Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Location of Lisbon, Portugal (dots represent the study area locations).
- Figure 2.
Locations of the parishes and gardens studied in Lisbon.
- Figure 3.
Teófilo Braga Garden tree inventory.
- Figure 4.
França Borges Garden tree inventory.
- Figure 5.
Guerra Junqueiro Garden tree inventory.
- Figure 6.
Altered management scenarios in Teófilo Braga Garden: (#2) MEI scenario; (#3) DO scenario; (#4) RMT scenario.
- Figure 7.
Comparison of average DBH (mean ± 95% CI) for main selected species in Garden and Street trees. The numbers of specimens studied in gardens and streets are in brackets.
- Figure 8.
Comparison of average canopy cover (mean ± 95% CI) for main selected species in Garden and Street trees. The numbers of specimens studied in gardens and streets are in brackets.
- Figure 9.
Average carbon sequestration (mean ± 95% CI) for main selected species in Garden and Street trees. The numbers of specimens studied in gardens and streets are in brackets.
- Figure 10.
Average stormwater management (mean ± 95% CI) for main selected species in Garden and Street trees. The numbers of specimens studied in gardens and streets are in brackets.
- Figure 11.
Average air pollutant removal (mean ± 95% CI) for main selected species in Garden and Street trees. The numbers of specimens studied in gardens and streets are in brackets.
Tables
Abundance (n) Density (n/ha) Richness (S) Shannon (H’) Evenness (E) Dominance (%) Teófilo Braga 103 314 19 1.33 0.45 77 Guerra Junqueiro 632 35 117 4.08 0.86 14 França Borges 157 131 43 2.74 0.73 45 Street trees 6,928 - 131 3.67 0.73 24 Total 7,820 - 214 3.85 0.72 24 - Table 2.
Vegetation composition average value comparison between streets trees and studied gardens.
Abundance (n) Dominance (%) DBH (cm) Height (m) Crown width (m) Canopy cover (m2) Street trees 6,928 24 28.37 10.42 6.62 43.90 Garden trees 892 26 39.09 12.78 8.54 77.66 - Table 3.
Scenario results for structures and ES in the Teófilo Braga Garden. ES (ecosystem services); BAU (Business as Usual); MEI (Metro Expansion Impact); DO (Disease Outbreak); RMT (Removal of Monumental Trees).
Trees structures ES Canopy cover (ha) Average DBH growth (cm) Avoided runoff (m3) Carbon sequestration (kg) 1. BAU 1.09 0.40 62.4 350 2. MEI 0.96 0.41 51.7 350 3. DO 0.77 0.41 46.8 340 4. RMT 1.02 0.41 57.6 340
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.