), etc.MAIN, SES1
M1-3IntensityaHow much maintenance is performed, (e.g., how much of the crown is pruned, how much water is given).MAIN
M1-4FrequencyaHow often maintenance is performed (e.g., on a 4- or 6-year pruning cycle, watering once per week).MAIN
M1-5DurationaFor how long maintenance is performed (e.g., for just the first growing season, throughout a tree’s life).MAIN
M1-6ExtentaWhat part of a tree, or which trees, are maintained (e.g., removing branches below a desired clearance height or removing no more than X% of total canopy, maintaining only trees on heavily trafficked streets).MAIN
M1-7Seasonal timingaWhen during the year (e.g., year-round, leaf-on, April–November).
M1-8Maintenance costsaMonetary costs of operational-level maintenance activities; may also include the monetary value of unpaid volunteers who perform tree maintenance; different from total municipal tree budget (H9-3).MAIN, BEY, GOV2
M2Data/record keeping practicesWhat kind of data is collected; when and how data is collected; in what form and/or for what reason/purposes data is used; how regularly is it updated; etc. (e.g., 100% public tree inventory kept up-to-date with planting and removal activities, prunings, and other tree maintenance entered into record-keeping system when performed).NBS
M2-1Street tree inventory practicesaOn-the-ground, virtual (street-level imagery), windshield, or other.SUS
M2-1aMethod of data collectionbOn-the-ground inventory with smartphones, paper records, Lidar-based individual tree inventory, etc.
M2-1bFrequency of updatingbSporadically/as needed, at regular intervals, as work is performed, etc.
M2-1cSpecific variables gathered during inventorybList of variables included in inventory, such as species, location information, condition/maintenance needs, etc.
M2-2Canopy cover dataaWhat kind of spatial data is the canopy cover data generated from? Lidar/high-resolution images, NLCD data, photo interpretation, digitized aerial photos, etc.SUS
M2-2aResolution of canopy datab30-m resolution, 3-m resolution, point sampling, etc.
M2-2bFrequency of updatingbSporadically/as needed, at regular intervals, etc.
M2-3Tree care recordsaTree care work: most salient for public trees, trees in parks or along the public right-of-way (or, for institutional urban forests, semipublic trees on institutional properties, e.g., college campuses).
M2-3aPlanting records/locationsbHow/are records of tree planting locations kept, how often is planting data updated, etc.
M2-3bPruning records/locationsbHow/are records of tree pruning/trimming activities kept/updated, etc.
M2-3cRemoval records/locationsbHow/are records of tree removals kept/updated.
M2-3xOther maintenance records/locationsbInspections, pest treatments, etc.
M2-4Transparency of dataaData availability and transparency to other interested parties, the general public.
M2-5Data/record keeping costsaDirect, monetary costs of data/record keeping.
M2-XOther data/record keeping practicesaPrivate property tree data, etc.
M3Proactive management activitiesUrban tree and forest management activities separate from operational level maintenance activities (M1)(Note 21).GOV1, VULN, MOS, GOV2, NBS
M3-1Urban forestry strategic or master planning effortsaMore holistic than day-to-day management planning or operations level plans; may involve strategic assessments of planting opportunities, greenspace or greenway plans, etc.; master planning efforts may involve some or all of M3-2 through M3-9.SUS, MOS
M3-2Tree preservation planningaPlans, policies, or procedures, including permitting, to protect trees during construction or redevelopment efforts, including municipal capital improvements; protecting existing mature trees and tree canopy is crucial to ensuring the continued benefits these existing trees provide.SUS
M3-2aTree preservation planning (during new construction/development)bPractices to manage/protect trees (on both private property and public right-of-way) during the construction of completely new buildings on previously non-built-up lands (e.g., remnant woodlands or other semitreed habitat, treed vacant lots, farmlands with tree breaks).
M3-2bTree preservation planning (during redevelopment/renovations)bPractices to manage/protect trees (on both private property and public right-of-way) on existing built-up lands during construction that could include razing existing structures, digging new foundations, creating additions, or otherwise altering a property on an existing urban lot.MORT
M3-2cTree preservation planning (during municipal capital improvements)bThe extent to which municipal improvement projects in the public right-of-way (e.g., water/sewer, road, sidewalk repairs or upgrades) preserve or fail to preserve mature trees in the right-of-way; indicates how the city values green infrastructure as an asset class relative to the improvement of grey infrastructures like roads and sewer lines.
M3-3Climate change planningaPlans, policies, or procedures to consider or alter urban forest maintenance and management practices in response to the changes in precipitation, temperatures, storm frequency and intensity, and other local- to regional-level impacts resulting from global climate changes.CC
M3-4Risk assessment proceduresaPlans, policies, or procedures to assess tree risk or hazard potential, either after a physical disturbance, such as a storm or fire, or in response to resident requests (and follow-through on these plans).SUS, MORT, BEY
M3-5Pest/disease management planningaPlans, policies, or procedures for how to proceed in managing major tree pests or disease infestations (e.g., emerald ash borer [Agrilus planipennis]).
M3-6Natural areas planningaPlans, policies, or procedures for how to manage natural areas, nature preserves, or larger tracts of more “intact” urban forest/woodlands, including plans for the connectivity of natural areas or greenways.SUS
M3-7Equity considerations in planningaConsiderations made for the equitable distribution of trees/urban forest resources and of maintenance/management efforts based on race/ethnicity, income, or other socio-demographic dimensions, as well as based on existing trees/canopy.MOS
M3-8Knowledge transfer activitiesaPublic education efforts of stakeholder groups such as municipal governments, nonprofits, universities, and others; includes fact sheets, workshops, advertising/social media campaigns, etc.GOV1, GOV2
M3-9Evaluation and assessmentaProgram evaluation, quality improvements, assessments, audits by internal or external parties, etc.; response to the results of these evaluations could also be documented.GOV1
M3-9aParticipation in standards programsbParticipation in urban forestry assessment or standards programs, such as the Arbor Day Foundation Tree City/Campus/Line programs and similar (Note 22).
M3-10Proactive management costsaDirect, monetary costs of proactive management (e.g., cost of a consultant-prepared urban forest management plan).
M4Other reactive management activitiesResponse to storms, pests, or other disturbances, resident/311 requests like debris pick-up (Note 23).VULN, MORT
M4-1Costs of reactive managementaDirect, monetary costs of reactive tree maintenance activities (e.g., storm clean-up costs, tree removal costs due to lack of pest management, etc.).BEY
M5Collective-choice level institutionsRules and strategies about operational level maintenance, record keeping, and proactive management activities (e.g., who and how it is decided that tree maintenance is conducted at a particular intensity, frequency, etc.); monitoring and enforcement of operational level maintenance activities (Note 24).GOV1, VULN, MOS, GOV2, PAT
M5-1Enforcement of ordinances and contractsaProcedures (and adequate resources) for enforcing ordinances (e.g., tree preservation ordinances) and contracts with private companies for tree care (e.g., ensuring quality tree planting occurs and evaluating tree survival and pursuing any warranty guarantees per tree condition).NBS
M5-2 through M5-XCollective-choice level: Boundary rules, Position rules, Choice rules, Information rules, Aggregation rules, Payoff rules, Scope rulesaSeven kinds of rules that help specify the kinds of institutions relevant to operational-level tree maintenance decisions; see Figure 3 in Mincey et al. (2013) for a fully specified example with all rule types; some of these kinds of rules may be inside M3. Proactive management activities (Note 25).INST
M5-YOther collective-choice level institutionsaAdditional kinds of rules, norms, strategies about the operational-level management decisions
M6Constitutional-choice level institutionsRules and strategies about who makes collective-choice level rules (e.g., the ordinance, case-law, policy, informal tradition, or other decision-making enabling authority that specifies who and how operational level maintenance decisions are made)(Note 24).GOV1, MOS, GOV2, PAT
M6-1 through M6-XConstitutional-choice level: Boundary rules, Position rules, Choice rules, Information rules, Aggregation rules, Payoff rules, Scope rulesaSeven kinds of rules that help specify the kinds of institutions relevant to collective-choice level decision-making; see Figure 4 in Mincey et al. (2013) for a fully specified example with all rule types (Note 25).INST
M6-YOther constitutional-choice level institutionsaAdditional kinds of rules, norms, strategies about the collective-choice level institutions (e.g., who can make the collective-choice level rules, norms, strategies)
M7Meta-constitutional level institutionsRules and strategies about the manner in which constitutional-choice level decisions are made (e.g., the enabling authority); kind/style of government (e.g., mayor-council at municipal level; “right to work” state; constitutional democracy at national level)(Note 24).GOV1, GOV2, PAT
M8Property rights regimes, Land ownership, access rights, use rightsbOwnership of and/or legal responsibility for tree and/or tree-planting space (Note 26).GOV1, GOV2, PAT
M9/MXLegal institutionsOrdinances, laws, regulations, and judicial precedents/case law regarding the planting, preservation, care, removal, and liability issues related to trees (including procedures for sanctioning violators); might be specified inside M5 and M6 for those legal institutions which specify collective-choice or constitutional-level institutions (Note 27).GOV1, GOV2
M10/HXNorms/behaviorsIndividual and/or shared view/values on trees/yards/lawns and their benefits, costs, risks, level of tree care, invasive species management, aesthetic preferences, etc.; “civic ecology” behaviors on private yards such as lawncare activities, leaf management, vegetable, perennial, or native gardening, etc. (Note 28).SUS, GOV1, MOS, MORT
  • a Third-tier variable(s).

  • b Fourth-tier variable(s).