Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Systemic Treatment for Chlorotic Trees

E.B. Himelick and Kirk J. Himelick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1980, 6 (7) 192-196; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1980.047
E.B. Himelick
Plant Pathologist, Illinois Natural History Survey, and Lecturer, Ornamental Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, respectively.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirk J. Himelick
Plant Pathologist, Illinois Natural History Survey, and Lecturer, Ornamental Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, respectively.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    A pin oak showing advanced symptoms of chlorosis, or yellowing, of the foliage. Systemic treatment with an iron compound generally corrects the iron deficiency for about three years.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    A 3 ml plastic syringe with the tip end removed to facilitate loading with powdered ferric citrate.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Response of six tree species on the University of Illinois campus to treatments with ferric citrate powder.

    Tree speciesNumber of treesAverage dbh (inches)Color Rating3
    InitialFinalDifference
    Pin oak1   5   62.27.9    5.7
    Control   3   62.22.8    0.8
    Pin oak2   8165.26.9    1.7
    Control10153.83.6— 0.2
    Bald cypress2   5184.37.7    3.4
    Control   3243.03.7    0.7
    Red oak2   385.27.3    2.1
    Control   2107.07.0    0.0
    Swamp white oak215   66.67.0    0.4
    Control13   67.16.1— 1.0
    Sweet gum2   7106.58.4    1.9
    Control   4176.06.3    0.3
    American sycamore2   2125.06.3    1.3
    Control   3156.07.0    1.0
    • ↵1 Treated July 24, 19 74; color rating taken at end of two growing seasons (early September, 19 75).

    • ↵2 Treated June 1 7-19, 1975; color rating taken at end of first growing season (early September, 1975).

    • 3 Color code: 1-6, shades of yellow; 7-10, shades of green; 10, dark green.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Treatment of chlorotic pin oak in 1977.

    TreatmentNumber of treesColor rating1Twing growth (inches) 1978
    May 1977July 1977July 1978July 1979
    Ferric citrate2324.57.47.76.56.8
    Ferric ammonium citrate3145.37.17.16.46.9
    Ferric ammonium citrate + NPK4144.67.07.17.26.6
    Ferric ammonium citrate + N5104.65.95.75.35.7
    NPK6106.26.67.16.64.6
    NPK + slow-release N7   65.25.86.65.44.8
    N (slow-release)7116.06.16.25.94.3
    Control125.76.36.35.84.3
    • Average tree size: 13.2 in dbh (range 4-24 in).

    • ↵1 Color code: 1-6, shades of yellow: 7-10, shades of green; 10, dark green.

    • ↵2 Purified powder form, 1 ½ g/ho)e, holes 4 in (10 cm) apart.

    • ↵3 Medicap Fe28, size 0, 3/8 in (1.1 cm), trees 4-11 in (10-28 cm) dbh; size 000,0.5 in (1.27 cm) in larger trees.

    • ↵4 Medícap formulation of Fe + soluble NPK, size 000 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 11/16 in (2.1 cm) in larger trees.

    • ↵5 Medicap formulation of Fe28 and slow-release N, size 0 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • ↵6 Medicap formulation with soluble NPK alone, size 0 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • ↵7 Medicap formulation with slow-release N only, size 0 used in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • 8 Medicap formulation of slow-release N, size 000 used in trees 4-11 in dbh and 11/16 in cartridge in larger trees.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Treatment of chlorotic sweet gum in 1977.

    TreatmentNumber of treesColor rating1Twig growth (inches) 1978
    May 1977July 1977July 1978July 1979
    Ferric citrate2116.38.78.37.49.0
    Ferric ammonium citrate3106.18.18.07.18.6
    Ferric ammonium citrate + NPK4106.78.38.07.87.8
    Ferric ammonium citrate + N5106.38.17.96.77.1
    NPK6106.68.38.17.36.4
    NPK + slow-release N7   66.58.17.87.06.0
    N (slow-release)7   95.77.16.86.65.5
    Control116.47.67.76.65.2
    • Average tree size: 12.0 in dbh (range 5-33 in).

    • ↵1 Colorcode: 1-6, shades of yellow; 7-10, shades of green; 10, dark green.

    • ↵2 Purified powder form, 1¼ g/hole, holes 4 in (10 cm) apart.

    • ↵Medicap Fe28, size 0, 3/8 in (1.1 cm), trees 4-11 in (10-28 cm) dbh; size 000, 0.5 in (1.27 cm) in larger trees.

    • ↵4 Medícap formulation of Fe + soluble NPK, size 000 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 11/16 in (2.1 cm) in larger trees.

    • ↵Medicap formulation of Fe28 and slow-release N, size 0 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • ↵5 Medicap formulation with soluble NPK alone, size 0 in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • ↵7 Medicap formulation with slow-release N only, size 0 used in trees 4-11 in dbh and size 000 in larger trees.

    • 8 Medicap formulation of slow-release N, size 000 used in trees 4-11 in dbh and 11/16 in cartridge in larger trees.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Treatment of chlorotic white oak in 1978.

    TreatmentNumber of treesColor ratingColor increase
    6/788/788/791st year2nd year
    Ferric ammonium citrate265.46.16.40.71.0
    Manganese sulfate75.66.26.40.50.8
    Control103.94.04.80.10.9
    • Average tree size: 20.8 in dbh (range 14-30 in).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 7
July 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systemic Treatment for Chlorotic Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Systemic Treatment for Chlorotic Trees
E.B. Himelick, Kirk J. Himelick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1980, 6 (7) 192-196; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Systemic Treatment for Chlorotic Trees
E.B. Himelick, Kirk J. Himelick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1980, 6 (7) 192-196; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.047
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • University of Illinois Campus
    • City of Urbana, Illinois
    • City of Highland Park, Illinois
    • Discussion and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire