Table 2.

Table of results for comparisons between citizen-scientist data and data collected by expert staff, listed from highest to lowest % agreement. The number of times a presence/absence variable was noted as ‘Present’ by staff and citizen scientists is included to provide additional clarification for % Agreement results, which tend to be higher for those variables present in fewer cases, even in cases where Sn and PPV were low. n = 2872 for all variables except for DBH (n = 2913 due to the inclusion of dead trees) and Species (n = 2702 due to some specimens only being identified to genus level).

Assessment variablePercentage agreementzSn (%)Sp (%)PPV(%)NPV (%)Staff presence (n)Citizen scientist presence (n)
Trunk Problem: Lightsy99.880.099.950.010058
Root Problem: Metal Gratesy99.266.799.323.199.9926
Trunk Problem: Rope/Wiresy96.425.097.310.699.03685
DBH (2.54 cm tolerance)92.7------------
Root Problem: Othery91.929.492.64.699.134219
Branch Problem: Othery91.235.292.38.198.754236
Trunk Problem: Othery89.440.090.16.199.045297
Branch Problem: Lights/Wiresy89.459.490.723.098.0128330
Tree Guards87.8------------
Genus86.5------------
Stewardshipx80.679.980.970.387.710371159
Species77.6------------
Tree Condition74.9------------
Root Problem: Stonesy73.763.076.137.390.1529893
Sidewalk Damage73.358.381.061.379.0931979
DBH (exact)32.0------------
  • z Citizen-scientist percentage agreement with NYC Parks’ staff.

  • y These assessment variables are sub-variables of Tree Problems.

  • x Stewardship was converted to presence/absence for analysis because some signs of stewardship were ephemeral (for example, witnessing a steward watering or weeding a tree), and would likely not be present during both rounds of data collection, though the quantity category data will be used operationally.