Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Street Tree Policies in Ohio Towns

Barbara C. Hager, William N. Cannon, Jr and David P. Worley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1980, 6 (7) 185-191; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1980.046
Barbara C. Hager
USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Delaware, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
William N. Cannon Jr
USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Delaware, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
David P. Worley
USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Delaware, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Street trees in an older residential neighborhood. Trees such as these were the basis of our assessment of municipal tree-care practices.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Size distribution of trees in Ohio residential areas over 40 years old.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    A silver maple street tree with several dead or dying branches. A large portion of the crown was broken off during a storm.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Number and percentage of towns that meet the performance criteria for street-tree situations, by tree-care program.

    Street tree situation elementsaEstablished programbNew or no programc
    NumberPercentNumberPercent
    Kinds of trees125110
    Tree condition
      10”-16” dbhd3750  0
      16” dbh and above250110
    Abundance375330
    Size distribution375220
    Point Score
      1125550
      20  0110
      3125 0 0
      4250 0 0
    • ↵a These elements are defined in the text.

    • ↵b The four towns with established programs budgeted an average of $11,000 annually for tree care.

    • ↵c Ten towns with new or no programs were sampled. Their annual budget for tree care averaged $4,350.

    • ↵d Diameter at breast height, 1 inch = 2.5 cm.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Trees less than 10 inches dbh as a percentage of the street tree population in selected Ohio towns in 1977, by kind of tree and tree-care program.

    SpeciesEstablished programNew or no program
    Hard maplea26.433.6
    Soft mapleb25.630.4
    Sycamore  0.010.8
    Honeylocust18.8  3.5
    Crabapple  8.7  3.3
    Basswood  7.5  2.6
    Hawthorn  2.4  0.2
    Mountainash  2.4  0.9
    Ash  1.9  3.8
    Orn. cherry  1.6  1.0
    Dogwood  1.6  0.7
    Sweetgum  1.2  1.6
    Redbud  0.8  0.2
    Boxelder  0.8  0.9
    Poplar  0.4  0.0
    Callery pear  0.4  0.0
    Buckeye  0.4  0.0
    Tuliptree  0.0  0.2
    Ginko  0.0  0.2
    Birch  0.0  0.2
    Catalpa  0.0  0.5
    Oak  0.0  0.9
    Conifer sp.  0.0  1.6
    Elm  0.0  1.6
    • ↵a Sugar, black, and Norway maple.

    • ↵b Red and silver maples and their hybrids.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Percentage of trees in each condition class in residential areas over 40 years old in selected Ohio towns in 1977, by tree size and tree-care program.

    Tree-care programConditionclass
    ExcellentGoodFairPoor
    Less than 4” dbha
    Established96.61.51.20.7
    New or none93.42.11.92.6
    5”-10” dbh
    Established79.814.84.21.2
    New or none73.917.16.72.3
    11”-16” dbh
    Established62.127.68.61.7
    New or none48.523.021.07.5
    Greater than 16” dbh
    Esablished38.130.023.18.8
    New or none27.830.529.712.0
    • ↵a Diameter at breast height, 1 inch = 2.5 cm.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 7
July 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Street Tree Policies in Ohio Towns
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Street Tree Policies in Ohio Towns
Barbara C. Hager, William N. Cannon, David P. Worley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1980, 6 (7) 185-191; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Street Tree Policies in Ohio Towns
Barbara C. Hager, William N. Cannon, David P. Worley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1980, 6 (7) 185-191; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.046
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • City Policies and Shade Tree Programs
    • Street-Tree Evaluation
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire