Least significance difference (LSD) test results for groups of analyzed urban tree appraisal formulas, appraiser experience, and between appraisers in central Chile.
| Formula | Average ranking | Homogenous groups | Appraiser group | Average ranking | Homogenous groups | Appraiser | Average ranking | Homogenous groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danish method | 537.2 | A | Senior | 1,408.4 | J | Appraiser S2 | 1,340.5 | L |
| French method | 809.1 | B | Junior | 1,472.6 | K | Appraiser S1 | 1,360.1 | L M |
| CTLA | 977.8 | C | Appraiser J1 | 1,419.8 | L M N | |||
| Swiss method | 1,076.3 | C D | Appraiser S3 | 1,429.1 | L M N | |||
| Peñalolén method | 1,095.4 | D | Appraiser J2 | 1,476.2 | M N | |||
| Italian method | 1,298.0 | E | Appraiser J3 | 1,493.3 | N | |||
| COPIMA | 1,382.1 | E | Appraiser J4 | 1,501.1 | N | |||
| Tedesco method | 1,752.2 | F | Appraiser S4 | 1,503.8 | N | |||
| Norma Granada | 1,892.4 | G | ||||||
| Burnley method | 2,086.5 | H | ||||||
| Helliwell method | 2,106.4 | H | ||||||
| STEM | 2,272.6 | I |