Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
The systematic literature review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, ensuring a standardized and comprehensive approach to reporting and evaluating the included studies.
- Figure 2.
The annual publication rates of articles incorporating ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in tree risk assessment’ without any restrictions on publication years (n = 27).
- Figure 3.
Reporting the publication rates of climate categories, including the ± 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.
- Figure 4.
Reporting the publication rates, along with ± 95% confidence intervals, for the proportions of article types within categories.
- Figure 5.
Reporting the rates of focus area distribution among publications, including ± 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.
Tables
Data marker Data type Description Article ID Numeric Identification numbers, ranging from 1 to 27, were assigned to facilitate the cataloging of research throughout the review process. Authors Text Authors’ names as listed in the article. Year Date Year of publication. Title Text Title of article. Journal title Text Journal title of publication. Volume/issue/pages Numeric Article’s volume, issue, and page numbers as listed in the publication. Data marker Data type Description Location for macro publication Categorical 1 = Malaysia
2 = International (countries other than Malaysia)
3 = Global (having a wide-ranging focus that doesn’t specify particular countries)Country Text The country of publication as indicated in the article. Region/state Text Publication region/state as it appeared in the article.
NA = Not applicable
NS = Not specifiedCity/town Text The city or town of publication as mentioned in the article.
NA = Not applicable
NS = Not specifiedClimate category Categorical 1 = Equatorial
2 = Arid
3 = Mediterranean
4 = Temperate
5 = Snow
6 = Polar
NA = Not applicable
NS = Not specifiedArticle type Data type Description Review article Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoResearch article Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoCase study Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoFocus areas Data type Description Plant pest and diseases Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoPlant stress Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoPlant threats Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = No3D tree modeling Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoEcosystem degradation Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoPlant characteristics Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoUnreachable zone Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = NoOther Categorical 1 = Yes
0 = No- Table 5.
Correlation coefficients used to assess trends among the article focus areas within the testing group.
Plant pest/diseases Plant stress Plant threats 3D tree modeling Ecosystem degradation Plant characteristics Unreachable zone Plant pest and diseases 1.000 Plant stress 0.963 1.000 Plant threats 0.943 0.980 1.000 3D tree modeling 0.943 0.980 1.000 1.000 Ecosystem degradation –0.343 –0.356 –0.250 –0.250 1.000 Plant characteristics 0.943 0.980 1.000 1.000 –0.250 1.000 Unreachable zone –0.343 –0.134 –0.250 –0.250 –0.250 –0.250 1.000
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.