Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Amelioration of Salt Damage to Cotoneaster By Gypsum

Michael A. Dirr and JoAnn Biedermann
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1980, 6 (4) 108-110; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1980.029
Michael A. Dirr
Associate Professor and Research Technician, Department of Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
JoAnn Biedermann
Associate Professor and Research Technician, Department of Horticulture, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cotoneasters were grown in a gypsum-treated medium and salinized with 0.15N/NaCI. Gypsum was applied in 3 forms with 2 application methods and at 2 rates. Controls received no gypsum additions. Control plants were severely injured, while gypsum treated plants showed reduced damage. The incorporated gypsum was more effective in alleviating damage than surface applications. Rate was not a factor as 20 lb/100 sq. ft. proved as effective as 40 lb/100 sq. ft. All 3 gypsum formulations were effective but the granular materials were easier to work with when compared to the fine-ground. Electrical conductivity of the media leachates were significantly lower in incorporated gypsum treatments compared to the control. The pH of the leachates was not affected by gypsum treatments.

Salt damage to vegetation along highways, sidewalks and in containers has been well documented (3,5,9,10). Injury (2,5,10) results from aerial and soil-deposited salts. Plants in tree lawns, parkways, planters or close to roadways are more apt to be injured by soil salts (3,9). Damage to containerized plant materials is often accentuated because salt-laden snow is piled around the containers and tree lawn areas. Gypsum has been shown to reduce Na uptake by plants (1) and, possibly Cl (6), and is recommended as an ameliorative treatment for reducing salt injury to Acer saccharum, sugar maple, in New England (9). The possible beneficial effects of gypsum on the alleviation of the soil salt damage to containerized plants have not been critically examined. This study determined the ameliorative effects of 3 gypsum sources, 2 application methods, and 2 rates on the appearance of Skogsholm cotoneaster, and the media electrical conductivity and pH.

Materials and Methods

Healthy, vigorous rooted cotoneaster cuttings were transplanted into 15cm plastic pots containing a soil:peat:perlite (1:1:1) medium or a gypsum-amended medium of the same composition. Three gypsum sources were used: United States Gypsum Granular; Sof’n-Soil Lawn and Garden (granular); and Sof’n-Soil Lawn and Garden (fine). These sources were incorporated or surface applied at rates of 20 and 40 lb/100 sq. ft. (17.6 g/pot=20 lb rate or 35.3 g/pot=40 lb rate). The surface treatment was applied after transplanting, while the incorporated gypsum was mixed with the media and the plants potted thereafter. Control consisted of the medium without gypsum.

Plants were pruned to a uniform height and placed in the greenhouse under 15-hour photoperiods at 24° day/20°C night temperatures. Plants were fertilized for 8 weeks with Hoagland’s No. 1 solution (4) at a rate of 200 ml/container on alternate days. Leachates were collected weekly from each container and pH and electrical conductivity were determined. When no significant pH or conductivity changes were evident, the leachates were collected at 2 week intervals thereafter. Only initial and final values are presented.

Salt treatments were initiated in the ninth week. Each container was supplied with 200 ml of 0.15N NaCI on alternate days and with a Hoagland’s or deionized water treatment the other days. The experiment was terminated after 4 weeks when the majority of the control plants showed 70 to 80 percent or greater necrosis. Plants were evaluated using a rating index (See Table 1 for criteria). Plants were arranged in a completely randomized design with 5 single plant replicates per treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effect of gypsum sources, application methods, and rates on the appearance of Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Skogsholmen’ and on the initial and final leachate electrical conductivities and pH values.

Results and Discussion

Gypsum ameliorated the salt damage on cotoneaster in all treatments except the Sof’n-Soil (fine) surface applications (Table 1). Control plants were approximately 70 to 80 percent necrotic while plants grown with the 3 incorporated gypsum sources at the 2 rates were less than 40 percent necrotic. A high rate of soil salt application was used in this study to produce toxicity symptoms. Under normal conditions container-grown plants would not be exposed to these quantities and the ameliorative effect of gypsum would possibly be greater.

The incorporated gypsum proved more effective than surface applications. The use of gypsum on established plants in tree lawns and containers, however, would probably necessitate surface applications. Three gypsum applications methods used in Maine experiments were most effective in the following order: surface, subsurface, and subsurface combined with mechanical soil aeration (9). Drill hole application would work but the cost might preclude this method. In new plantings the gypsum could be easily mixed with the backfill.

Both rates appeared to be effective. The 20 and 40 lb./100 sq. ft. translate into 4.36 and 8.72 tons/acre, respectively. Rates of gypsum application required to achieve soil salts reduction varies from 4 to 15 tons/acre (9). Plice (7) reported that 4 to 6 tons/acre reclaimed strongly saline soils, and that 12 tons/acre offered the advantage of reducing salts more quickly. Gypsum treatments are effective over a long time period and annual or biennial treatments are not necessary.

The electrical conductivities (measure of total ions in solution) were significantly lower in all incorporated gypsum treatments than in the controls. Surface applications of Sof’n-Soil (granular) at 40 lb and Sof’n-Soil (fine) at both rates also resulted in lower conductivities. The plants grew better in the soils with lower salt content. This is to be expected in view of the reported effects of high soil salts on plant growth (8). Although tissue analysis was not completed, it is logical to assume that levels of Na and Cl were lower in plants grown with gypsum. Ayoub (1) reported a 30 to 85 percent reduction in leaf Na from plants grown in saline soils treated with gypsum. Jacobs (6) showed that gypsum applications resulted in greater soil Cl reductions than those of controls (non-gypsum). Both Na and Cl ions have been implicated in plant salt damage (2,5,10) and if they are effectively reduced in plant tissue then increased vigor should result.

The pH changes due to gypsum treatments were negligible although there was 0.5 to 0.8 unit change from the initial values to the final. This was due largely to the Hoagland’s solution which is 100% nitrate nitrogen and pH rises with NO3 fertility.

Summary and Conclusions

Gypsum appears to have potential for alleviating soil-salt damage to landscape plants. A broader spectrum of plants must be screened and a more definitive range of gypsum concentrations should be examined. Soil and plant tissue analyses are needed to corroborate the observed beneficial effects. All sources of gypsum, when incorporated, were effective. The Sof’n-Soil (fine) is difficult to work with. The granular forms are recommended.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 The senior author is presently Director, UGA Botanical Garden, Athens, GA 30605.

  • © 1980, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ayoub, A.T.
    1975. Effect of some soil amendments on sodium uptake and translocation in dry beans (P. vulgaris L.) in relation to sodium toxicity. J. Agr. Sci. 84:537-541.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dirr, M.A.
    1975. Effects of salts and application methods on English ivy. HortScience 10:182-184.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dirr, M.A.
    1976. Selection of trees for tolerance to salt injury. J. Arboric. 11:209-216.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hoagland, D.R. and
    2. D.I. Arnon
    . 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hofstra, G. and
    2. R. Hall
    . 1971. Injury on roadside trees: leaf injury on pine and white cedar in relation to foliar levels of sodium and chloride. Can. J. Bot. 49:613-622.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jacobs, K.
    1976. Dispersal of roadways salts. Technical Paper 77-4, Third Interim Report. Maine Dept. Trans., Materials and Res. Div., p. 11.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Plice, M.J.
    1949. Some effects of salt water on soil fertility. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 14:275-278.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Richards, L.A., ed
    . 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Dept. Agr. Handb. 60.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rubens, J.M.
    1978. Soil desalination to counteract maple decline. J. Arboric. 4:33-42.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Westing, A.H.
    1969. Plants and salts in the roadside environment. Phytopathology 59:1174-1181.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 4
April 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Amelioration of Salt Damage to Cotoneaster By Gypsum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Amelioration of Salt Damage to Cotoneaster By Gypsum
Michael A. Dirr, JoAnn Biedermann
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1980, 6 (4) 108-110; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Amelioration of Salt Damage to Cotoneaster By Gypsum
Michael A. Dirr, JoAnn Biedermann
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1980, 6 (4) 108-110; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.029
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Perceived Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Private-Sector Urban and Community Forestry in the Southern United States
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire