Detection of Ganoderma australe Decay in Three Acacia confusa Trees: A Case Study | Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Literature Cited

↵
1. Ross RJ
1. Allison RB,
2. Wang X.
2015. Nondestructive testing in the urban forest. In: Ross RJ, editor. Nondestructive evaluation of wood. 2nd Ed. Madison (WI, USA): USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-238. p. 77–86. https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fpl_gtr238.pdf
↵
1. Bethge K,
2. Mattheck C,
3. Hunger E.
1996. Equipment for detection and evaluation of incipient decay in trees. Arboricultural Journal. 20(1):13–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1996.9747095
OpenUrl
↵
1. Brazee NJ,
2. Marra RE,
3. Göcke L,
4. van Wassenaer P.
2011. Non-destructive assessment of internal decay in three hardwood species of northeastern North America using sonic and electrical impedance tomography. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 84(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq040
OpenUrl
↵
1. Deflorio G,
2. Fink S,
3. Schwarze FWMR.
2008. Detection of incipient decay in tree stems with sonic tomography after wounding and fungal inoculation. Wood Science and Technology. 42:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-007-0159-0
OpenUrl
↵
1. Downes GM,
2. Lausberg M,
3. Potts BM,
4. Pilbeam DL,
5. Bird M,
6. Bradshaw B.
2018. Application of the IML Resistograph to the infield assessment of basic density in plantation eucalypts. Australian Forestry. 81(3):177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2018.1500676
OpenUrl
↵
FAKOPP. 2020. Manual for the ArborSonic3D acoustic tomograph. Agfalva (Hungary): Fakopp Enterprise Bt. User’s manual v6.5. 63 p. https://files.fakopp.com/upload/manuals/Manual.en-USv6.2.3.pdf
↵
1. Frontini F.
2017. In situ evaluation of a timber structure using a drilling resistance device. Case study: Kjøpmannsgata 27, Trondheim (Norway). International Wood Products Journal. 8(sup1): 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.1275092
OpenUrl
↵
1. Fundova I,
2. Funda T,
3. Wu HX.
2018. Non-destructive wood density assessment of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using Resistograph and Pilodyn. PLOS ONE. 13(9):e0204518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204518
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Gilbert EA,
2. Smiley ET.
2004. Picus sonic tomography for the quantification of decay in white oak (Quercus alba) and hickory (Carya spp.). Journal of Arboriculture. 30(5):277–280. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2004.033
OpenUrl
↵
1. Gilbert GS,
2. Ballesteros JO,
3. Barrios-Rodriguez CA,
4. Bonadies EF,
5. Cedeño-Sánchez ML,
6. Fossatti-Caballero NJ,
7. Trejos-Rodríguez MM,
8. Pérez-Suñiga JM,
9. Holub-Young KS,
10. Henn LAW,
11. Thompson JB,
12. García-López CG,
13. Romo AC,
14. Johnston DC,
15. Barrick PP,
16. Jordan FA,
17. Herschovich S,
18. Russo N,
19. Sánchez JD,
20. Fábrega JP,
21. Lumpkin R,
22. McWilliams HA,
23. Chester KN,
24. Burgos AC,
25. Wong EB,
26. Diab JH,
27. Renteria SA,
28. Harrower JT,
29. Hooton DA,
30. Glenn TC,
31. Faircloth BC,
32. Hubbell SP.
2016. Use of sonic tomography to detect and quantify wood decay in living trees. Applications in Plant Sciences. 4(12):1600060. https://doi.org/10.3732%2Fapps.1600060
OpenUrl
↵
1. Heikura T,
2. Terho M,
3. Perttunen J,
4. Sievänen R.
2008. A computerbased tool to link decay information to 3D architecture of urban trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 7(4):233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.07.001
OpenUrl
↵
1. Johnstone D,
2. Moore G,
3. Tausz M,
4. Nicolas M.
2010. The measurement of wood decay in landscape trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 36(3):121–127. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2010.016
OpenUrl
↵
1. Juhásová G,
2. Adamíková K,
3. Kobza M,
4. Hrubík P,
5. Serbinová K,
6. Hanzel E.
2007. Horticultural evaluation of woody plants in the National Cemetery Martin, Slovakia. Folia Oecologica. 34(1):9–15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298683441
OpenUrl
↵
1. Kaestner A,
2. Niemz P.
2004. Non-destructive methods to detect decay in trees. Wood Research. 49(2):17–28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289872726
OpenUrl
↵
1. Karlinasari L,
2. Danu D,
3. Nandika D,
4. Ipb K,
5. Bogor D,
6. Tujaman M.
2017. Drilling resistance method to evaluate density and hardness properties of resinous wood of agarwood (Aquilaria malaccensis). Wood Research. 62(5):683–690. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321061981
OpenUrl
↵
1. Karlinasari L,
2. Putri N,
3. Turjaman M,
4. Wahyudi I,
5. Nandika D.
2016. Moisture content effect on sound wave velocity and acoustic tomograms in agarwood trees (Aquilaria malaccensis Lamk.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 40(5):696–704. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1511-74
OpenUrl
↵
1. Li H,
2. Zhang X,
3. Li Z,
4. Wen J,
5. Tan X.
2022. A review of research on tree risk assessment methods. Forests. 13(1):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101556
OpenUrl
↵
1. Li L,
2. Wang X,
3. Wang L,
4. Allison RB.
2012. Acoustic tomography in relation to 2D ultrasonic velocity and hardness mappings. Wood Science and Technology 46:551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-011-0426-y
OpenUrl
↵
1. Ross RJ,
2. Wang X,
3. Brashaw BK
1. Liang S,
2. Wang X,
3. Wiedenbeck J,
4. Cai Z,
5. Fu F.
2008. Evaluation of acoustic tomography for tree decay detection. In: Ross RJ, Wang X, Brashaw BK, editors. Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood. 2007 September 10–12; Duluth, Minnesota, USA. Madison (WI, USA): Forest Products Society. 49–54. https://www.nrs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/jrnl/2008/nrs_2008_liang_001.pdf
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Huang YH,
3. Huang GS,
4. Wu ML.
2015. Detection and evaluation of termite damage in Norfolk island pine (Araucaria heteaophylla) trees by nondestructive techniques. Research Report on Experimental Forest, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University. 29(2):79–90. https://doi.org/10.6542/EFNTU.2015.29(2).2
OpenUrl
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Huang YH,
3. Huang GS,
4. Wu ML.
2016a. Detection of decay damage in iron-wood living trees by nondestructive techniques. Journal of Wood Science. 62:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-015-1520-9
OpenUrl
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Huang YH,
3. Huang GS,
4. Wu ML,
5. Yang TH.
2016b. Detection of termite damage in hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii) trees using nondestructive evaluation techniques. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 28(1):79–87.
OpenUrl
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Kao YC,
3. Lin TT,
4. Tsai MJ,
5. Wang SY,
6. Lin LD,
7. Wang YN,
8. Chan MH.
2008. Application of an ultrasonic tomographic technique for detecting defects in standing trees. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 62(4):434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.09.007
OpenUrl
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Lee CJ,
3. Tsai MJ.
2016c. Inspection and evaluation of decay damage in Japanese cedar trees through nondestructive techniques. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 42(3):201–212. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2016.018
OpenUrl
↵
1. Lin CJ,
2. Lin PH,
3. Chang CY,
4. Yeh JL.
2023. Detection of decay-induced damage in living camphor trees using stress wave tomography. Applied Science and Management Research. 10(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.6511/ASMR.202309_10(1).0007
OpenUrl
↵
1. Luley CJ.
2022. Wood decay fungi common to the Northeast and Central United States. 2nd Ed. Naples (NY, USA): Urban Forest Diagnostics LLC. 145 p.
↵
1. Lonsdale D
1. Mattheck C,
2. Breloer H.
1994. The body language of trees: A handbook for failure analysis. In: Lonsdale D, editor. Great Britain Department of the Environment Research for Amenity Trees, Volume 4. 3rd Ed. London (United Kingdom): Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. 240 p.
OpenUrl
↵
1. Ostrovský R,
2. Kobza M,
3. Gažo J.
2017. Extensively damaged trees tested with acoustic tomography considering tree stability in urban greenery. Trees. 31:1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1526-6
OpenUrl
↵
1. Pokorny J,
2. O’Brien J,
3. Hauer R,
4. Johnson G,
5. Albers J,
6. Bedker P,
7. Mielke M.
2003. Urban tree risk management: A community guide to program design and implementation. St. Paul (MN, USA): USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area. NA-TP-03-03. 204 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/na/NA-TP-03-03.pdf
↵
1. Rabe C,
2. Ferner D,
3. Fink S,
4. Schwarze FWMR.
2004. Detection of decay in trees with stress waves and interpretation of acoustic tomograms. Arboricultural Journal. 28(1-2):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2004.9747399
OpenUrl
↵
1. Rayner ADM,
2. Boddy L.
1988. Fungal decomposition of wood: Its biology and ecology. Chichester (United Kingdom): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 587 p.
↵
1. Seta GW, Widiyatno,
2. Hidayati F,
3. Na’iem M.
2021. Impact of thinning and pruning on tree growth, stress wave velocity, and pilodyn penetration response of clonal teak (Tectona grandis) plantation. Forest Science and Technology. 17(2): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2021.1911865
OpenUrl
↵
1. Sharapov E,
2. Brischke C,
3. Militz H.
2020. Assessment of preservative-treated wooden poles using drilling-resistance measurements. Forests. 11(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010020
OpenUrl
↵
1. Sharapov E,
2. Brischke C,
3. Militz H,
4. Smirnova E.
2018. Effects of white rot and brown rot decay on the drilling resistance measurements in wood. Holzforschung. 72(10):905–913. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2017-0204
OpenUrl
↵
1. Shigo AL.
1989. Tree pruning: A worldwide photo guide. 3rd Ed. Durham (NH, USA): Shigo and Trees, Associates. 180 p.
↵
1. Soge AO,
2. Popoola OI,
3. Adetoyinbo AA.
2020. Detection of wood decay and cavities in living trees: A review. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 51(7):937–947. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0340
OpenUrl
↵
1. Son J,
2. Kim S,
3. Shin J,
4. Lee G,
5. Kim H.
2021. Reliability of nondestructive sonic tomography for detection of defects in old Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino trees. Forest Science and Technology. 17(3):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2021.1946169
OpenUrl
↵
1. Tallavo F,
2. Cascante G,
3. Pandey MD.
2012. A novel methodology for condition assessment of wood poles using ultrasonic testing. NDT & E International. 52:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.002
OpenUrl
↵
1. Terho M,
2. Hantula J,
3. Hallaksela A-M.
2007. Occurrence and decay patterns of common wood-decay fungi in hazardous trees felled in the Helsinki City. Forest Pathology. 37(6):420–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00518.x
OpenUrl
↵
1. Wang X,
2. Allison RB.
2008. Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resistance microdrilling. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 34(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.001
OpenUrl
↵
1. Wang X,
2. Allison RB,
3. Wang L,
4. Ross RJ.
2007. Acoustic tomography for decay detection in red oak trees. Madison (WI, USA): USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. FPL-RP-642. 7 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/FPL-RP-642
↵
1. Wang X,
2. Wiedenbeck J,
3. Liang S.
2009. Acoustic tomography for decay detection in black cherry trees. Wood and Fiber Science. 41(2):127–137. https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/pdf2009/fpl_2009_wang001.pdf
OpenUrl
↵
1. Wang X,
2. Wiedenbeck J,
3. Ross RJ,
4. Forsman JW,
5. Erickson JR,
6. Pilon C,
7. Brashaw BK.
2005. Nondestructive evaluation of incipient decay in hardwood logs. Madison (WI, USA): USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. FPL-GTR-162. 11 pp. https://doi.org/10.2737/FPL-GTR-162
↵
1. Yasuda Y,
2. Iki T,
3. Takashima Y,
4. Takahashi M,
5. Hiraoka Y,
6. Mishima K.
2021. Genetic gains in wood property can be achieved by indirect selection and nondestructive measurements in full-sib families of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica. D. Don) plus tree clones. Annals of Forest Science. 78:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01064-1
OpenUrl

In this issue

Print

Bookmark this article

Related Articles

Cited By...

No citing articles found.

Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords