Table 1:

Mean incremental growth of four shade tree species on the campus of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1987-1991.

Tree speciesMean dbh1 (cm)Trench distance2 (m)TreatmentMean incremental growth (cm)4
19871988198919901991
Hackberry26.20.5T1.120.38a0.96a0.69a0.66a
23.4C30.74b1.72b1.32b1.12b
Sweetgum28.22.6T1.73a0.61a1.45a1.83a1.04a
28.4C1.96a0.91a1.55a1.83a1.34b
Sugar Maple29.50.9T0.58a0.36a0.94a1.09a0.69a
29.0C0.91b0.23a0.94a0.84a0.74a
Honeylocust44.91.8T0.79a0.51a0.83a0.76a0.74a
(Site#l) 47.7C1.04a0.53a0.74a0.76a0.81a
Honeylocust36.63.3T1.12a0.96a0.74a0.96a0.51a
(Site #2) 31.8C1.04a0.69b0.81a0.71b0.69a
  • 1. Mean dbh measurements of all four tree species for trenched and control trees taken prior to the 1987 growing season.

  • 2. Linear distance from the center of the trunk of the affected tree to the center of the trench.

  • 3. No data available due to the replacement of the original control set with a new control set. (Refer to Materials and Methods for details).

  • 4. Paired treatment values for each tree species for each growing season followed by the same letter are not significantly different.(p<0.05; Two-Tailed T-test).