Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Branches

Alex L. Shigo
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 1980, 6 (11) 300-304; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1980.073
Alex L. Shigo
Chief Scientist, USDA Forest Service, NE Forest Experiment Station, Durham, New Hampshire
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    When small, young branches on small stems die, the internal portion of the branch that connects with the stem pith is walled off. Even if this Internal portion is infected, the infection does not spread to the stem wood. This is the situation when the tree’s defense system is working perfectly.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The same walling off process occurs when small, young leaders die. Again, even if the leaders are Infected, the infection does not spread to the stem if the defense system is working properly.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    But, when aggressive microorganisms infect small, young dying branches, they may spread into the stem. Even then the tree responds to limit the infection to the wood present at the time the branch died. Decay can start in very young stems.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    A portion of the stem is injured when a branch falls and microorganisms have the advantage.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Dissection of the previous section shows the decay that can develop in 2 years despite the vigorous callus. When many such wounds accumulate on a tree, severe internal injury will result. Many problems that become obvious later in the life of the tree began when the tree was young.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    As trees and branches become larger and older, the same events are repeated. A wide variety of “good” or beneficial microorganisms cause decay in the dying branch back to the tree stem. The decay usually ends at the base of the branch. If the tree’s defense system works properly, this decay will be walled off to a very small volume.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    When aggressive microorganisms infect, or when the tree’s defense system does not work perfectly, infection may occur. The infection is usually walled off to the Inner tissues of the branch. Note also the insect gallery in the decayed stub. This may have been the reason why the decay was not blocked sooner. The major point here is that the decay was walled off to a very small volume and did not spread into the trunk.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    There are times when the microorganisms “win” and Infect the trunk. But, even then, the tree walls off the Infection to those tissues present at the time the branch died.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    There is still one situation that is worse for the tree, when canker-causing microorganisms enter the trunk by way of the dying branch. A seesaw action then begins. The fungus kills a portion of the trunk, and the tree responds by walling off the infection. Then the fungus repeats its infection the next year and the tree responds again. Targetshaped cankers often form.

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Decay-causing fungi may also start cankers after they become established in a trunk. The fungi often produce a wedgelike pressure pad that splits the bark from the outer side of the cambium (arrows). Once the fungus starts this action, the seesaw with the tree begins again: the fungus kills a small portion, the tree responds by walling off the killed portion, and this is repeated until the fungi eventually “win.”

  • Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    The coalescence of many columns of discolored wood associated with the death of many branches often results in a central column of discolored wood that is often mistakenly called heartwood. This red maple does not have a normal central core of colored heartwood. The central colored column here is discolored wood. The diameter of the column was the diameter of the tree when the branches died. Note also that the decayed wood was walled off to the tips of the branch stubs.

  • Fig. 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 12.

    Heartwood also compartmentalizes discolored and decayed wood associated with dead stubs. The decay associated with this stub in black walnut is surrounded by sound, noninfected heartwood.

  • Fig. 13.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 13.

    When decay starts in a dead branch stub, the sapwood (arrows), not the heartwood, decays first.

  • Fig. 14.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 14.

    As a branch begins to wane and die, the trunk wood around the branch grows at the rate of other trunk tissues, but the wood in the dying branch stops growing. As a result, a swollen collar forms at the base of the branch.

  • Fig. 15.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 15.

    The collar is trunk wood, not branch wood.

  • Fig. 16.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 16.

    The collar wood is not infected by the decay in the decayed stub.

  • Fig. 17.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 17.

    When branches are pruned, great care must be taken not to remove the branch collar. Then, even if the branch is infected, the infection will be walled off within the wood present when the branch died (arrows).

  • Fig. 18.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 18.

    If the collar is removed, the trunk wood may become infected. The likelihood of this is increased on slow-growing trees. The arrows show the limits of the discolored wood if the branch had been pruned properly.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 11
November 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Branches
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Branches
Alex L. Shigo
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1980, 6 (11) 300-304; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.073

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Branches
Alex L. Shigo
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1980, 6 (11) 300-304; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1980.073
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire