Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Trunk and Soil Chlorosis Treatments of Pin Oak

Dan Neely
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 1980, 6 (11) 298-299; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1980.6.11.298
Dan Neely
Section of Botany and Plant Pathology, Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois 61801
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

When chlorophyll pigment production is adequate, plant leaves normally are green. When chlorophyll production is inadequate, the yellow pigments in leaves become evident and leaves are called chlorotic. In pin oak, Quercus palustris, chlorosis is most often due to a deficiency or lack of availability of iron in the soil or plant. There is a yellowing of tissues between the leaf veins while the veins remain green. Yellowing is evident on young leaves in the spring, and new foliage formed later in the season becomes increasingly chlorotic. As the disease becomes more severe, leaf necrosis, twig dieback, and tree death occur.

Pin oak chlorosis can be corrected by trunk implant (1, 2) and soil (3) treatments. In this study the intensity of response and the longevity of treatments were compared.

Materials and Methods

The pin oak trees used in this study were in a landscape planting on the grounds of the Morton Arboretum near Lisle, Illinois, 25 miles west of Chicago. The soil had been disturbed during road construction before the trees were planted. The 24 mildly chlorotic trees were randomly divided into three treatment groups. Average trunk diameter 3 feet above the ground line was 6.6 inches with tree heights of 15-20 feet in 1974.

Eight trees were treated June 20-21, 1974 with trunk implants and eight were treated with soil injection. Ferric ammonium citrate (standard Medicaps, 18% Fe, Creative Sales, Fremont, Nebraska) was placed in ½-inch diameter, 13/8-inch deep holes drilled into the trunk every 3 inches around the tree circumference. Chelated iron (Sequestrene Fe 138, CIBA Geigy, Greensboro, North Carolina), 2 lbs/35 gallons water/200 sq ft/tree was injected into soil with a hydraulic pump and a tree feeding needle. Eight trees remained untreated as controls.

On May 3, 1977 the implant-treated trees and the untreated trees received ferric ammonium citrate implants. Eight trees randomly selected from the group were treated with standard Medicaps (18% Fe). Eight trees were treated with smaller Medicaps containing 28% Fe in 3/8-inch diameter, 1 ¼-inch deep holes spaced every 3 inches around the tree circumference. Four additional pin oaks were selected as untreated controls.

Responses to treatment were determined by rating leaf color two or more times during July-September, 1974 through 1978. Rating was on a scale of 1-9; 1-3=necrosis of the leaf blade, 4-6=yellow leaves, 7-9=green leaves. When coloration of the crown was not uniform, two ratings were given to each tree.

Results and Discussion

Trunk implant treatments corrected pin oak chlorosis much faster than did soil treatments. Within 1 month following treatment, implant-treated trees were dark green. Three months were required in 1974 for the soil-treated trees to respond fully. In both treatments, trees that initially were slightly yellow became dark green (Table 1), with the trunk-treated trees somewhat darker the season of treatment. The untreated control trees progressively declined during the season and throughout the test period.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Response of pin oaks at the Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois to trunk and soil treatments to correct lime-induced chlorosis. Eiqht trees per treatment.

Neither treatment permanently corrected the chlorotic condition, but soil treatments were decidedly longer lasting than trunk implants. Soil treatments corrected pin oak chlorosis for 4-5 years while trunk treatments were effective for 2-3 years (Table 1). Variation in tree response was noted. In each season following treatment the tree color observed was successively less green.

In this test the ferric ammonium citrate with 18% Fe gave a better and more persistent correction than did the 28% material. Additional comparisons are needed.

Conclusions from the test were: 1) lime-induced chlorosis of pin oak was corrected with trunk implantation of ferric ammonium citrate or by soil treatment with the properly formulated chelated iron, 2) trunk-implant treatments gave a faster response but soil treatments lasted longer, 3) no plant injury was observed, 4) there was no need for annual treatments, 5) most trunk-implant wounds healed during the season of treatment, and 6) trunk implants must be closely spaced to obtain uniform correction of chlorosis throughout the crown.

  • © 1980, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Neely, Dan
    . 1973. Pin oak chlorosis: trunk implantations correct iron deficiency. J. Forestry 71: 340-342.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Neely, Dan
    . 1976. Iron deficiency chlorosis of shade trees. J. Arboric. 2: 128-130.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schoeneweiss, D.F.
    1973. Correction of lime-induced chlorosis by liquid soil injection. HortScience 8: 333-334.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 6, Issue 11
November 1980
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trunk and Soil Chlorosis Treatments of Pin Oak
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Trunk and Soil Chlorosis Treatments of Pin Oak
Dan Neely
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1980, 6 (11) 298-299; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1980.6.11.298

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Trunk and Soil Chlorosis Treatments of Pin Oak
Dan Neely
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1980, 6 (11) 298-299; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1980.6.11.298
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire