Table 1.

Codes stemmed from the research questions and study goals and the expected responses of each.

Review questionsPossible responses
What are the definitions of conflicts in urban forest management provided in the paper?Open-ended and coded qualitatively
What are the definitions of collaborations in urban forest management provided in the paper?Open-ended and coded qualitatively
What research methods were used?Qualitative (interviews, focus groups, participant observation, etc.) Quantitative (US Census, survey questionnaire, etc.) Mixed methods Other, explain
What locations were studied?Country, city/community block, etc.
What is the context around the conflicts and/or collaborations studied?Open-ended based on research item and coded qualitatively
What types of theories, if any, were used to study conflict and collaboration?Open-ended based on research item
What stakeholders were involved at what different scales?Open- and close-ended based on research item using the following options:
  • Government agencies

  • Nonprofit or volunteer organizations

  • Extension agents

  • Private consultants/private forestry professionals

  • Non-expert public

  • Stakeholders within agency, between agency, between public/agency

  • Did not specify any stakeholders

What lessons were learned that can enhance the management of urban forests?Open-ended based on research item and coded qualitatively
What are the research gaps/opportunities for future research on conflict and collaboration?Open-ended based on research item and coded qualitatively