Evaluation of Heat Tolerance in Foliar Tissue of Acer Genotypes

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   1. Aguilera C,
   2. Stirling CM,
   3. Long SP.

   1997. Genotypic variation within Zea mays for susceptibility to and rate of recovery from chill-induced photoinhibition of photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum. 106(4):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106411.x

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Allakhverdiev SI,
   2. Kreslavski VD,
   3. Klimov VV,
   4. Los DA,
   5. Carpentier R,
   6. Mohanty P.

   2008. Heat stress: An overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research. 98(1-3):541–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-008-9331-0

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Banks JM,
   2. Hirons AD.

   2019. Alternative methods of estimating the water potential at turgor loss point in Acer genotypes. Plant Methods. 15(34):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0410-3

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Banks JM,
   2. Percival GC,
   3. Rose G.

   2019. Variations in seasonal drought tolerance rankings. Trees. 33(4):1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01842-5

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bauerle WL,
   2. Dudley JB,
   3. Grimes LW.

   2003. Genotypic variability in photosynthesis, water use, and light absorption among red and freeman maple cultivars in response to drought stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 128(3):337–342. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.128.3.0337

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Bhattara S,
   2. Harvey JT,
   3. Djidonou D,
   4. Leskovar DI.

   2021. Exploring morpho-physiological variation for heat stress tolerance in tomato. Plants. 10(2):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020347

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Charng YY,
   2. Mitra S,
   3. Yu SJ.

   2023. Maintenance of abiotic stress memory in plants: Lessons learned from heat acclimation. The Plant Cell. 35(1):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac313

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Coumou D,
   2. Robinson A.

   2013. Historic and future increase in the global land area affected by monthly heat extremes. EnvironmentalResearch Letters. 8(3):034018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034018

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Curtis E,
   2. Knight C,
   3. Petrou K,
   4. Leigh A.

   2014. A comparative analysis of photosynthetic recovery from thermal stress: A desert plant case study. Oecologia. 175(4):1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2988-5

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Daas C,
    2. Montpied P,
    3. Hanchi B,
    4. Dreyer E.

    2008. Responses of photosynthesis to high temperatures in oak saplings assessed by chlorophyll-a fluorescence: Inter-specific diversity and temperature-induced plasticity. Annals of Forest Science. 65:304–306. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008002

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. del Blanco IA,
    2. Rajaram S,
    3. Kronstad WE,
    4. Reynolds MP.

    2000. Physiological performance of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived populations. Crop Science. 40(5):1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4051257x

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Diem JE,
    2. Stauber CE,
    3. Rothenberg R.

    2017. Heat in the southeastern United States: Characteristics, trends, and potential health impact. PLoS ONE. 12(5):e0177937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177937

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Dreyer E,
    2. Le Roux X,
    3. Montpied P,
    4. Daudet FA,
    5. Masson F.

    2001. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiology. 21(4):223–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.4.223

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Filewod B,
    2. Thomas SC.

    2014. Impacts of a spring heat wave on canopy processes in a northern hardwood forest. Global Change Biology. 20(2):360–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12354

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Galmes J,
    2. Medrano H,
    3. Flexas J.

    2007. Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytologist. 175(1): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02087.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Ghouil H,
    2. Montpied P,
    3. Epron D,
    4. Ksontini M,
    5. Hanchi B,
    6. Dreyer E.

    2003. Thermal optima of photosynthetic functions and thermostability of photochemistry in cork oak seedlings. Tree Physiology. 23(15):1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.15.1031

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Greaves JA,
    2. Wilson J.M.

    1987. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis—An aid to plant breeders. Biologist. 34:209–214.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Hamerlynck EP,
    2. Knapp AK.

    1994. Leaf-level responses to light and temperature in two co-occurring Quercus (Fagaceae) species: Implications for tree distribution patterns. Forest Ecology Management. 68(2-3):149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90042-6

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Haque MS,
    2. Kjaer KH,
    3. Rosenqvist E,
    4. Sharma DK,
    5. Ottosen CO.

    2014. Heat stress and recovery of photosystem II efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars acclimated to different growth temperatures. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 99:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.017

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Hassan MU,
    2. Chattha MU,
    3. Khan I,
    4. Chattha MB,
    5. Barbanti L,
    6. Aamer M,
    7. Iqbal MM,
    8. Nawaz M,
    9. Mahmood A,
    10. Ali A,
    11. Aslam MT.

    2020. Heat stress in cultivated plants: Nature, impact, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies—A review. Plant Biosystems. 155(2):1–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2020.1727987

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. He C,
    2. Murray F,
    3. Lyons T.

    2000. Monoterpene and isoprene emissions from 15 Eucalyptus species. Atmosphere Environment. 34(4):645–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00219-8

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Húdoková H,
    2. Petrik P,
    3. Petek-Petrik A,
    4. Konôpková A,
    5. Lestianška A,
    6. Střelcová K,
    7. Kmet’ J,
    8. Kurjak D.

    2022. Heat-stress response of photosystem II in five ecologically important tree species of European temperate forests. Biologia. 77(3):671–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00958-9

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Hu S,
    2. Ding Y,
    3. Zhu C.

    2020. Sensitivity and responses of chloroplasts to heat stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11:375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00375

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Cambridge (United Kingdom) and New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press. 1535 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
25. ↵
    1. Kitao M,
    2. Lei TT,
    3. Koike T.

    1998. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence to evaluate Mn tolerance of deciduous broad-leaved tree seedlings native to northern Japan. Tree Physiology. 18(2):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.2.135

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Kleist E,
    2. Mentel TF,
    3. Andres S,
    4. Bohne A,
    5. Folkers A,
    6. Kiendler-Scharr A,
    7. Rudich Y,
    8. Springer M,
    9. Tillmann R,
    10. Wildt J.

    2012. Irreversible impacts of heat on the emissions of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, phenolic BVOC and green leaf volatiles from several tree species. Biogeosciences. 9(12):5111–5123. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5111-2012

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    1. Knight CA,
    2. Ackerly DD.

    2002. An ecological and evolutionary analysis of photosynthetic thermotolerance using the temperature-dependent increase in fluorescence. Oecologia. 130(4):505–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-001-0841-0

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Knight CA,
    2. Ackerly DD.

    2003. Evolution and plasticity of photosynthetic thermal tolerance, specific leaf area and leaf size: Congeneric species from desert and coastal environments. New Phytologist. 160(2):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00880.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Lahr EC,
    2. Dunn RR,
    3. Frank SD.

    2018. Variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance among red maple (Acer rubrum) urban planted cultivars and wildtype trees in the southeastern United States. PLoSOne. 35(5):e0197866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197866

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lichtenthaler HK,
    2. Wellburn AR.

    1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions. 11(5):591–593. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Huang B.

    2000. Heat stress injury in relation to membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass. Crop Science. 40(2): 503–510. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402503x

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Maxwell K,
    2. Johnson GN.

    2001. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany. 51(345): 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. O’Sullivan OS,
    2. Heskel MA,
    3. Reich PB,
    4. Tjoelker MG,
    5. Weeras-inghe LK,
    6. Penillard A,
    7. Zhu L,
    8. Egerton JJG,
    9. Bloomfield KJ,
    10. Creek D,
    11. Bahar NHA,
    12. Griffin KL,
    13. Hurry V,
    14. Meir P,
    15. Turnbull MH,
    16. Atkin OK.

    2017. Thermal limits of leaf metabolism across biomes. Global Change Biology. 23(1):209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13477

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Graham S.

    2021. Evaluation of inducing agents and synthetic fungicide combinations for management of foliar pathogens of urban trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 47(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2021.008

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Percival CD.

    2022. When selecting trees for heat tolerance keep a cool mind. ARB Magazine. 197:41–45. https://www.trees.org.uk/Membership/ARB-Magazine

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Raupp MJ,
    2. Buckelew Cumming A,
    3. Raupp EC.

    2006. Street tree diversity in Eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 32(6): 297–304. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.038

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Reynolds MP,
    2. Saint Pierre C,
    3. Saad Abu SI,
    4. Vargas M,
    5. Condon AG.

    2007. Evaluating potential genetic gains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive trait expression in elite genetic resources under drought and heat stress. Crop Science. 47(S3): S172–S189. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022IPBS

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Rosyara UR,
    2. Subedi S,
    3. Duveiller E,
    4. Sharma RC.

    2010. Photochemical efficiency and SPAD value as indirect selection criteria for combined selection of spot blotch and terminal heat stress in wheat. Journal Phytopathology. 158(11-12):813–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01703.x

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Sairam RK,
    2. Tyagi A.

    2004. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current Science. 86(3): 407–421. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24108735

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Santamour FS.

    1990. Trees for urban planting: Diversity, uniformity, and common sense. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance (METRIA). METRIA 7: Trees for the Nineties; 1990 June 11-12; Lisle, Illinois, United States. Minneapolis (MN, USA): University of Minnesota. p. 57–65.
41. ↵
    1. Teskey R,
    2. Wertin T,
    3. Bauweraerts I,
    4. Ameye M,
    5. McGuire MA,
    6. Steppe K.

    2015. Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant Cell Environment. 38(9):1699–1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12417

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
42. ↵
    1. Tian F,
    2. Hu XL,
    3. Yao T,
    4. Yang X,
    5. Chen JG,
    6. Lu MZ,
    7. Zhang J.

    2021. Recent advances in the roles of HSFs and HSPs in heat stress response in woody plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12:704905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.704905

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. ↵
    1. Uddling J,
    2. Gelang-Alfredsson J,
    3. Piikki K,
    4. Pleije H.

    2007. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynthesis Research. 91:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Vose RS,
    2. Easterling DR,
    3. Kunkel KE,
    4. LeGrande AN,
    5. Wehner MF.

    2017. Temperature changes in the United States. In: Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK, editors. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I. Washington DC (USA): US Global Change Research Program. p. 185–206. https://doi.org/10.7930/J0N29V45
45. ↵
    1. Wahid A,
    2. Gelani S,
    3. Ashraf M,
    4. Foolad MR.

    2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 61(3):199–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Huang B.

    2004. Physiological recovery of Kentucky Bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress. Crop Science. 44(5):1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1729

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Willits DH,
    2. Peet MM.

    1999. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to model leaf photosynthesis in greenhouse pepper and tomato. ActaHorticulturae. 507:311–315. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.507.36

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Zhu L,
    2. Bloomfield KJ,
    3. Hocart CH,
    4. Egerton JJG,
    5. O’Sullivan OS,
    6. Penillard A,
    7. Weerasinghe LK,
    8. Atkin OK.

    2018. Plasticity of photosynthetic heat tolerance in plants adapted to thermally contrasting biomes. Plant Cell Environment. 41(6):1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13133

    OpenUrl