Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Development of Improved Tree-Trimming Equipment and Techniques

Dennis E. Holewinski, James W. Orr and James P. Gillon
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1983, 9 (5) 137-140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1983.033
Dennis E. Holewinski
Manager, Project Manager and Mechanical, Design Engineer, respectively, Asplundh Environmental Services, Blair Mill Road, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Orr
Manager, Project Manager and Mechanical, Design Engineer, respectively, Asplundh Environmental Services, Blair Mill Road, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
James P. Gillon
Manager, Project Manager and Mechanical, Design Engineer, respectively, Asplundh Environmental Services, Blair Mill Road, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Electric utilities must maintain adequate clearance of overhead circuits to prevent interruptions to their customers’ service. Uncontrolled tree growth commonly causes service interruption by contacting energized conductors and creating momentary faults, complete outages, or mechanical breakage of utility facilities.

The overall objective of the EPRI Project “. . .is to design and produce prototype equipment capable of lowering costs and improving efficiency, safety, and flexibility of line clearance treetrimming operations.” The scope of the project is limited to positioning and cutting equipment and does not include removal of debris.

Tree/wire Relationships

Listen

Ideally, trees are trimmed back from electric conductors to allow them to grow 2 to 4 years before they again become hazardous to the line. Trees are either top, side, overhang (under), or through trimmed according to their relationship to overhead conductors and their potential for interference (Figures 1 and 2). Basic trimming methods include: pollarding, shearing or rounding over, and natural trimming (Figures 2 and 3). Because of long-term line clearance limitations, pollarding and rounding over are undesirable methods. Natural trimming is the method recommended by most professionals.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Tree/wire relationships

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Natural trimming methods

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Undesirable trimming methods

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1 Economic summary

Natural Trimming

Listen

Natural trimming consists of cutting potentially interfering branches flush to a suitable parent limb toward the center of the tree crown. This method is sometimes called “drop crotch” or “lateral” trimming. Generally, cuts are made with a saw and minimal pole pruner work is required. The result is a natural looking tree. Natural trimming is also directional trimming, since it guides growth of the tree away from the wires.

Crew Types

Listen

Utility lines located along streets and highways are maintained most economically by treetrimming crews working from vehicle-mounted aerial devices. Utility lines traversing areas inaccessible to vehicles are normally maintained by manual crews using climbing ropes and belts. Selection of the type of line clearance crew to be used in a given area depends on a combination of factors. The number of men and type of equipment assigned to a crew is determined after evaluating such variables as:

  • Location of utility lines — roadside, rearlot, or cross country

  • Tree type, growth rate, wood strength, branching habit

  • Tree conditions

  • Terrain

  • Climate

  • Labor poor — availability, cost, experience

  • Urban or rural utility system

  • Customer expectation

  • Budget considerations

A national survey shows that 56 percent of all tree-trimming crews are lift crews; 44 percent are manual crews. The most common crew types are 2- or 3-man lift crews (44 percent) and 3- or 4-man manual crews (27 percent). It is important to note that, while nationally 56 percent of the tree-trimming crews have been mechanized with lift trucks, 44 percent of the crews are operating essentially as they did 40 years ago. Improvements and innovations to line clearance tools for manual crews have been minimal since the 1940’s.

Trimming Tools

Listen

A survey of tree trimming contractors and utilities was made to determine how tools and equipment used by line clearance crews may be improved. The most frequent requests were for:

  • Lighter tools

  • More reliable and maintenance-free tools

  • Less expensive tools

These suggestions present conflicting requirements. This establishes the need for careful value engineering analysis of the long-term economics of changing tools that have been used, refined, and improved over many years.

New Concept Analysis

Listen

The Scientific Method, which provides guidance to define the problem, gather relevant data, formulate concepts from the data, and empirically test the concepts, was used to identify new concepts for tree trimming tools and equipment. The problem, tree trimming for line clearance, was defined by using a work measurement system that identified the day’s total activity and the operations required. The lack of repetition in operations makes defining the task of tree trimming more difficult than defining assembly line work. The cutting and positioning requirements of tree trimming contain natural elements that continually change. Data were collected by a literature review, a patent search, and a study of work situations. New concepts were developed from creativity workshops and review of data gathered. These concepts were subjected to an initial screening process to separate those with potential from those with little or no potential for success. Concepts were then subjected to a decision analysis which tested each concept for its practical contribution to program objectives. Only nine, of more than 40 ideas for new tools and equipment that merited screening, were worthy of complete analysis.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Listen

After the decision analysis and study of adverse consequences, five concepts emerged (Figure 4) as potential improvements on line clearance equipment:

  • Pantograph-Type Linkage — support for powered pole saws and pruners.

  • Mobile Platform Lift — similar to those used in the orchard industry.

  • Boom-Mounted Tool — replacement of the bucket on existing lift trucks.

  • Servo-Assisted Pole Saw — for trimming from the ground in backlot locations.

  • Cut/Bundle/Chip Vehicle — mechanized vehicle for continuous operations of tree trimming.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

New tree-trimming concepts

The estimated development cost, benefit/cost ratio, and savings to an average size utility for these concepts are shown below.

The pantograph concept, in conjunction with higher horsepower pole tools, is recommended for short-term development. The adaptation of this concept to existing lift trucks insures a high probability of success.

An engineering study should precede development of other recommended concepts to substantiate their benefits to utilities throughout the United States.

There are unknowns in all development programs such as market demand, operating costs, and actual productivity of the concept after development. Regardless of the unknowns, the economic analysis supports the belief that the development of equipment for tree trimming has the potential for high return on investment.

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵1 Presented at the annual conference of the International Society of Arboriculture in Louisville, Kentucky in August 1982.

  • © 1983, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 9, Issue 5
May 1983
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of Improved Tree-Trimming Equipment and Techniques
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Development of Improved Tree-Trimming Equipment and Techniques
Dennis E. Holewinski, James W. Orr, James P. Gillon
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1983, 9 (5) 137-140; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1983.033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Development of Improved Tree-Trimming Equipment and Techniques
Dennis E. Holewinski, James W. Orr, James P. Gillon
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1983, 9 (5) 137-140; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1983.033
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Tree/wire Relationships
    • Natural Trimming
    • Crew Types
    • Trimming Tools
    • New Concept Analysis
    • Conclusions and Recommendations
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire