Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

The Wounding Effects of Mauget and Creative Sales Injections

Arthur C. Costinis
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) August 1980, 6 (8) 204-208; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1980.050
Arthur C. Costinis
Systemics, Inc., 138 Mill Street, Westwood, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental technique showing placement of treatments on each tree on stem at 4.5’ and at stem/root buttress interface. ICK = Insertion tool control; IT = Insertion tool treatment; DCK = Drill control; DT = Drill treatment.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects of Creative Sales MD nutrient treatment. A. After treatment. MD capsule placed in weak tissue accelerated death and increased injury. B. Onset of treatment. MD capsule in place. C. New wood laid down 18 months after treatment. Approximately 1.5’ of new south wood. D. After treatment. Necrotic tissue (NT) emanating away from capsule of MD fertilizer.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Effects of treatments 18 months later showing the external (A and C) and the internal (B and D) effects of the treatments made by either the Insertion tool (C and D) or the drill (A and B). DCK = Drill control; DT = Drill treatment; ICK = Insertion tool control; IT = Insertion tool treatment.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Wounds in sugar maples following treatment with Mauget technology.

    Treatment1Wound rating3
    Stem injection 4.5’ above Soil Line3 Months18 Months
    Stemix nutrient2
      Drill2.82.8
      Insertion tool5.05.0
    Water control
      Drill2.22.2
      Insertion tool4.04.0
    Stem/root buttress interface
    Stemix Nutrient
      Drill3.23.2
      Insertion tool5.25.2
    Water Control
    Drill1.61.6
    Insertion Tool3.83.8
    • ↵1 Drill wound made with 11/64” diameter bit, 3/8” into xylem. Insertion tool wound made with 3/16” diameter steel rod driven to a depth oí 3’4” into xylem.

    • ↵2 Stemix nutrient contains in a water base (total nitrogen 0.7%, available phosphoric acid 1.0%, soluble potash 0.9%, copper 0.1 %, iron 0.4%, manganese 0.1 % and zinc 0.4%).

    • ↵3 Wounds were rated on a scale of 1 -7. 1 =Lateral death of tissues (LDT) involving pholem, cambium and xylem restricted to the diameter of drill bit or insertion tool. 7 = LDT greater than 20 mm. Average of 5 trees. (5 wounds/treatment. Total 40 wounds)

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Wounds in sugar maples following implants of Medicap MD.

    Treatment1Wound Rating2
    3 Months18 Months
    Implant at stem/root buttress interface
      Experimental “T”4.25.2
      Experimental “T” and
    Medical MD4.45.4
      Medicap MD5.06.0
      Control (Empty Medicap MD Capsule)2.83.8
    • ↵1 Creative Sales implants were made using a 3/8“ diameter drill to a depth of 1.5 “ into the xylem. Medicap MD contains in dry formulation (Total nitrogen 12.0%, available phosphoric acid 4.0%, soluble potash 4.0%, iron 4.0%, manganese 4.0% and zinc 4.0%).

    • ↵2 Wounds were rated on a scale of 1-7. 1 =Lateral death of tissues (LDT) involving pholem, cambium and xylem restricted to the diameter of drill bit or insertion tool. 7 = LDT greater than 20 mm. Average of 5 trees. (5 wounds/treatment. Total 20 wounds)

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 8
August 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Wounding Effects of Mauget and Creative Sales Injections
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
The Wounding Effects of Mauget and Creative Sales Injections
Arthur C. Costinis
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Aug 1980, 6 (8) 204-208; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Wounding Effects of Mauget and Creative Sales Injections
Arthur C. Costinis
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Aug 1980, 6 (8) 204-208; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.050
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS AND MATERIALS
    • Creative Sales Technology
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire