Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   1. Dash JP,
   2. Pearse GD,
   3. Watt MS.

   2018. UAV multispectral imagery can complement satellite data for monitoring forest health. Remote Sensing. 10(8):1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081216

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Dunster JA,
   2. Smiley ET,
   3. Matheny N,
   4. Lilly S.

   2017. Tree risk assessment manual. 2nd Ed. Atlanta (GA, USA): International Society of Arboriculture. 194 p.
3. ↵
   1. Feng X,
   2. Li P.

   2019. A tree species mapping method from UAV images over urban area using similarity in tree-crown object histograms. Remote Sensing. 11(17):1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171982

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Gao M,
   2. Hugenholtz CH,
   3. Fox TA,
   4. Kucharczyk M,
   5. Barchyn TE,
   6. Nesbit PR.

   2021. Weather constraints on global drone flyability. Scientific Reports. 11:12092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91325-w

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Kas KA,
   2. Johnson GK.

   2019. Using unmanned aerial vehicles and robotics in hazardous locations safely. Process Safety Progress. 39(1):e12066. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12066

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Koeser AK,
   2. Smiley ET.

   2017. Impact of assessor on tree risk assessment ratings and prescribed mitigation measures. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 24:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.027

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Kottek M,
   2. Grieser J,
   3. Beck C,
   4. Rudolf B,
   5. Rubel F.

   2006. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 15(3):259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Kouadio L, El
   2. Jarroudi M,
   3. Belabess Z,
   4. Laasli SE,
   5. Roni MZK,
   6. Amine IDI,
   7. Mokhtari N,
   8. Mokrini F,
   9. Junk J,
   10. Lahlali R.

   2023. A review on UAV-based applications for plant disease detection and monitoring. Remote Sensing. 15(17):4273. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174273

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Kulhavy DL,
   2. Unger DR,
   3. Hung IK,
   4. Zhang Y.

   2016. Comparison of AR.drone quadricopter video and the visual CTLA method for urban tree hazard rating. Journal of Forestry. 114(5):517–523. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-005

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Kumar R, Rohit
    2. Kumar G,
    3. Zunaid M,
    4. Ansari NA.

    2021. Numerical analysis of quadcopter in different weather conditions of regions in India. Materials Today: Proceedings. 43(1): 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.681
11. ↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Wen J,
    5. Tan X.

    2022. A review of research on tree risk assessment methods. Forests. 13(10):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101556

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Hao Z,
    3. Post CJ,
    4. Mikhailova EA.

    2023. Protection of coastal shelter forests using UAVs: Individual tree and treeheight detection in Casuarina equisetifolia L. forests. Forests. 14(2):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020233

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Mariani MM,
    2. Machado I,
    3. Nambisan S.

    2023. Types of innovation and artificial intelligence: A systematic quantitative literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 155(B):113364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113364

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. McKenzie JE,
    3. Bossuyt PM,
    4. Boutron I,
    5. Hoffmann TC,
    6. Mulrow CD,
    7. Shamseer L,
    8. Tetzlaff JM,
    9. Akl EA,
    10. Brennan SE,
    11. Chou R,
    12. Glanville J,
    13. Grimshaw JM,
    14. Hróbjartsson A,
    15. Lalu MM,
    16. Li T,
    17. Loder EW,
    18. Mayo-Wilson E,
    19. McDonald S,
    20. McGuinness LA,
    21. Stewart LA,
    22. Thomas J,
    23. Tricco AC,
    24. Welch VA,
    25. Whiting P,
    26. Moher D.

    2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 10:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Parker J,
    2. de Baro MEZ.

    2019. Green infrastructure in the urban environment: A systematic quantitative review. Sustainability. 11(11):3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Pradipta E,
    2. Kholis N,
    3. Lestari F,
    4. Bowolaksono A.

    2018. Tree risk identification, assessment and mitigation in Universitas Indonesia’s urban forest. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 203:012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/203/1/012026

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Roussos PA.

    2024. Climate change challenges in temperate and sub-tropical fruit tree cultivation. Encyclopedia. 4(1):558–582. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4010036

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Song XP,
    2. Tan PY,
    3. Edwards P,
    4. Richards D.

    2018. The economic benefits and costs of trees in urban forest stewardship: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 29:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.017

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Stewart MP,
    2. Martin ST.

    2021. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Fundamentals, components, mechanics, and regulations. In: Barrera N, editor. Unmanned aerial vehicles. Hauppauge (NY, USA): Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 70 p. https://novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicles.pdf
20. ↵
    1. Yazicioglu O,
    2. Borat O.

    2020. Risk assessment and mitigation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Archives of Current Research International. 20(7):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2020/v20i730206

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Zhang N,
    2. Chai X,
    3. Li N,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Sun T.

    2023. Applicability of UAV-based optical imagery and classification algorithms for detecting pine wilt disease at different infection stages. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 60(1):2170479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2023.2170479

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Guan X,
    5. Delahaye D,
    6. Tang L.

    2018. Safety assessment and risk estimation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles operating in national airspace system. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2018(1):4731585. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4731585

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Zhao G,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Lan Y,
    4. Deng J,
    5. Zhang Q,
    6. Zhang Z,
    7. Li Z,
    8. Liu L,
    9. Huang X,
    10. Ma J.

    2023. Application progress of UAV-LARS in identification of crop diseases and pests. Agronomy. 13(9):2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092232

    OpenUrl