Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction | Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Literature Cited

↵
1. Ackerman A,
2. Crespo A,
3. Auwaerter J,
4. Foulds E,
5. Digit L.
2021. Using tree modeling applications and game design software to simulate tree mortality and community interaction. Journal of Digital Landscape Architect. 6:163–170. https://doi.org/10.14627/537705013
OpenUrl
↵
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Boad (AHDB). 2018. How to count earth worms. Kenilworth (United Kingdom): AHDB. [Accessed 2023 September 18]. https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/how-to-count-earthworms
↵
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Boad (AHDB). 2019. Biological tests for soil health. Kenilworth (United Kingdom): AHDB. [Accessed 2023 September 18]. https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/biological-tests-for-soil-health
↵
1. Ahmed N,
2. Al-Mutairi KA.
2022. Earthworms effect on microbial population and soil fertility as well as their interaction with agriculture practices. Sustainability. 14(13):7803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137803
OpenUrl
↵
1. Awmack CS,
2. Mondor EB,
3. Lindroth RL.
2007. Forest understory clover populations in enriched CO₂ and O₃ atmospheres: Interspecific, intraspecific, and indirect effects. Environmental Experimental Botany. 59(3):340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.04.003
OpenUrl
↵
1. Barré P,
2. McKenzie BM,
3. Hallett PD.
2009. Earthworms bring compacted and loose soil to a similar mechanical state. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 41(3):656–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.015
OpenUrl
↵
1. Bastin JF,
2. Finegold Y,
3. Garcia C,
4. Mollicone D,
5. Rezende M,
6. Routh D,
7. Zohner CM,
8. Crowther TW.
2019. The global tree restoration potential. Science. 365(6448):76–79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Beniston J,
2. Lal R
1. Beniston J,
2. Lal R.
2012. Improving soil quality for urban agriculture in the North Central US. In: Beniston J, Lal R, editors. Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer. p. 279–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2366-5_15
↵
1. Blouin M,
2. Hodson ME,
3. Delgado EA,
4. Baker G,
5. Brussaard L,
6. Butt KR,
7. Dai J,
8. Dendooven L,
9. Peres G,
10. Tondoh JE,
11. Cluzeau D,
12. Brun JJ.
2013. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science. 64(2):161–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12025
OpenUrl
↵
1. Bottinelli N,
2. Henry des Tureaux T,
3. Hallaire V,
4. Mathieu J,
5. Benard Y,
6. Duc Tran T,
7. Jouquet P.
2010. Earthworms accelerate soil porosity turnover under watering conditions. Geoderma. 156(1-2):43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.01.006
OpenUrl GeoRef
↵
1. Brtnicky M,
2. Kintl A,
3. Hammerschmiedt T,
4. Mustafa A,
5. Elbl J,
6. Kucerik J,
7. Vyhnanek T,
8. Skladanka J,
9. Hunady I,
10. Holatko J.
2021. Clover species specific influence on microbial abundance and associated enzyme activities in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils. Agronomy. 11(11):2214. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112214
OpenUrl
↵
1. Butt KR.
2008. Earthworms in soil restoration: Lessons learned from United Kingdom case studies of land reclamation. Restoration Ecology. 16(4):637–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00483.x
OpenUrl
↵
1. Butt KR,
2. Frederickson J,
3. Morris RM.
1995. An earthworm cultivation and soil inoculation technique for land restoration. Ecological Engineering. 4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(93)E0053-S
OpenUrl
↵
1. Capowiez Y,
2. Sammartino S,
3. Cadoux S,
4. Bouchant P,
5. Guy R,
6. Boizard H.
2012. Roles of earthworms in regenerating soil structure after compaction in reduced tillage systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 55:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.013
OpenUrl
↵
1. Castellari S,
2. Zandersen M,
3. Davis M,
4. Veerkamp C,
5. Forster J,
6. Marttunen M,
7. Mysiak J,
8. Vandewalle M,
9. Medri S,
10. Picatoste JR.
2021. Nature-based solutions in Europe: Policy, knowledge and practice for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Environment Agency. No 01/2021. 164 p. https://doi.org/10.2800/919315
↵
1. Chalker-Scott L.
2007. Impact of mulches on landscape plants and the environment—A review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 25(4):239–249. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-25.4.239
OpenUrl
↵
1. Chauhan PR.
2014. Role of earthworms in soil fertility and factors affecting their population dynamics: A review. International Journal of Research. 1(6):642–649. https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/article/view/311
OpenUrl
↵
1. Cimburova Z,
2. Pont MB.
2021. Location matters. A systematic review of spatial contextual factors mediating ecosystem services of urban trees. Ecosystem Services. 50:101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101296
OpenUrl
↵
1. Cong C,
2. Pan H,
3. Page J,
4. Barthel S,
5. Kalantari Z.
2023. Modeling place-based nature-based solutions to promote urban carbon neutrality. Ambio. 52:1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01872-x
OpenUrl
↵
1. Williams MJWM
1. Crush JR.
1987. Nitrogen fixation. In: Williams MJWM, editor. White clover. Wallingford (United Kingdom): CAB International. p. 185–201.
↵
1. Day SD,
2. Bassuk NL.
1994. A review of the effects of soil compaction and amelioration treatments on landscape trees. Journal of Arboriculture. 20(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1994.003
OpenUrl
↵
1. Day SD,
2. Bassuk NL,
3. van Es H.
1995. Effects of four compaction remediation methods for landscape trees on soil aeration, mechanical impedance and tree establishment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 13(2):64–71. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-13.2.64
OpenUrl
↵
1. Day SD,
2. Harris RJ.
2008. Growth, survival, and root system morphology of deeply planted Corylus colurna 7 years after transplanting and the effects of root collar excavation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 7(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.12.004
OpenUrl
↵
1. Day SD,
2. Watson G,
3. Wiseman EP,
4. Harris RJ.
2009. Causes and consequences of deep structural roots in urban trees: From nursery production to landscape establishment. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(4):182–191. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.031
OpenUrl
↵
1. Deguchi S,
2. Shimazaki Y,
3. Uozumi S,
4. Tawaraya K,
5. Kawamoto H,
6. Tanaka O.
2007. White clover living mulch increases the yield of silage corn via arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonization. Plant and Soil. 291:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9194-8
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Elderbrock E,
2. Enright C,
3. Lynch KA,
4. Rempel AR.
2020. A guide to public green space planning for urban ecosystem services. Land. 9(10):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100391
OpenUrl
↵
European Commission. 2015. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities—Final report of the horizon 2020 expert group on nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities (full version). European Commission Publications Office. 76 p. https://doi.org/10.2777/765301
↵
European Commission. 2016. Policy topics: Nature-based solutions. European Commission. [Accessed 2023 September 18]. https://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/index.cfm?pg=nbs
↵
1. Ferreira CSS,
2. Kalantari Z,
3. Hartmann T,
4. Pereira P
1. Ferreira CSS,
2. Potočki K,
3. Kapović-Solomun M,
4. Kalantari Z.
2021. Nature-based solutions for flood mitigation and resilience in urban areas. In: Ferreira CSS, Kalantari Z, Hartmann T, Pereira P editors. Nature-based solutions for flood mitigation: Environmental and socio-economic aspects. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Vol 107. Cham (Switzerland): Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_758
↵
1. Fite K.
2008. Impacts of Root Invigoration and its individual components on the performance of red maple (Acer rubrum) [dissertation]. Clemson (SC, USA): Clemson University. 137 p. https://open.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/260
↵
1. Fite K,
2. Smiley ET,
3. McIntyre J,
4. Wells CE.
2011. Evaluation of a soil decompaction and amendment process for urban trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 37(4):293–300. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2011.038
OpenUrl
↵
1. Gliński J,
2. Lipiec J.
1990. Soil physical conditions and plant roots. 1st Ed. Boca Raton (FL, USA): CRC Press. 260 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351076708
↵
1. Grey V,
2. Livesley SJ,
3. Fletcher TD,
4. Szota C.
2018. Establishing street trees in stormwater control measures can double tree growth when extended waterlogging is avoided. Landscape and Urban Planning. 178:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.06.002
OpenUrl
↵
1. Haruna SI,
2. Anderson SH,
3. Udawatta RP,
4. Clark JG,
5. Phillips NC,
6. Cui S,
7. Gao Y.
2020. Improving soil physical properties through the use of cover crops: A review. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment. 3(1):e20105. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20105
OpenUrl
↵
1. Hascher W,
2. Wells CE.
2007. Effects of soil decompaction and amendment on root growth and architecture in red maple (Acer rubrum). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(6):428–432. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.049
OpenUrl
↵
1. Herron J,
2. Hennessy D,
3. Curran TP,
4. Moloney A,
5. O’Brien D.
2021. The simulated environmental impact of incorporating white clover into pasture-based dairy production systems. Journal of Dairy Science. 104(7):7902–7918. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19077
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Global warming of 1.5 °C. Cambridge (United Kingdom) and New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.001
↵
1. Keeler BL,
2. Hamel P,
3. McPhearson T,
4. Hamann MH,
5. Donahue ML,
6. Prado KAM,
7. Arkema KK,
8. Bratman GN,
9. Brauman KA,
10. Finlay JC,
11. Guerry AD,
12. Hobbie SE,
13. Johnson JA,
14. MacDonald GK,
15. McDonald RI,
16. Neverisky N,
17. Wood SA.
2019. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability. 2(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
OpenUrl
↵
1. Klopp H.
2023. Bulk density is an indicator of soil health. Brookings (SD, USA): South Dakota State University Extension Office. [Updated 2023 September 22; Accessed 2025 February 13]. https://extension.sdstate.edu/bulk-density-indicator-soil-health
↵
1. Kong X,
2. Zhang X,
3. Xu C,
4. Hauer RJ.
2021. Review on urban forests and trees as nature-based solutions over 5 years. Forests. 12(11):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111453
OpenUrl
↵
1. Kuncheva GS.
2015. Comparative study of microbial activity and chemical properties of soil by implementing anti-erosion measure vertical mulching with organic residues. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 63(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010059
OpenUrl
↵
1. Horton CG
1. Le Bayon RC,
2. Bullinger-Weber G,
3. Schomburg A,
4. Turberg P,
5. Schlaepfer R,
6. Guenat C.
2017. Earthworms as ecosystem engineers: A review. In: Horton CG, editor. Earthworms: Types, roles and research. Hauppauge (NY, USA): NOVA Publishers. p. 129–177.
↵
1. López-Díaz ML,
2. Rigueiro-Rodríguez A,
3. Mosquera-Losada MR.
2009. Influence of pasture botanical composition and fertilization treatments on tree growth. Forest Ecology and Management. 257(4):363–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.001
OpenUrl
↵
1. Maréchal J,
2. Hoeffner K,
3. Marié X,
4. Cluzeau D.
2021. Response of earthworm communities to soil engineering and soil isolation in urban landscapes. Ecological Engineering. 169:106307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106307
OpenUrl
↵
1. Miller RW,
2. Hauer RJ,
3. Werner LP.
2015. Urban forestry: Planning and managing urban greenspaces. Long Grove (IL, USA): Waveland Press, Inc. 560 p.
↵
1. Miron J,
2. Millward AA.
2024. Forecasting tree root architecture as a complement to proactive urban green space design. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 50(3):201–223. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2024.005
OpenUrl
↵
1. Carroll GD
1. Morris LA,
2. Miller M,
3. Ingerson M,
4. Figueroa D,
5. Orr M.
2009. Soil compaction and response to amelioration treatments around established trees in an urban campus environment. In: Carroll GD, editor. Proceedings of the 2009 Georgia Water Resources Conference. 2009 April 27–29; Athens (GA, US): The University of Georgia: Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources. p. 470–474.
↵
1. Nandhini P,
2. Senthamizh Selvi B,
3. Shoba N,
4. Maragatham S.
2021. Study of vertical mulching on physico chemical characters of tender nut water in coconut (Cocos nucífera L.) cv. COD. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 10(1): 1796–1800.
OpenUrl
↵
1. Ojha RB,
2. Devkota D.
2014. Earthworms: Soil and ecosystem engineers—A review. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2(6):257–260. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-6-1
OpenUrl
↵
1. Paembonan SA,
2. Hagihara A,
3. Hozumi K.
1990. Photosynthesis of a Hinoki tree. Transactions of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chubu Branch of the Japanese Forestry Society. p. 63–66.
↵
1. Parveaud CE,
2. Gomez C,
3. Bussi C,
4. Capowiez Y.
2012. Effect of white clover (Trifolium repens cv. Huia) cover crop on agronomic properties and soil biology in an organic peach orchard. ActaHorticulturae. 933:373–380. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.933.48
OpenUrl
↵
1. Percival GC,
2. Graham S,
3. Franklin E.
2023. The influence of soil decompaction and amendments on soil quality. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 49(4):179–189. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2023.012
OpenUrl
↵
1. Rahman MA,
2. Moser A,
3. Anderson M,
4. Zhang C,
5. Rötzerb T,
6. Pauleit S.
2019. Comparing the infiltration potentials of soils beneath the canopies of two contrasting urban tree species. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 38:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.002
OpenUrl
↵
1. Reid G,
2. Cox J.
2005. Soil biology testing. State of New South Wales (NSW, Australia): Dept of Primary Industry. [Accessed 2020 July]. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/41643/Soil_biology_testing.pdf
↵
1. Riches D,
2. Porter IJ,
3. Oliver DP,
4. Bramley RGV,
5. Rawnsley B,
6. Edwards J,
7. White RE.
2013. Review: Soil biological properties as indicators of soil quality in Australian viticulture. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 19(3):311–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12034
OpenUrl
↵
1. Ruiz SA,
2. Bickel S,
3. Or D.
2021. Global earthworm distribution and activity windows based on soil hydromechanical constraints. Communications Biology. 4:612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02139-5
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Sax MS,
2. Bassuk N,
3. van Es H,
4. Rakow D.
2017. Long-term remediation of compacted urban soils by physical fracturing and incorporation of compost. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 24:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.023
OpenUrl
↵
1. Scharenbroch BC.
2009. A meta-analysis of studies published in Arboriculture & Urban Forestry relating to organic materials and impacts on soil, tree, and environmental properties. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(5):221–231. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.036
OpenUrl
↵
1. Scharenbroch BC,
2. Watson GW.
2014. Wood chips and compost improve soil quality and increase growth of Acer rubrum and Betula nigra in compacted urban soil. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(6):319–331 https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.030
OpenUrl
↵
1. Hussain C,
2. Hait S
1. Singh S,
2. Sinha RK.
2022. Vermicomposting of organic wastes by earthworms: Making wealth from waste by converting ‘garbage into gold’ for farmers. In: Hussain C, Hait S, editors. Advanced organic waste management. Cambridge (MA, USA): Elsevier Inc. p. 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85792-5.00004-6
↵
1. Smetak KM,
2. Johnson-Maynard JL,
3. Lloyd JE.
2007. Earthworm population density and diversity in different-aged urban systems. Applied Soil Ecology. 37(1-2):161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.06.004
OpenUrl
↵
1. Smiley ET.
2001. Terravent™: Soil fracture patterns and impact on bulk density. Journal of Arboriculture. 27(6):326–330. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.036
OpenUrl
↵
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). 2007. White clover. In: Managing cover crops profitably. 3rd Ed. College Park (MD, USA): SARE Outreach. p. 167–184. https://www.sare.org/publications/managing-cover-crops-profitably/legume-cover-crops/white-clover
↵
1. Thomsen EO,
2. Reeve JR,
3. Culumber CM,
4. Alston DG,
5. Newhall R,
6. Cardon G.
2019. Simple soil tests for on-site evaluation of soil health in orchards. Sustainability. 11(21):6009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216009
OpenUrl
↵
1. Tytherleigh A,
2. Peel S,
3. Shaw G,
4. Rochford A.
2008. Soil sampling for habitat recreation and restoration. Natural England Technical Information Note TIN035. York (United Kingdom): Natural England. 3 p. https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/31015
↵
1. Watson GW,
2. Hewitt AM,
3. Custic M,
4. Lo M.
2014. The management of tree root systems in urban and suburban settings: A review of soil influence on root growth. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(4):193–217. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.021
OpenUrl
↵
1. McWilliams W,
2. Roesch FA
1. Winn MF,
2. Araman PA.
2010. A tool to determine crown and plot canopy transparency for forest inventory and analysis phase 3 plots using digital photographs. In: McWilliams W, Roesch FA, editors. Monitoring Across Borders: 2010 Joint Meeting of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium and the Southern Mensurationists. e-General Technical Report SRS-157. Asheville (NC, US): USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. p. 217–222. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs157/gtr_srs157_217.pdf

In this issue

Print

Bookmark this article

Related Articles

Cited By...

No citing articles found.

Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords