Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

The Efficacy of Various Preventive Soil-Applied Potassium Phosphite Products Against Foliar Phytophthora Infections on Rhododendron over Time

Caitlin A. Littlejohn, Drew C. Zwart, Matthew A. Borden and Andrew L. Loyd
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2025, 51 (3) 183-192; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2025.005
Caitlin A. Littlejohn
Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Drew C. Zwart
Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew A. Borden
Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew L. Loyd
Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, NC, USA, Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photograph illustrating treatment effects on suppression of Phytophthora infections in detached leaf assays over time where leaves were inoculated and then incubated for 5 days before photographing (Experiment 1).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Phosphite product manufacturer, formulation, product type, application method, and treatment rates for Experiment 1 and 2. ai (active ingredient).

    TreatmentManufacturerFormulationProduct typeApplicationRate (g ai/ft2)
    Non-treated—————
    Fortiphite1Plant Food Co., Inc.Soluble concentrateFertilizerDrench0.317
    Phosphite tablet2Doggett Corp.Slow-release tabletFertilizerSoil-dispersed0.4
    Reliant Dry Phite 28G3Quest Products Corp.GranuleFertilizerBroadcast4.6
    Reliant LQuest Products Corp.Soluble concentrateFungicideDrench0.441
    • ↵1 Generic fertilizer formulation of PolyPhosphite 30 (Plant Food Company, Inc, Cranbury, NJ, USA) 0-0-27.

    • ↵2 Proprietary, experimental fertilizer formulation from Doggett Corp. (Lebanon, NJ, USA) with unknown N-P-K breakdown.

    • ↵3 Fertilizer formulation of 0-0-7.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Treatment effects on detached wounded Rhododendron spp. leaves from the greenhouse study (Experiment 1), following artificial inoculation with an isolate of Phytophthora nicotianae. hpt (hours post-treatment); wpt (weeks post-treatment).

    Lesion size (cm2)(standard error of the mean)1
    Treatment248 hpt1 wpt2 wpt4 wpt5 wpt6 wpt8 wpt12 wpt
    Non-treated4.7 (1.0)4.7 (1.3) a3.8 (0.3) a4.2 (1.4) a5.8 (2.0) a5.8 (1.8) a3.6 (1.4)5.4 (2.0) a
    Fortiphite7.1 (0.7)0.4 (0.1) b0.5 (0.1) b0.1 (0.1) b0.2 (0.1) b0.3 (0.1) bc0.6 (0.3)0.1 (0.1) c
    Reliant Dry Phite 28G6.9 (0.9)0.5 (0.1) b0.2 (0.1) b0.2 (0.0) b0.3 (0.2) b0.2 (0.1) c0.5 (0.2)1.0 (0.3) bc
    Reliant L3.7 (1.5)0.8 (0.2) b0.5 (0.2) b0.2 (0.1) b0.3 (0.1) b0.7 (0.2) b0.7 (0.1)4.4 (1.1) ab
    P-value30.11180.0020< 0.00010.00010.0011< 0.00010.05800.0005
    • ↵1 Means in a column not followed by the same letter are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) according to the Tukey’s HSD post-hoc calculation for each time point independently.

    • ↵2 Phosphite treatment name.

    • 3 Data collected 5 days after inoculation was first (x + 1) Box-Cox transformed to normalize variance prior to conducting a one-way ANOVA for each time point independently. Bolded P-values indicate significant differences for each time point (P ≤ 0.05) while non-bolded P-values indicate no significance (P > 0.05) across treatments including the non-treated controls.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Treatment effects on detached wounded Rhododendron spp. leaves from the field study (Experiment 2), following artificial inoculation with an isolate of Phytophthora nicotianae. wpt (weeks post-treatment).

    Lesion size cm2 (standard error of the mean)1
    Treatment21 wpt2 wpt3 wpt4 wpt6 wpt8 wpt12 wpt
    Non-treated0.4 (0.2)6.3 (2.1)17.4 (3.4) a16.1 (2.0) a2.8 (1.0) a1.2 (0.3) a0.0 (0.0)
    Fortiphite0.4 (0.3)2.2 (0.8)3.1 (1.7) ab1.9 (1.0) bc0.1 (0.0) b0.2 (0.1) ab0.1 (0.1)
    Phosphite tablet0.2 (0.1)5.9 (3.2)7.2 (3.4) ab8.1 (5.3) ab0.9 (0.2) a0.7 (0.1) ab0.5 (0.3)
    Reliant Dryphite 28G0.3 (0.1)0.6 (0.4)1.0 (0.4) b0.8 (0.3) bc0.1 (0.0) b0.1 (0.1) b0.4 (0.2)
    Reliant L0.5 (0.1)1.8 (0.7)2.5 (2.0) b0.3 (0.3) c0.0 (0.0) b0.6 (0.3) ab0.5 (0.2)
    P-value30.75960.23780.01690.0009< 0.00010.01370.2646
    • ↵1 Means in a column not followed by the same letter are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) according to the Tukey’s HSD post-hoc calculation for each time point independently.

    • ↵2 Phosphite treatment name.

    • ↵3 Data collected five days after inoculation was first (x + 1) Box-Cox transformed to normalize variance prior to conducting a one-way ANOVA for each time point independently. Bolded P-values indicate significant differences for each time point (P ≤ 0.05) while non-bolded P-values indicate no significance (P > 0.05) across treatments including the non-treated controls.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry: 51 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 51, Issue 3
May 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Efficacy of Various Preventive Soil-Applied Potassium Phosphite Products Against Foliar Phytophthora Infections on Rhododendron over Time
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
The Efficacy of Various Preventive Soil-Applied Potassium Phosphite Products Against Foliar Phytophthora Infections on Rhododendron over Time
Caitlin A. Littlejohn, Drew C. Zwart, Matthew A. Borden, Andrew L. Loyd
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2025, 51 (3) 183-192; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2025.005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Efficacy of Various Preventive Soil-Applied Potassium Phosphite Products Against Foliar Phytophthora Infections on Rhododendron over Time
Caitlin A. Littlejohn, Drew C. Zwart, Matthew A. Borden, Andrew L. Loyd
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2025, 51 (3) 183-192; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2025.005
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions and Significance
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgements
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Induced Systemic Resistance
  • Integrated Pest Management
  • Polyphosphite

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire