Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Response Of Woody Landscape Plants to Bermudagrass Competition and Fertility

Carl E. Whitcomb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1981, 7 (7) 191-194; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1981.047
Carl E. Whitcomb
Department of Horticulture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listen

Four species of woody plants were grown at 3 fertilizer levels in an established bermudagrass sod with 3 sizes of areas free of bermudagrass around the plants. By the end of the second growing season, all woody species were much larger when bermudagrass was kept away from the base of the plants. There was no difference in plant response between the sizes of the 2 cleared areas except the visual grade of holly and privet. Keeping a cleared area free of bermudagrass around newly planted trees and shrubs greatly increases growth.

The landscape environment is not well understood (4, 5, 6). In contrast with classical agriculture where large areas of a single crop are grown, the man managed landscape is a consortium of woody plants, generally unpruned or lightly pruned, growing in a grass sod that is frequently and severely pruned. In the southern states the warm season grasses are best characterized as being very aggressive with strong stolon development in full sun despite the severe pruning. Bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon, centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides, St. Augustine grass, Stenotaphrum secundatum, and Bahiagrass, Paspalum notatum, were studied by Dean, Joiner, and Whitcomb (3) with regard to their effect on pyracantha, Pyracantha coccinea, Hetzi Chinese juniper, Juniperus chinensis ‘Hetzi’, green pittosporum, Pittosporum tobira, and lantana, Lantana camara. They found that bermudagrass had by far the greatest suppressing effect of the woody plants with centipede and bahiagrass intermediate and St. Augustine having the least effect.

Harris (2) observed a restriction in stem diameter and height of Magnolia grandiflora and Zelkova serrata when grown in an established turf of fall fescue, Festuca arundinacea. Whitcomb (7) noted that silver maple, Acer saccharinum, roots were not present in the upper ½ inch of soil following seeding of Kentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis. He could not explain why the tree roots grew at the very surface of the soil where the bluegrass was absent but were eliminated when the grass was present. Richardson (1) reported that perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne, depressed root growth rate, shortened the period of actual growth, reduced the density of root hairs and restricted both rooting depth and lateral spread of roots of sycamore maple, Acer pseudoplatanus. He concluded that competition of the ryegrass for nitrogen was a major factor in the restricted growth of the maple trees. Messenger (8) reviewed the literature in this area and concluded that the shallow, lateral roots of trees are forced to compete for essential substances, especially nitrogen and that all parts of the trees may be adversely affected.

Bermudagrass is one of the most severe competitors of all lawn grasses (3). Since bermudagrass is the dominant lawn grass in the southern states and most new landscape plantings are placed into an established sod, studies of this nature should aid in advising individuals what, if anything, can be done to aid the woody plant.

Methods

Listen

A dense sod of U-3 bermudagrass was established on a moderately fertile clay loam soil. Woody plants were planted in the sod using 3 clearing and 3 fertility treatments in a 3 × 3 factorial set of treatment combinations with 5 replications. Cleared areas were maintained by using Roundup (glyphosate) at 4 tbsp./gal. of water as a spray during the growing season.

Clearing treatments:

  1. A 60 inch square around the plant was kept free of grasses and weeds.

  2. A 30 inch square around the plant was kept free of grasses and weeds.

  3. No clearing, bermudagrass was allowing to grow up to the stem of the plant following planting.

Fertility treatments:

  1. Base fertility only, approximately 1 Ib. N/1000 sq. ft. was applied twice during growing season broadcast over entire area.

  2. An additional two lbs. N/1000 sq. ft. applied spring and fall to an area 5’ × 5’ square around the plants.

  3. An additional four lbs. N/1000 sq. ft. applied spring and fall to an area 5’ × 5’ square around the plants.

During October, 1976, uniform one gallon container stock of the following species were planted: Ilex cornuta, ‘Burford Nana’, dwarf Burford holly; Juniperus chinensis, ‘Hetzi’, Hetzi Chinese juniper and Pinus thunbergi, Japanese black pine. Ligustrum vicaryi, golden vicary privet was planted during June, 1977.

Results

Listen

Only slight differences in plant response to reducing the bermudagrass competition could be seen during the first spring and summer. However, by the end of the 1977 growing season the rapidly growing vicary privet had 100% increase in the number of branches per plant with either clearing area as compared to no clearing (Fig. 1). Plants were only slightly larger where extra fertilizer had been applied and all plants were about the same height.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Size of ligustrum with additional fertilizer and 60″ clearing (lower left), additional fertilizer and 30″ clearing (lower right), no additional fertilizer and 30″ clearing (upper left) and no additional fertilizer and no clearing (upper right) as of August, 1978.

On July 19, 1978, dwarf Burford holly were given a visual grade rating from 1 (poorest) to 10 (best). The high fertilizer treatment and the 60 inch square area free of bermudagrass around each plant averaged 7.6 whereas the high fertilizer and 30 inch square averaged 6.6. Plants with no clearing of bermudagrass averaged 1.3 regardless of the fertilizer treatment.

Japanese black pine had 11 % greater stem caliper, 7% greater height and 31% greater branch number where bermudagrass was kept away from the young trees compared to no clearing (Fig. 2). Increasing fertilizer from the maintenance level for the bermudagrass to the high rate increased height 10%, caliper 11 %, but had no effect on number of branches.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Growth of Japanese Black Pine with additional fertilizer and 60″ clearing (left) and with no additional fertilizer and no clearing (right).

Pfitzer junipers were 33% larger with 38% more branches where either clearing was maintained. Fertilizer only slightly increased juniper growth, with or without the bermudagrass competition.

All four species responded to removal of bermudagrass from around the plants (Table 1). These results are similar to those reported by Dean, et al. (3). Applying additional fertilizer around the plants did not increase the ability of the tree or shrub to compete with the bermudagrass where no clearing was provided. This is in contrast to work by Harris (2) who found that nitrogen fertilization was effective in increasing growth of magnolia trees which had fescue sod growing to their trunks. Richardson (1) also felt that competition for nitrogen was a major factor in the detrimental effect of ryegrass on sycamore maple. Whitcomb (7) speculated that allelopathy (the production of a chemical compound by one plant which is toxic to another plant) may be involved in some tree-turf relationships. Since additional fertilizer did not assist the woody plants when the bermudagrass was present and during the study moisture stress was never severe, allelopathy may be involved. The subtle but certain restriction of growth of woody plants by bermudagrass, even though the grass is severely and frequently pruned, encourages such a hypothesis. There appears to be little advantage to 60″ over 30″ cleared areas except with the privet and holly. This was probably due to the more drought sensitive nature of the holly and extremely vigorous growth of the privet. However, as the trees and shrubs grow larger and roots progress laterally, the larger cleared areas may prove beneficial.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effects of maintaining a bermudagrass free area around landscape plants on plant growth and visual quality.

Keeping a cleared area free of bermudagrass at least 30″ square appears to be one additional way to aid the establishment and growth of newly planted trees and shrubs. Under stress conditions, removal of competition may make the difference between survival and death of some plants.

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵1 Journal series #3849 of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • © 1981, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

Listen
  1. 1.↵
    1. Richardson, S.D.
    1953. Root Growth of Acer pseudo-platanus L. in relation to grass cover and nitrogen deficiency. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschaol te Wageningen, Nederland 53(4):75-97.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Harris, R.W.
    1966. Influence of turfgrass on young land-scape trees. Proc. Int. Hort. Cong. 17:80.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dean, Stanley G.,
    2. J.N. Joiner and
    3. C.E. Whitcomb
    . 1970. Effects of four warm season turfgrasses on growth and development of four shrub species maintained at three levels of competition. HortScience 5:336.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Whitcomb, Carl E.
    1971. Maximizing tree growth. Horticulture 69:44, 45, 52.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Whitcomb, Carl E.
    1971. Speeding up slow growing trees. The Golf Superintendent 39:20-22.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Whitcomb, Carl E.
    1973. Establishing trees and turfgrass together. The Golf Superintendent 41:28-29.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Whitcomb, Carl E.
    1973. Competition between established tree roots and newly seeded Kentucky bluegrass. Agronomy Journal 65:126-129.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Messenger, A.S.
    1976. Root Competition: grass effects on trees. J. Arboric. 2(12):228-230.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 7, Issue 7
July 1981
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response Of Woody Landscape Plants to Bermudagrass Competition and Fertility
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Response Of Woody Landscape Plants to Bermudagrass Competition and Fertility
Carl E. Whitcomb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1981, 7 (7) 191-194; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1981.047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response Of Woody Landscape Plants to Bermudagrass Competition and Fertility
Carl E. Whitcomb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1981, 7 (7) 191-194; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1981.047
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Urban Trees and Cooling: A Review of the Recent Literature (2018 to 2024)
  • Aerial Imagery as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Tree Retention: Applications, Strengths and Challenges for Backyard Tree Planting Programs
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire