Abstract
Background The 3-30-300 rule—ensuring 3 trees visible, 30% green cover, and access within 300 m to green spaces—has been proposed as a target to enhance the availability of ecosystem services from urban green spaces and trees. Although existing studies have examined how Western cities do not achieve this rule using aggregate data, which residential building and individuals in high-density East Asian cities benefit from the rule remains unclear.
Methods This study aims to develop a method for evaluating the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level using synthetic population data and to clarify its impact on population groups across different residential building types and urban densities, as well as on groups with different attributes in Himeji City, Japan.
Results The results show that, similar to other cities worldwide, only 5.1% of the population of Himeji City fully meets the 3-30-300 rule, with particular challenges in achieving 30% green cover. Apartments find it harder to meet the overall 3-30-300 rule, while residents in detached houses tend to have 30% green cover. Elderly groups tend to achieve 3 trees visible as well as 30% green cover.
Conclusions The underlying mechanisms differ from those in Western cities and are likely influenced by the decline in privately owned trees, the role of street trees, and urban planning systems in park provision. The results enable a microscale visualization of environmental injustice, facilitating policy prioritization to allocate limited resources aligned with the 3-30-300 rule.
- Environmental Justice
- Residential Building Type
- Synthetic Population Data
- Urban Density
- Urban Green Space
Introduction
Urban areas face numerous challenges across the environmental, societal, and economic domains, including mental health problems, heat islands due to climate change, and insufficient physical activity contributing to lifestyle-related diseases. Urban green spaces and trees provide various ecosystem services, including cooling and improved air quality, recreation, and biodiversity support (Bolund and Hunhammar 1999; Elmqvist et al. 2015; Livesley et al. 2016). These features make them valuable nature-based solutions capable of addressing several societal challenges (Hartig et al. 2014; Fang et al. 2023). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the significance of urban green spaces and trees for well-being was increasingly recognized (Noszczyk et al. 2022). Therefore, green spaces and trees are essential for fostering inclusive, safe, and healthy cities.
Strategies for expanding and locating urban green spaces and trees have been established from the international level down to local governments (Morgenroth et al. 2025). The European Union requires cities to set ambitious greening targets (European Commission 2020). Cities like Barcelona (Spain), Bristol (England), Canberra (Australia), Seattle (United States), and Vancouver (Canada) aim for 30% local canopy cover (Konijnendijk 2023). The Sustainable Development Goal 11.7 calls for ensuring individuals’ access to safe, inclusive, and easily accessible green spaces, whereas the World Health Organization recommends a linear distance of no more than 300 m between residential buildings and urban green spaces (World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2016). Additionally, diverse targets, such as green coverage rates, visible tree counts, and annual tree-planting numbers, have been set. However, considering the nuances and complexity of diverse targets, urban planners and decision-makers need clarity, conciseness, and communicability (Konijnendijk 2023). Furthermore, these targets are categorized into management-focused (using municipalities or regions as units) and individual-focused (using individuals or neighborhood areas as units)(Croeser et al. 2024). Therefore, the 3-30-300 rule was proposed as a simple target based on extensive evidence of various ecosystem services with the achievement of each component (Konijnendijk 2022, 2023). The rule includes the elements of visibility, proximity, and accessibility (Konijnendijk 2023). It entails seeing at least 3 trees from a residential building (Component 3), having a neighborhood with 30% tree canopy cover (Component 30), and accessing green spaces within 300 m of a residential building (Component 300)(Konijnendijk 2022, 2023). Meeting all components correlates with reduced likelihood of being overweight and higher physical activity levels (Helbich et al. 2025); fewer psychiatric visits (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022); and reduced urban flooding (Vesuviano et al. 2025). Proposed in 2021, the rule has since been incorporated into policies in cities such as Zürich (Switzerland) and by organizations such as the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and the Nordic Council of Ministers.
Research into the 3-30-300 rule has two limitations. First, studies have mainly focused on Western cities, with a few cases in Asia. The percentage of cities meeting all the components are as follows: 4.7% in Barcelona, Spain (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022); 18% in Aix-en-Provence, France; 4% in Florence, Italy (Lopez et al. 2025); 1.2% in 7 cities in the United Kingdom (Smith et al. 2026); and 16.4% nationwide in the Netherlands (Helbich et al. 2025). Asia possesses the following percentages: 0.45% in Surakarta, Indonesia (Iqbal et al. 2025); over 30% in Singapore (Croeser et al. 2024); and 3.55% in Xiamen, China (Zheng et al. 2024). As East Asian cities possess different urban planning systems and higher population densities than Western cities (Piorr et al. 2011), the applicability of insights from Western studies remains uncertain. Therefore, clarifying whether quantitative targets, such as the 3-30-300 rule, are realistically achievable in Asian cities is crucial. Second, although buildings or districts are commonly used as aggregating units for the 3-30-300 rule, few studies have employed individuals of varying ages and sex as units. Typically, diverse evidence sources are used for the measurement and analysis of the 3-30-300 rule, including vegetation indices, street-level analyses, tree inventories, questionnaires, window-view analyses, land cover maps, and urban green space property maps (Browning et al. 2024). Several studies have calculated scores per building or district using land cover maps for Component 30 and urban green space property maps for Component 300 (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022; Browning et al. 2024; Owen et al. 2024; Helbich et al. 2025). Additionally, for Component 3, the scores for buildings and districts are calculated using tree inventories as advanced initiatives in some European and American cities (Croeser et al. 2024; Helbich et al. 2025) and tree estimates based on widely available extensive digital surface models (Lopez et al. 2025). Conversely, studies using interviews and questionnaires have examined the relationships with other indicators, such as citizen attributes and health status, at the individual level (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022; Browning et al. 2024; Koeser et al. 2024). However, comprehensive surveys are difficult to conduct and rely on sampling, making it challenging to capture a city’s full picture. Iqbal et al. (2025) clarified the achievement status of Component 300 within a population composition of 100-m grids (Iqbal et al. 2025). Aggregating data at the building level or administrative units obscures differences in resident numbers and attributes, rendering it impossible to accurately assess those who lack access to urban green spaces and trees. For instance, if a detached house with 4 residents meets the 3-30-300 rule, whereas an apartment building with 20 residents does not, a building-level analysis will posit that one of the two buildings meets the rule (50%). By contrast, an individual-level analysis will report that only 4 of the 24 residents meet the rule (16.7%). Therefore, assessing the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level is necessary for achieving microscale environmental justice. Considering these limitations, a systematic lack of clarity remains—particularly within the Asian context—regarding the specific demographics and populations failing to meet the 3-30-300 rule.
This study focuses on achievement of the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level in Japanese cities, which is in an under-examined East Asian region. First, in Japan, railways radiating from central Tokyo and Osaka to the suburbs drive urbanization along these rail lines. Consequently, the areas surrounding the stations are densely developed, featuring many residential buildings without gardens, which differ from Western housing (Zheng et al. 2024). However, suburban residential areas possess mixed housing, farmland, and green spaces, due to repeated changes in urban planning and broadly defined zoning (Yokohari et al. 2000; Yagi and Garrod 2018). These residential building types and urban densities strongly correlate with the distribution of urban green spaces and trees within cities and are expected to influence the achievement of the 3-30-300 rule. Second, amid the advancement of digital twin policies, the estimation and open data conversion of high-resolution data are progressing. For example, synthetic population data that estimate individual attributes by combining statistical data with multiple datasets have been created to replicate daily human activity and mobility (Kashiyama et al. 2024). Census data comprises statistical data aggregated at the neighborhood, town blocks, or municipal levels and does not include microdata on the specific individuals (number of people, sex, age, etc.) living in each residential building. By combining individual attribute data with the analysis, predicting the achievement status of the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level is possible.
Therefore, this study aims to develop a methodology for evaluating the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level in Japan’s urban green space provision. It seeks to clarify the impact of different residential building types, urban densities, and different attributes on population groups in achieving the 3-30-300 rule. The findings of this study will provide insights for municipalities experiencing similar urban contexts to improve policies for urban green spaces and trees in East Asia.
Methodology
Study Area and Data
This study focused on the urban area of Himeji City, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan (Figure 1). With a population of 500,000, Himeji City boasts a dual character: it serves as the economic center of Western Hyogo Prefecture and functions as a suburb of the greater Osaka metropolitan area. The area around the Himeji Station is highly urbanized. The Northern part of the station features facilities, such as the World Heritage-listed Himeji Castle and art museums, whereas the Southern part features an office district, including a city hall, surrounded by residential buildings. In the Central and Southern areas, rail and bus networks are well developed, with growing suburban residential zones. The Southern part is known for the Keihanshin Industrial Zone. The Northern part of the city features scattered settlements with fields and farmlands nestled in mountainous areas and valleys. Hills dot the urban landscape, and some of these undeveloped areas within the city have been designated as parks.
Study area: urban areas in Himeji City, Japan.
The data required for this study was obtained from the datasets available for the target area (Table 1). For the location and attributes of all individuals, the Population Attribute Distribution Data from the Pseudo People Flow synthetic population data developed at the national level in Japan was utilized (CSIS 2023; Kashiyama et al. 2024). The dataset refines national statistical data from the 2020 Census Administrative Units, originally aggregated by subregion, to represent information at the level of individual persons (Kashiyama et al. 2024). The estimation model behind this downscaling process reflected on the building’s type, gross floor area, and family type (Kashiyama et al. 2024). Each synthetic individual is assigned latitude and longitude coordinates of the representative points of each residential building, as well as attributes such as household size, age, sex, and occupation (Figure 2) (CSIS 2023). Therefore, it can be used to simulate the residential patterns of individual residents at the micro level, serving as an alternative to censuses that utilize small geographic areas as their unit of aggregation and lack microdata. The accuracy (R2 = 0.81) compared with mobile phone data was reported for the population distribution on a 1,000 m × 1,000 m grid (Kashiyama et al. 2024). These data are publicly available to researchers as part of open data initiatives and have been used in academic research (Garcia-Gabilondo et al. 2024; Ma et al. 2024; Ami et al. 2025).
Data for analysis.
Example of the building data and synthetic population data. The coordinates correspond to representative points of buildings in both datasets; however, the building data contains one building point and its attributes for each building, while the synthetic population data contains multiple individual points and their attributes for each building.
Analytical Framework
This study consisted of 3 steps of evaluation: (1) a multi-level assessment of the 3-30-300 rule both at the individual and building levels; (2) examination of how achievement of the 3-30-300 rule varies across population groups residing in different residential building types and urban densities; and (3) examination of how achievement of the 3-30-300 rule varies across population groups with different attributes.
In the first step, this study compared two evaluation units: the building-level assessment and individual-level assessment. The building-level assessment of the 3-30-300 rule is to examine whether each representative point of residential buildings meet each component. Analysis at the building level allows us to understand the distribution of compliance with the 3-30-300 rule. However, population size varies considerably among residential buildings, with apartments typically accommodating more residents than detached houses, preventing us from accurately identifying the number of residents, differences in their attributes, and those who are unable to access urban green spaces and trees. The individual-level assessment, which is the focus of this study, is to examine whether the specific point coordinates of each population meet each component. In the synthetic population data, the location of each individual has been estimated with high accuracy. The achievement status (met/unmet) of each component of the 3-30-300 rule and the number of components met (unmet, only one met, only two met, and all met) with the 3-30-300 rule using building- and individual-level assessment were examined. Statistical analysis revealed the proportion of the rule met based on the total number of buildings and total number of people as denominators for building-level analysis and individual-level analysis, respectively.
In the second step, residential building types were categorized into 3 groups: apartments, detached houses, and others. Others include those classified as office or “unknown” in building data but considered residential building in the synthetic population data. Urban density was calculated as a continuous variable using the floor area ratio computed for each 100-m mesh.
In the third step, sex and age in the synthetic population data were converted into categorical (male/female) and dummy variables, respectively, with 10-year increments.
Esri ArcGIS Pro 3.4 (Redlands, CA, USA) was used for spatial analysis at each step, and jamovi 2.6.26.0 (The jamovi project, Sydney, Australia) was used for statistical analysis.
Assessment of the 3-30-300 Rule
Component 3: Visibility of Trees from a Residential Building
Component 3 states that 3 trees must be visible from the windows of residential buildings. Tree locations were identified using a tree crown estimation method based on airborne laser survey data (Okatani et al. 2013; Iwahashi et al. 2014; Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2015). In Japan, as part of open data initiatives, high-resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) are publicly available in Hyogo and Shizuoka Prefectures. In step one, a normalized Digital Surface Model (nDSM) was created by subtracting the DEM ground elevation values from a 1-m resolution DSM. Next, the nDSM cells with a maximum value within a 3-m × 3-m area were identified. Subsequently, if a cell overlapped with the green coverage polygon and had a nDSM value of 5 m or higher, its center of gravity was identified as a tree location. The green coverage polygon data was generated from satellite imagery to serve as the fundamental data for evaluating Component 30. Second, the visibility of trees relative to each residential building was determined. Points were generated along the outer perimeter of each building at 1-m intervals. Lines were drawn connecting trees within 30 m of each point. A tree was defined as visible if its line did not intersect buildings and its length was within 30 m as per the methodology of an existing study (Croeser et al. 2024). The number of visible trees was counted at each residential building to determine whether 3 trees were visible from that building. These methods assess the potential visibility of trees from a residential building rather than the actual view from specific windows. Potential limitations of this study include the inability to obtain indoor data, challenges in accounting for views over adjacent buildings from upper-level residential buildings, and difficulties in incorporating additional objects such as fences and signs. However, this method provides a consistent baseline for evaluating Component 3 across the city.
Component 30: Canopy Cover
Component 30 states that 30% tree canopy coverage must be secured in every neighborhood. However, the definition of a neighborhood remains contested. Some studies defined neighborhoods as small blocks delineated by administrative boundaries (Croeser et al. 2024; Iqbal et al. 2025), but the variability in block size and shape complicates comparisons. Other studies defined neighborhoods as fixed-distance buffer zones surrounding each residential building (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022; Owen et al. 2024; Lopez et al. 2025). A 300-m buffer aligns closely with residents’ 5-minute walk to green spaces and trees (Owen et al. 2024). Accordingly, this study adopts a 300-m buffer zone around each residential building as the operational definition of a neighborhood.
To evaluate the 3-30-300 rule using the same process among building and individual levels, the building polygon data was converted into point data. As the difference between the location information of the building points and that of the residents assigned to those buildings is not a fundamental difference, the building points were converted to the same coordinates as the synthetic population points.
This study used multispectral satellite imagery captured by SPOT6 (ESA, Paris, France) on 2020 June 23. Pan-sharpening was performed to achieve a resolution of approximately 1 m. Subsequently, green coverage polygons were constructed using NDVI analysis.
Component 300: Green Space Access
Component 300 required access to green spaces within 300 m of a residential building. Publicly accessible green spaces were defined using park data. Various types of urban parks have been established in Japan based on their size and function. This study focused on neighborhood core parks intended for residents and city core parks intended for citywide use, excluding greenways and buffer green spaces with limited recreational use. Using road network data, a network analysis of walking routes from residential buildings to the nearest park was conducted.
Examination Across Population Groups and Urban Densities
The relationship between the 3 residential building types and the achievement status (met/unmet) of each component as well as the number of components met (unmet, only one met, only two met, and all met) were verified using chi-square test. The building type was identified based on the building data.
The relationships between floor area ratio as an urban density measure and the achievement status as well as the number of components met were investigated using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively.
Examination Across Population Groups with Different Attributes
Chi-square tests were used to examine several relationships: between achievement status (met or unmet) and sex; between achievement status and age; between number of components met (unmet, only one, only two, or all met) and sex; and between number of components met and age.
Results
Status of the 3-30-300 Rule
The analysis revealed that the study area contained 3,194,902 trees, 152.2 km2 of green cover, and 1,168 parks for urban green spaces and trees. It also comprised 88,910 residential buildings and 487,845 individuals.
The analysis demonstrated that 21.7% of residential buildings and 27.5% of individuals met component 3, the capability to see 3 trees. The median number of visible trees was 1.0 per residential building and 1.0 per individual while the average was 2.88 trees per building and 3.47 trees per individual. In both cases, individual-level evaluations exceeded building-level evaluations. Over 35% of the population could not see a single tree from residential buildings, whereas over 20% could see only one tree (Figure 3).
Histogram of visible tree count, green cover ratio, and distance to green spaces at the individual level.
Achieving component 30 was the most difficult. Only 21.0% of the residential buildings and 17.8% of the population could enjoy 30% green cover within 300 m of their residential buildings. The median green cover rates were 11.5% (building level) and 10.0% (individual level), whereas the means were 18.4% (building level) and 16.7% (individual level). In both cases, individual-level assessments exceeded building-level assessments. Conversely, approximately 30% of the population resided in areas with only 5% to 10% of green cover, and over 20% had less than 5% cover (Figure 3).
Achieving component 300 was the easiest. Green space within 300 m was accessible for 65.2% of the residential buildings and 66.3% of the population. The median distance to green space for individuals was 229 m (building level) and 228 m (individual level), whereas the average distance was 292 m (building level) and 285 m (individual level). Most of the population had an access distance of approximately 200 m (Figure 3).
Only 5.5% of the residential buildings and 5.1% of the individuals met all 3 components of the 3-30-300 rule (Table 2); 19.0% of the residential buildings and 21.9% of the population met two components, whereas 53.6% of the residential buildings and 52.4% of the population met only one component. Among these, 7.8% of the residential buildings and 12.9% of the population met components 3 and 300 but failed to meet component 30, indicating that green cover rate was a limiting factor. None of the requirements were met by 22.1% of the residential buildings and 20.6% of the population.
Percentage of the building and population meeting 0 to 3 components of the 3-30-300 rule. C3 (component 3); C30 (component 30); C300 (component 300).
Figure 4 shows that residential buildings that met component 3 were mixed with those that did not, extending from the South to the Central area. Component 30 is concentrated along the urban fringe, Himeji Castle, and rivers. Component 300 demonstrated a mixed distribution of compliant and noncompliant buildings. The areas that failed to meet any of the 3-30-300 rule were located in the Central region, along the coast, and in scattered villages in the North. Conversely, areas meeting all the components were located on the urban fringe.
Maps showing the achievement status of each component of the 3-30-300 rule. (A) Building type; (B) Floor area ratio; (C) Visible tree count; (D) Green cover ratio; (E) Distance to green spaces; (F) Analysis of components.
Residential Building Type and Urban Densities
The Chi-square test revealed that differences in residential building type were significantly associated with meeting the 3-30-300 rule (Table 3). Apartments outperformed detached houses for components 3 and 300, whereas detached houses outperformed apartments for component 30. The proportion of residential building types capable of meeting component 30 was significantly lower in apartments than in detached houses. Only approximately 3.9% of apartments met all 3 components of the 3-30-300 rule compared to approximately 6.0% of detached houses (Table 4). Individuals who met none of the components were 17.8% for apartments and 21.2% for detached houses.
Results of Chi-square tests evaluating the relationships between component status (met and unmet) and residential building type (apartments, detached house, and other); sex (male and female); and age stages, as well as the Mann-Whitney U test evaluating the relationships between component status and floor area ratio. C3 (component 3); C30 (component 30); C300 (component 300); MD (median value); IQR (interquartile range).
Descriptive statistics and the results of the Chi-square test comparing combinations of components met/unmet and residential building type, sex, or age stage, and descriptive statistics and the results of the Kruskal-Wallis test comparing 0 to 3 components met/unmet and floor area ratio. C3 (component 3); C30 (component 30); C300 (component 300); MD (median value); IQR (interquartile range).
The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant relationship between the surrounding floor area ratio and compliance with the 3-30-300 rule (Table 3). Figure 4 demonstrates the average surrounding floor area ratio at the 100-m mesh level. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed differences among multiple components: individuals meeting all 3 components were located in areas with 43.9% floor area ratio, whereas those who failed to meet any component were located in areas with 62.1% floor area ratio (Table 4).
Individual Attributes
The Chi-square test displayed no significant differences in sex for components 3 or 300; however, a higher proportion of males met component 30 (Table 3). Approximately 5.1% of males and 5.0% of females met all 3 components, and 20.5% of males and 20.613.4% of females failed to meet any component (Table 4).
The Chi-square test revealed age-related differences for all components (Table 3). Components 3 and 30 exhibited higher proportions of being met among the older age groups. The green cover ratio was relatively high across the younger age groups, with notably low values observed in the working-age population. Conversely, component 300 was higher among younger age groups and the working-age population and lower among older age groups. Approximately 5.5% of the 60 to 69 age group met all components, although low values were observed in the working-age population (Table 4).
Discussion
Status of the 3-30-300 Rule
The results for Himeji City show that only 5.5% of the buildings and 5.1% of the individuals met all aspects of the 3-30-300 rule. While a precise comparison is not possible owing to differences in methodology across studies, the score in Himeji City outperforms Barcelona (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022), Florence (Lopez et al. 2025), and Xiamen (Zheng et al. 2024); however, it significantly lags behind Singapore (Croeser et al. 2024) and the Netherlands (Helbich et al. 2025). The results indicate that, despite the 3-30-300 rule being established as a target for the well-being of all residents (Konijnendijk, 2022; Konijnendijk, 2023), Himeji City reports insufficient urban green spaces and trees.
The findings of this study indicate that achieving Component 30 within the rule is particularly challenging. This trend is consistent with the findings from Turin (Italy)(Battisti et al. 2024), Barcelona (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022), and a comparison of 6 global cities (Croeser et al. 2024), but the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. In Europe, high building density and historic street layouts often limit the space for canopy expansion. By contrast, Himeji’s challenges are likely influenced by the transformation of residential gardens and street trees. Although our spatial analysis did not directly assess temporal changes, evidence shows that reductions in trees in the backyards of residential buildings are observed because of the subdivision of long-standing estates into multiple detached houses or redevelopment projects involving apartments (Shiraishi and Terada 2024). Street trees face issues such as insufficient planting space and excessive pruning, preventing tree canopy expansion (Fujii 2022; Egerer et al. 2024), and a fundamental lack of street-tree planting, particularly in areas distant from stations.
The relative ease of achieving Component 300 is possibly related to urban planning. Residential building development in Japan often occurs on a small scale and involves the conversion of farmland, vacant lots, or large single houses into detached housing areas (Takatori 2000; Nakahara and Hoshino 2006). In Japan, the provision of parks or similar facilities is required in residential building development above a certain size. However, some small parks remain unused, fail to meet local needs, and provide almost no ecosystem services (Okamoto et al. 2024). This suggests that meeting Component 300 alone is insufficient if the quality and usability of urban green spaces are lacking. Future implementation of the 3-30-300 rule in the Japanese context should consider not only the distance but also the functional capacity of these urban green spaces to ensure their alignment with the rule’s purpose.
Residential Building Type and Urban Densities
Residential building type and the 3-30-300 rule were related. Meeting Component 30 and the overall 3-30-300 rule were more advantageous for detached houses. Component 30 can only be met on the fringes of urban areas, where apartments are rarely constructed. The fringe of urban areas was characterized by a “satoyama” landscape, where residential buildings and forests coexisted (Takeuchi 2010; Takeuchi et al. 2016). This environment was used to support activities such as firewood and charcoal collection as well as agricultural work before industrialization. In addition, during the period of rapid economic growth, the construction of new towns and housing developments progressed in the fringe area of urban locations (Kato and Takizawa 2024). Conversely, apartments have advantages in components 3 and 300. Apartments are frequently situated along main roads in central urban areas. Residents of these residential buildings may observe street trees, with notable variations in street tree density among different street classes (Smart et al. 2020). Additionally, some apartments have trees planted on their grounds. Conversely, some detached houses only face narrow streets, making it more difficult for them to benefit from street trees. The number of detached houses without gardens and residents who plant less trees in their gardens have increased in recent years (Itahana and Terada 2022; Shiraishi and Terada 2024).
A relationship between urban density and the 3-30-300 rule also exists. Specifically, a higher floor area ratio made it more difficult to meet Component 30 and all components, but it was easier to meet Component 300. Component 30 was met in the urban fringe, which can provide an extensive canopy in satoyama landscape (Takeuchi 2010; Takeuchi et al. 2016), whereas Component 300 was met in the urban center, wherein parks have been developed.
The disparities observed across residential building types and urban densities in Himeji City align with the global discussion of loss of public and private urban green space in compact city and densification (Haaland and Konijnendijk 2015), wherein high-density apartment areas facilitate park access but limit canopy cover. However, differences between Himeji City and other cities exist. In Europe and the United States, low-density detached houses are typically located in affluent areas characterized by substantial tree cover and access to parks (Locke et al. 2021). Some cities such as Singapore implement policies that promote vertical greening, rooftop greening, and large-scale green spaces (McDonald et al. 2023), mitigating the lack of green spaces in dense apartment areas.
Individual Attributes
Negligible differences were observed in terms of sex; however, differences according to generation were observed. Components 3 and 30 were achieved more frequently by the elderly, whereas younger people and the working-age population achieved Component 300. Component 30 is thought to be influenced by the aging of urban fringe areas, whereas Component 300 is believed to be influenced by recent developments that have secured access to small parks. Improved access to parks is important for younger generations, as it helps secure children’s play areas and educational opportunities (Chawla 2015). However, it also plays a significant role for the elderly by providing walking paths and opportunities for physical activity (Zhai et al. 2020).
These findings indicate disparities in the equitable access to urban green spaces (Wen et al. 2013; Yu et al. 2023). However, the situation varies by city. In Hannover, Germany, studies have revealed that older adults have limited access to green spaces as well as disparities in access to the types of green spaces that offer age-related requirements (Weber et al. 2023). However, in Szeged, Hungary, research has revealed that areas with abundant green spaces tend to boast higher concentrations of older adults (Kolcsár et al. 2022). The case of Himeji City illustrates a unique mismatch between people and space, characterized by the aging of suburban areas and the return to the city center of the working-age population. Populations that are unable to meet the 3-30-300 rule may face heightened health risks and increased vulnerability to social isolation. Therefore, conducting analyses from a social inclusion perspective, focusing specifically on child-rearing households and low-income groups, is necessary.
Building- and Individual-Level Evaluations
This study evaluated the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level. Discrepancies were observed between the building- and individual-level evaluations. For components 3 and 300, individual-level evaluations exceeded building-level evaluations. However, only 5.5% of the residential buildings and 5.1% of the population fully met all components. For those failing to meet any component, individual-level evaluations were lower than building-level evaluations: 22.1% of the residential buildings and 20.6% of the population.
Aggregating data into administrative and building units often masks intraneighborhood disparities, a phenomenon known as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). By using synthetic population data, this study overcomes this limitation and visualizes microscale environmental injustices. This big data approach to mitigating the MAUP (Dalton and Thatcher 2015; Luo et al. 2025) allows urban planners to identify specific neighborhoods and demographic clusters, enabling more targeted resource allocation to achieve the 3-30-300 rule.
The individual-level evaluation conducted in this study indicates the need for distinct greening strategies to address specific environmental injustice. In detached housing areas, where private gardens are shrinking (Itahana and Terada 2022; Shiraishi and Terada 2024), incentives to preserve existing trees and prevent full-site paving to enhance tree visibility are suggested. Conversely, for apartments in high-density areas with working-age populations, public strategies include providing street trees along commuting corridors and enhancing green roofs and vertical greening rather than new park provision.
Limitations
This study utilized synthetic population data to identify individual locations. While synthetic population data offers great accuracy (Kashiyama et al. 2024), it does not capture actual residential conditions. Because it is generated using models based on statistical data, individuals who significantly deviate from these models, such as those in large families, may not be accurately represented. Nevertheless, for the purpose of identifying individual locations, this dataset is superior to others in terms of accuracy and sample size. Despite its limitations, the dataset remains valuable for analyzing the regional context of the 3-30-300 rule.
The evaluation methods for the 3-30-300 rule also present certain limitations. For Component 3, the building perimeter was divided into 1-m intervals, and lines were drawn from these points to estimate trees within 30 m. Instances where the lines did not intersect the building were considered visible as per the methodology of an existing study (Croeser et al. 2024). This approach does not account for the actual number of floors or the presence of objects other than buildings. Furthermore, tree locations were determined using tree estimation based on high-resolution DSM and DEM (Okatani et al. 2013; Iwahashi et al. 2014; Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2015). Owing to the difficulty of obtaining actual data, this simplified evaluation method is commonly employed. However, the discrepancy between this method and real-world conditions should be acknowledged as a methodological limitation.
For Component 30, the definition of a neighborhood remains contested: small blocks delineated by administrative boundaries and fixed-distance buffer zones surrounding each residential building. This study adopts a 300-m buffer zone around each residential building as the operational definition of a neighborhood (Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2022; Owen et al. 2024; Lopez et al. 2025). Consequently, comparing regions without having to worry about block size or shape is now easy.
The data used in this study is cross-sectional in nature, and thus identifying causal relationships based on time series data, such as the decline in gardens or the pruning of street trees, was not possible. Further analysis using such time series data is required for prediction of trends based on current vegetation and urban planning.
Conclusion
This study developed a method to evaluate the 3-30-300 rule at the individual level, clarifying its impact on population groups residing in different residential building types and urban densities, as well as on groups with varying attributes in the Japanese context. The results demonstrated that, akin to other cities worldwide, only a small proportion of the population fully meets the 3-30-300 rule, with particular challenges in achieving Component 30. However, their underlying mechanisms differ from those in Europe and America and are likely influenced by structural factors such as reductions in private gardens and street trees. Reflecting Japan’s high-density urban structure, apartments found it harder to meet the overall 3-30-300 rule, whereas residential buildings with higher floor area ratios struggled to meet Component 30. Older age groups achieved components 3 and 30 more readily, whereas younger age groups and the working-age population achieved Component 300 more frequently. These findings reveal a gap between building- and individual-level assessments, demonstrating that individual-level evaluation significantly helps identify microscale environmental injustices.
A scenario analysis indicated that substantial interventions are required to raise compliance levels from the current low baseline to meet the 3-30-300 rule (Owen et al. 2024). The significance of this study lies in its ability to visualize outcomes at the microscale level by residential building type, urban density, and individual attributes, thus enabling policy prioritization. Considering that allocating limited resources is a core challenge in urban planning, such prioritization is crucial for achieving the 3-30-300 rule. However, careful consideration of the local context, such as historical reasons for park distribution, is essential.
Conflicts of Interest
The author reported no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI [grant number: 25K17753]. This work was the result of the joint research with CSIS and the University of Tokyo (No. 1459) and used the following data: Pseudo People Flow: Personal Attribute Dataset (Hyogo), Zmap TOWN II 2022 Shapefile Hyogo prefecture, and Digital Road Map Database extended version 2023.
- © 2026 International Society of Arboriculture
Literature Cited
- ↵Ami J, Pang Y, Masui H, Okumura T, Sekimoto Y. 2025. Advancing the sensitivity frontier in digital contact tracing: Comparative analysis of proposed methods toward maximized utility. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 53:101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2025.101622
- ↵Battisti L, Giacco G, Moraca M, Pettenati G, Dansero E, Larcher F. 2024. Spatializing urban forests as nature-based solutions: A methodological proposal. Cities. 144:104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104629
- ↵Bolund P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics. 29(2):293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
- ↵Browning MHEM, Locke DH, Konijnendijk C, Labib SM, Rigolon A, Yeager R, Bardhan M, Berland A, Dadvand P, Helbich M, Li F, Li H, James P, Klompmaker J, Reuben A, Roman LA, Tsai WL, Patwary M, O’Neil-Dunne J, Ossola A, Wang R, Yang B, Yi L, Zhang J, Nieuwenhuijsen M. 2024. Measureing the 3-30-300 rule to help cities meet nature access thresholds. The Science of the Total Environment. 907:167739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167739
- ↵Center for Spatial Information Science (CSIS). 2023. About pseudo people flow data. Tokyo (Japan): The University of Tokyo. [Accessed 2026 January 28]. https://pflow.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/data-provision-service/about-pseudo-people-flow-data
- ↵Chawla L. 2015. Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature. 30(4):433-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441
- ↵Croeser T, Sharma R, Weisser WW, Bekessy SA. 2024. Acute canopy deficits in global cities exposed by the 3-30-300 benchmark for urban nature. Nature Communications. 15:9333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53402-2
- ↵Dalton CM, Thatcher J. 2015. Inflated granularity: Spatial “Big Data” and geodemographics. Big Data & Society. 2(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715601144
- ↵Egerer M, Schmack JM, Vega K, Barona CO, Raum S. 2024. The challenges of urban street trees and how to overcome them. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 6:1394056. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1394056
- ↵Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel SN, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut JN, Gómez-Baggethun E, Nowak DJ, Kronenberg J, de Groot R. 2015. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 14:101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
- ↵European Commission. 2020. EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. Brussels (Belgium): European Comission. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en
- ↵Fang X, Li J, Ma Q. 2023. Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 98:104843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
- ↵Fujii E. 2022. Changes and problems of the technique and management organization concerning a street tree. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 85(4):298-303. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.85.298
- ↵Garcia-Gabilondo S, Shibuya Y, Sekimoto Y. 2024. Enhancing geospatial retail analysis by integrating synthetic human mobility simulations. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 108:102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.102058
- ↵Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. 2015. Creation of tree height data using aerial laser survey data. Tsukuba City (Ibaraki, Japan): Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. [Accessed 2025 November 27; Updated 2015 February 1]. https://www.gsi.go.jp/chirijoho/chirijoho40069.html
- ↵Haaland C, Konijnendijk van den Bosch C. 2015. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):760-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
- ↵Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. 2014. Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health. 35:207-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
- ↵Helbich M, Browning MHEM, Voets D, Dadvand P. 2025. Adherence to the 3+30+300 urban green space rule and mental health, physical activity, and overweight: A population-based study in the Netherlands. Environment International. 202:109643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109643
- ↵Iqbal LM, Njaim GA, Vos D, Permana CTH. 2025. Parks please! Implementing the 3-30-300 green space rule in developing countries: The case of Surakarta, Indonesia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 107:128797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128797
- ↵Itahana D, Terada T. 2022. Trends of garden trees within detached residential housing by development decade in Kashiwa City, Chiba, Japan. Landscape Research Japan Online. 15:63-70. https://doi.org/10.5632/jilaonline.15.63
- ↵Iwahashi J, Okatani T, Nakano T, Koarai M, Otoi K. 2014. Landslide susceptibility analysis by terrain and vegetation attributes derived from pre-event LiDAR data: A case study of granitic mountain slopes in Hofu, Japan. In: INTERPRAENENT2014 in the Pacific Rim. 2014 November 25–28; Nara, Japan. 20 p.
- ↵Kashiyama T, Pang Y, Shibuya Y, Yabe T, Sekimoto Y. 2024. Nationwide synthetic human mobility dataset construction from limited travel surveys and open data. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 39(21):3337-3353. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.13285
- ↵Kato H, Takizawa A. 2024. Urban transformation and population decline in old New Towns in the Osaka Metropolitan Area. Cities. 149:104991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104991
- ↵Koeser AK, Hauer RJ, Andreu MG, Northrop R, Clarke M, Diaz J, Hilbert DR, Konijnendijk CC, Landry SM, Thompson GL, Zarger R. 2024. Using the 3-30-300 rule to assess urban forest access and preferences in Florida (United States). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 50(3):241-257. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2024.007
- ↵Kolcsár RA, Csete ÁK, Kovács-Győri A, Szilassi P. 2022. Age-group-based evaluation of residents’ urban green space provision: Szeged, Hungary. A case study. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin. 71(3):249-269. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.3.3
- ↵Konijnendijk C. 2022. The 3-30-300 rule for urban forestry and greener cities. Biophilic Cities Journal. 4(2):12-15.
- ↵Konijnendijk CC. 2023. Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3-30-300 rule. Journal of Forestry Research. 34:821-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01523-z
- ↵Livesley SJ, McPherson EG, Calfapietra C. 2016. The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. Journal of Environmental Quality. 45(1):119-124. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567
- ↵Locke DH, Hall B, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Ogden LA, Aoki C, Boone CG, O’Neil-Dunne JPM. 2021. Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US Cities. Npj Urban Sustainability. 1:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00022-0
- ↵Lopez MA, De Marco A, Anav A, Sorrentino B, Paoletti E, Manzini J, Hoshika Y, Sicard P. 2025. The 3-30-300 rule compliance: A geospatial tool for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. 261:105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105396
- ↵Luo C, Hu Y, Wang F. 2025 A big data approach to mitigating the MAUP in measuring excess commuting. Computational Urban Science. 5:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00173-1
- ↵Ma J, Shibuya Y, Pang Y, Omata H, Sekimoto Y. 2024. A cost-and-effect simulation model for compact city approaches: A case study in Japan. Cities. 152:105212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105212
- ↵McDonald RI, Aronson MFJ, Beatley T, Beller E, Bazo M, Grossinger R, Jessup K, Mansur AV, Puppim de Oliveira JA, Panlasigui S, Burg J, Pevzner N, Shanahan D, Stoneburner L, Rudd A, Spotswood E. 2023. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People and Nature. 5(1):84-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10423
- ↵Morgenroth J, Doick K, Hauer R, Locke DH, Barona CO, Roman LA, Conway TM, Dobbs C, Duinker P, Gulsrud NM, Jim CY, Koeser AK, Landry S, Livesley S, Nesbitt L, Shackleton CM, Tan PY, Yang J. 2025. Urban tree cover targets: The good, the bad and the SMART. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 112:128979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128979
- ↵Nakahara Y, Hoshino S. 2006. The present condition and problems on urban farmland: Case study of the West Ward in Kobe City. Journal of Rural Planning Association. 25(Special_Issue): 437-442. https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.25.437
- ↵Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Dadvand P, Márquez S, Bartoll X, Barboza EP, Cirach M, Borrell C, Zijlema WL. 2022. The evaluation of the 3-30-300 green space rule and mental health. Environmental Research. 215(2):114387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114387
- ↵Noszczyk T, Gorzelany J, Kukulska-Kozieł A, Hernik J. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public. Land Use Policy. 113:105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105925
- ↵Okamoto S, Inaguma T, Okamoto K, Tanaka Y. 2024. Implementation of planning for reorganization of urban small parks’ functions. Technical Reports of Landscape Architecture. 3:10-15. https://doi.org/10.60235/jilatech.3.0_10
- ↵Okatani T, Otoi K, Nakano T, Koarai M. 2013. Acquisition of 3D structure of forest from LIDAR data at Izumozaki district in Niigata prefecture. Journal of the Japan Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 52(2):56-68. https://doi.org/10.4287/jsprs.52.56
- ↵Owen D, Fitch A, Fletcher D, Knopp J, Levin G, Farley K, Banzhaf E, Zandersen M, Grandin G, Jones L. 2024. Opportunities and constraints of implementing the 3-30-300 rule for urban greening. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 98:128393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128393
- ↵Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I, editors. 2011. Peri-urbanisation in Europe: Towards European policies to sustain urban-rural futures. Copenhagen (Denmark): University of Copenhagen, Academic Books Life Sciences. 142 p.
- ↵Shiraishi K, Terada T. 2024. Tokyo’s urban tree challenge: Decline in tree canopy cover in Tokyo from 2013 to 2022. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 97:128331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128331
- ↵Smart N, Eisenman TS, Karvonen A. 2020. Street tree density and distribution: An international analysis of five capital cities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 8:562646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.562646
- ↵Smith ES, Fleet C, Gosal AS, King S, Walker H, Willey I, Scott CE. 2026. Which trees matter most? The role of private garden trees and woodland cover for 3-30-300 success in seven English cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 116:129221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129221
- ↵Takatori Y. 2000. The multi-functional system of urban agriculture in the suburbs of Tokyo: A case study in the Nishi-Ooizumi area of Nerima Ward, Tokyo. The Journal of Geography. 109(3):401-417. https://doi.org/10.5026/jgeography.109.3_401
- ↵Takeuchi K. 2010. Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: The satoyama initiative. Ecological Research. 25(5):891-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8
- ↵Takeuchi K, Ichikawa K, Elmqvist T. 2016. Satoyama landscape as social–ecological system: Historical changes and future perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 19:30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.001
- ↵Vesuviano G, Fitch A, Owen D, Fletcher D, Jones L. 2025. How well does the 3-30-300 rule mitigate urban flooding? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 104:128661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128661
- ↵Weber R, Haase A, Albert C. 2023. Access to urban green spaces in Hannover: An exploration considering age groups, recreational nature qualities and potential demand. Ambio. 52:631-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01808-x
- ↵Wen M, Zhang X, Harris CD, Holt JB, Croft JB. 2013. Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 45(suppl_1):S18-S27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9426-x
- ↵World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. 2016. Urban green spaces and health. Copenhagen (Denmark): World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. WHO/EURO:2016-3352-43111-60341. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/345751
- ↵Yagi H, Garrod G. 2018. The future of agriculture in the shrinking suburbs: The impact of real estate income and housing costs. Land Use Policy. 76:812-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.013
- ↵Yokohari M, Takeuchi K, Watanabe T, Yokota S. 2000. Beyond greenbelts and zoning: A new planning concept for the environment of Asian mega-cities. Landscape and Urban Planning. 47(3-4):159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00084-5
- ↵Yu L, Zhao P, Tang J, Pang L, Gong Z. 2023. Social inequality of urban park use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 10:423. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01918-1
- ↵Zhai Y, Li D, Wang D, Shi C. 2020. Seniors’ physical activity in neighborhood parks and park design characteristics. Frontiers in Public Health. 8:322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00322
- ↵Zheng Y, Lin T, Hamm NAS, Liu J, Zhou T, Geng H, Zhang J, Ye H, Zhang G, Wang X, Chen T. 2024. Quantitative evaluation of urban green exposure and its impact on human health: A case study on the 3-30-300 green space rule. Science of the Total Environment. 924:171461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171461





