RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of Tree Responses to Different Soil Treatments Under Concrete Pavement
JF Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
FD International Society of Arboriculture
SP 303
OP 314
DO 10.48044/jauf.2019.027
VO 45
IS 6
A1 Thomas Smiley, E.
A1 Urban, James
A1 Fite, Kelby
YR 2019
UL http://auf.isa-arbor.com/content/45/6/303.abstract
AB In urban areas there is a limited amount of soil space available for tree root growth. However, many systems have been developed that provide rooting space below pavement while supporting the weight of vehicles and pedestrians. Two main approaches have emerged: 1) supported pavement, and 2) structural growing media. This research was composed of two controlled studies that compare variations of these two approaches. The first was a 10-year study using elm trees that compared gravel-based structural soil (GBSS), expanded slate structural soil (ESSS), expanded slate (ES) alone, a concrete supported pavement and a compacted control. The second study was a four-year study using Liriodendron trees that compared GBSS, sand-based structural soil (SBSS), Silva Cells™, Stratacells™, an open control, and a compacted control. The results of these two studies showed that the trees growing in the supported pavement treatments with low-density soil media resulted in significantly greater tree growth and a healthier appearance. The treatments with the highly compacted soil media had less root development and less top growth. However, soil media that were highly compacted experienced less subsidence.