PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sellmer, James C.
AU  - Ostiguy, Nancy
AU  - Kelley, Kathleen M.
AU  - Hoover, Kelli
TI  - Assessing the integrated pest management practices of Pennsylvania, U.S., landscape companies
AID  - 10.48044/jauf.2004.030
DP  - 2004 Jul 01
TA  - Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
PG  - 253--260
VI  - 30
IP  - 4
4099  - http://auf.isa-arbor.com/content/30/4/253.short
4100  - http://auf.isa-arbor.com/content/30/4/253.full
SO  - JOA2004 Jul 01; 30
AB  - A mail survey was conducted in 2000 to determine awareness and use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices by landscape companies in Pennsylvania, U.S. Participants answered questions pertaining to awareness of common practices, the frequency at which IPM practices were employed, and aspects of monitoring and pest management decision-making processes. Three distinct IPM practitioner segments were identified and labeled “IPM savvy” (companies more likely to employ IPM practices), “part-time IPMers” (companies that employed some IPM strategies), and “reluctant IPMers” (companies least likely to employ IPM strategies). The “part-time IPMers” and “reluctant IPMers” segments represented a substantial part of the industry (68%). Overall, Pennsylvania landscape companies are aware of IPM practices and monitor for insects and mites, diseases, and weeds. However, confidence in identification of specific pests, site analyses, use of diagnostic and monitoring tools, employing beneficial organisms, and maintaining permanent records of pests and management strategies employed remain low. Continued education is warranted to enhance pest monitoring skills, diagnostic tools, pest identification, treatment options, and record keeping. The results of this survey clearly show that landscape companies still have need of demonstrable evidence that the implementation of IPM practices is cost effective and offers marketing benefits to their company.