Branch Break Assessment: An Unexpected Accident with a Professional Arborist

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   American National Standards Institute. 2017. American National Standard for Arboricultural Operations—Safety Requirements (ANSI Z133-2017). Champaign (IL, USA): International Society of Arboriculture.
2. ↵
   1. Anderson DL,
   2. Koomjian W,
   3. French B,
   4. Altenhoff SR,
   5. Luce J.

   2015. Review of rope-based access methods for the forest canopy: Safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6:865–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12393

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. 2019. Urban forests— Tree, shrub and other woody plant management. Part 3: Tree risk assessment. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): ABNT. NBR 16246-3. 20 p. https://saturno.crea-rs.org.br/pop/profissional/ABNT_NBR_16246_3_2019.pdf
4. ↵
   1. Ball J.

   2022. Tree-worker safety update by the number: Another us vs. them. Tree Care Industry Magazine. 33(2):51–55. https://tcimag.tcia.org/magazine-archive

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Ball J,
   2. Vosberg S.

   2010. A survey of United States tree care companies: Part I—Safety training and fatal accidents. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 36(5):224–229. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2010.030

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Ball J,
   2. Vosberg S,
   3. Walsh T.

   2020 A review of United States arboricultural operation fatal and nonfatal incidents (2001–2017): Implications for safety training. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 46(2):67–83. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2020.006

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Castillo DN,
   2. Menéndez CKC.

   2009. Work-related fatalities associated with tree care operations–United States, 1992–2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 58(15):389–393. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5815a2.htm

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   Comisión Panamericana de Normas Técnicas (COPANT). 1973. Maderas: Método de ensayo de flexión estática. Buenos Aires (Argentina): COPANT. 555 abr1973 ej.1.
9. ↵
   1. de Mello DC,
   2. Modes KS,
   3. Vivian MA.

   2021. Influência do teor de umidade nas propriedades em flexão estática de quatro espécies nativas do Planalto Serrano Catarinense. In: Madeiras Nativas e Plantadas do Brasil: Qualidade, Pesquisas e Atualidades. Volume 2. p. 131–143. https://doi.org/10.37885/211106780

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Dial RJ,
    2. Sillett SC,
    3. Antoine ME,
    4. Spickler JC.

    2004. Methods for horizontal movement through forest canopies. Selbyana. 25(1):151–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/41760153

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Didham RK,
    2. Fagan LL.

    2004. ECOLOGY | Forest canopies. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist JA, editors. Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Oxford (United Kingdom): Elsevier. p. 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-145160-7/00013-2
12. ↵
    1. Harris J.

    2010. Working the angles: Understanding force vectors in tree climbing. Ringwood (Victoria, Australia): Victorian Tree Industry Organization. https://vtio.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Working-the-Angles-i.pdf
13. ↵
    1. Jepson J.

    2000. The tree climber’s companion: A reference and training manual for professional tree climbers. 2nd Ed. Longville (MN, USA): Beaver Tree Publishing. 104 p.
14. ↵
    1. Julius AK,
    2. Kane B,
    3. Bulzacchelli MT,
    4. Ryan HDP.

    2014. Compliance with the ANSI Z133.1—2006 safety standard among arborists in New England. Journal of Safety Research. 51:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSR.2014.09.010

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kane B.

    2021. Forces and motion associated with arboricultural climbing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 57:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126944

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Lilly S,
    2. Julius AK.

    2021. Tree climber’s guide. 4th Ed. Atlanta (GA, USA): International Society of Arboriculture. 272 p.
17. ↵
    1. Lowman M,
    2. Rinker HB.

    2004. Forest canopies. 2nd Ed. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press, Elsevier. 544 p.
18. ↵
    1. Marshall EG,
    2. Lu SE,
    3. Williams AO,
    4. Lefkowitz D,
    5. Borjan M.

    2018. Tree-related injuries associated with response and recovery from Hurricane Sandy, New Jersey, 2011–2014. Public Health Reports. 133(3):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918766871

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Robb W,
    2. Cocking J.

    2014. Review of European chainsaw fatalities, accidents and trends. Arboricultural Journal. 36(2):103–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2014.913944

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Shigo AL.

    2008. A new tree biology: Facts, photos, and philosophies on trees and their problems and proper care. Snohomish (WA, USA): Shigo and Trees Associates. 619 p.
21. ↵
    1. Sillett SC,
    2. Antoine ME.

    2004. Lichens and bryophytes in forest canopies. In: Lowman MD, Rinker HB, editors. Forest canopies. 2nd Ed. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press, Elsevier. p. 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012457553-0/50013-7
22. ↵
    1. Staněk L,
    2. Augustin O,
    3. Neruda J.

    2022. Analysis of occupational accidents in tree climbers. Forests. 13(9):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091518

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Tattar TA.

    1989. Wound diseases—Discoloration and decay in living trees. In: Diseases of shade trees. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press, Elsevier. p. 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-684351-4.50019-3
24. ↵
    1. Van Pelt R,
    2. Sillett SC.

    2008. Crown development of coastal Pseudotsuga menziesii, including a conceptual model for tall conifers. Ecological Monographs. 78(2):283–311. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0158.1

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Van Pelt R,
    2. Sillett SC,
    3. Nadkarni NM.

    2004. Quantifying and visualizing canopy structure in tall forests: Methods and a case study. In: Lowman MD, Pinker HB, editors. Forest canopies. 2nd Ed. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press, Elsevier. p. 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012457553-0/50007-1
26. ↵
    1. Wiatrowski WJ.

    2005. Fatalities in the ornamental shrub and tree services industry. Washington (DC, USA): Bureau of Labor Statistics. 7 p. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/cwc/fatalities-in-the-ornamental-shrub-and-tree-services-industry.pdf